Literature DB >> 23630211

Primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis during the first two cycles only or throughout all chemotherapy cycles in patients with breast cancer at risk for febrile neutropenia.

Maureen J Aarts1, Frank P Peters, Caroline M Mandigers, M Wouter Dercksen, Jacqueline M Stouthard, Hans J Nortier, Hanneke W van Laarhoven, Laurence J van Warmerdam, Agnes J van de Wouw, Esther M Jacobs, Vera Mattijssen, Carin C van der Rijt, Tineke J Smilde, Annette W van der Velden, Mehmet Temizkan, Erdogan Batman, Erik W Muller, Saskia M van Gastel, George F Borm, Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Early breast cancer is commonly treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. However, combining these drugs increases the risk of myelotoxicity and may require granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The highest incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) and largest benefit of G-CSF during the first cycles of chemotherapy lead to questions about the effectiveness of continued use of G-CSF throughout later cycles of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter study, patients with breast cancer who were considered fit enough to receive 3-weekly polychemotherapy, but also had > 20% risk for FN, were randomly assigned to primary G-CSF prophylaxis during the first two chemotherapy cycles only (experimental arm) or to primary G-CSF prophylaxis throughout all chemotherapy cycles (standard arm). The noninferiority hypothesis was that the incidence of FN would be maximally 7.5% higher in the experimental compared with the standard arm.
RESULTS: After inclusion of 167 eligible patients, the independent data monitoring committee advised premature study closure. Of 84 patients randomly assigned to G-CSF throughout all chemotherapy cycles, eight (10%) experienced an episode of FN. In contrast, of 83 patients randomly assigned to G-CSF during the first two cycles only, 30 (36%) had an FN episode (95% CI, 0.13 to 0.54), with a peak incidence of 24% in the third cycle (ie, first cycle without G-CSF prophylaxis).
CONCLUSION: In patients with early breast cancer at high risk for FN, continued use of primary G-CSF prophylaxis during all chemotherapy cycles is of clinical relevance and thus cannot be abandoned.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23630211     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.6229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  21 in total

1.  Burden of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Hospitalizations in US Clinical Practice, by Use and Patterns of Prophylaxis with Colony-Stimulating Factor.

Authors:  Derek Weycker; Xiaoyan Li; Spiros Tzivelekis; Mark Atwood; Jacob Garcia; Yanli Li; Maureen Reiner; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Use of prophylactic growth factors and antimicrobials in elderly patients with cancer: a review of the Medicare database.

Authors:  Romina Sosa; Shuling Li; Julia T Molony; Jiannong Liu; Scott Stryker; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Use of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis and risk of infection, by chemotherapy cycle and regimen, among patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Wendy J Langeberg; Conchitina C Siozon; John H Page; P K Morrow; Victoria M Chia
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Febrile neutropenia (FN) and pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy: results from a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Jean Paul Salmon; Martin Smakal; Charisios Karanikiotis; Marek Z Wojtukiewicz; Yohann Omnes; Lucy DeCosta; Sally Wetten; James O'Kelly
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors as prophylaxis against febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  Sol Cortés de Miguel; Miguel Ángel Calleja-Hernández; Salomón Menjón-Beltrán; Inmaculada Vallejo-Rodríguez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Prophylactic antibiotics or G(M)-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nicole Skoetz; Julia Bohlius; Andreas Engert; Ina Monsef; Oliver Blank; Jörg-Janne Vehreschild
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-21

Review 7.  Presentation and management of docetaxel-related adverse effects in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria Y Ho; John R Mackey
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  The impact of chemotherapy dose intensity and supportive care on the risk of febrile neutropenia in patients with early stage breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eva Culakova; Marek S Poniewierski; Debra A Wolff; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-08-06

9.  Patterns of chemotherapy-associated toxicity and supportive care in US oncology practice: a nationwide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Eva Culakova; Ramya Thota; Marek S Poniewierski; Nicole M Kuderer; Adane F Wogu; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 10.  Management of sepsis in neutropenic patients: 2014 updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (AGIHO).

Authors:  Olaf Penack; Carolin Becker; Dieter Buchheidt; Maximilian Christopeit; Michael Kiehl; Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal; Marcus Hentrich; Marc Reinwald; Hans Salwender; Enrico Schalk; Martin Schmidt-Hieber; Thomas Weber; Helmut Ostermann
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.