Literature DB >> 28456671

Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of complication rates.

Fady Y Hijji1, Ankur S Narain1, Daniel D Bohl1, Junyoung Ahn1, William W Long1, Jacob V DiBattista1, Krishna T Kudaravalli1, Kern Singh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a frequently used technique for the treatment of lumbar pathology. Despite its overall success, LLIF has been associated with a unique set of complications. However, there has been inconsistent evidence regarding the complication rate of this approach.
PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review analyzing the rates of medical and surgical complications associated with LLIF. STUDY
DESIGN: Systematic review. PATIENT SAMPLE: 6,819 patients who underwent LLIF reported in clinical studies through June 2016. OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of complications within cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, urologic, gastrointestinal, transient neurologic, persistent neurologic, and spine (MSK) categories.
METHODS: This systematic review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies that identified rates of any complication following LLIF procedures were obtained from PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases. Articles were excluded if they did not report complications, presented mixed complication data from other procedures, or were characterized as single case reports, reviews, or case series containing less than 10 patients. The primary outcome was frequency of complications within cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, urologic, gastrointestinal, transient neurologic, persistent neurologic, and MSK categories. All rates of complications were based on the sample sizes of studies that mentioned the respective complications. The authors report no conflicts of interest directly or indirectly related to this work, and have not received any funds in support of this work.
RESULTS: A total of 2,232 articles were identified. Following screening of title, abstract, and full-text availability, 63 articles were included in the review. A total of 6,819 patients had 11,325 levels fused. The rate of complications for the categories included were as follows: wound (1.38%; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.00%-1.85%), cardiac (1.86%; CI=1.33%-2.52%), vascular (0.81%; CI=0.44%-1.36%), pulmonary (1.47; CI=0.95%-2.16%), gastrointestinal (1.38%; CI=1.00%-1.87%), urologic (0.93%; CI=0.55%-1.47%), transient neurologic (36.07%; CI=34.74%-37.41%), persistent neurologic (3.98%; CI=3.42%-4.60%), and MSK or spine (9.22%; CI=8.28%-10.23%).
CONCLUSIONS: The current study is the first to comprehensively analyze the complication profile for LLIFs. The most significant reported complications were transient neurologic in nature. However, persistent neurologic complications occurred at a much lower rate, bringing into question the significance of transient symptoms beyond the immediate postoperative period. Through this analysis of complication profiles, surgeons can better understand the risks to and expectations for patients following LLIF procedures.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; LLIF; Lateral lumbar interbody fusion; Lumbar spine; Systematic review; Transient neurologic

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28456671     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  18 in total

1.  Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting.

Authors:  James M Parrish; Nathaniel W Jenkins; Thomas S Brundage; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Jeffrey Podnar; Asokumar Buvanendran; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

Review 2.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Stephan N Salzmann; Jennifer Shue; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

3.  Morphometric anatomy of the lumbar sympathetic trunk with respect to the anterolateral approach to lumbar interbody fusion: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Gareth Rutter; Kevin Phan; Adam Smith; Fiona Stewart; Kevin Seex; Cristian Gragnaniello
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 4.  Artificial disc replacement in spine surgery.

Authors:  Yahya A Othman; Ravi Verma; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

5.  Complications associated with L4-5 anterior retroperitoneal trans-psoas interbody fusion: a single institution series.

Authors:  Saeed S Sadrameli; Vitaliy Davidov; Meng Huang; Jonathan J Lee; Srivathsan Ramesh; Jaime R Guerrero; Marcus S Wong; Zain Boghani; Adriana Ordonez; Sean M Barber; Todd W Trask; Andrew C Roeser; Paul J Holman
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-09

Review 6.  Lumbar spinal fusion in the outpatient setting: an update on management, surgical approaches and planning.

Authors:  Bryce A Basques; Joseph Ferguson; Kyle N Kunze; Frank M Phillips
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 7.  Interbody Fusions in the Lumbar Spine: A Review.

Authors:  Ravi Verma; Sohrab Virk; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-01-13

Review 8.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Is the Evidence of Indirect Neural Decompression? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Emanuele Quarto; Andrea Zanirato; Lorenzo Mosconi; Davide Vallerga; Irene Zotta; Maddalena Lontaro Baracchini; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-03-20

9.  One surgeon's learning curve with single position lateral lumbar interbody fusion: perioperative outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Shay I Warren; Harsh Wadhwa; Jayme C B Koltsov; John B Michaud; Ivan Cheng
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-06

10.  [Comparison of the effectiveness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of Cage dislodgement after lumbar surgery].

Authors:  Guangduo Zhu; Yingjie Hao; Lei Yu; Cheng Peng; Jian Zhu; Panke Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.