Literature DB >> 28456547

Visual Outcomes Following Bilateral lmplantation of Two Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lenses in 10 084 Eyes.

Rafael Bilbao-Calabuig1, Andrea Llovet-Rausell2, Julio Ortega-Usobiaga2, Mercedes Martínez-Del-Pozo2, Fernando Mayordomo-Cerdá2, Celia Segura-Albentosa2, Julio Baviera2, Fernando Llovet-Osuna2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate refractive and visual acuity outcomes, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence at 3 months of 2 diffractive (non-toric) trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in a large series of patients.
DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized clinical study.
METHODS: Patients underwent lens phacoemulsification and were implanted bilaterally with a diffractive trifocal IOL: FineVision Micro F (PhysIOL SA, Liège, Belgium) or AT Lisa tri 839MP (Carl Zeiss AG, Jena, Germany). Surgeries were performed between 2011 and 2015 with at least 3 months of follow-up. Visual and refractive performance, patient satisfaction, and spectacle independence were evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 10 084 trifocal IOLs were bilaterally implanted (5802 FineVision in 2901 patients and 4282 AT Lisa in 2141 patients). Three-month mean (± standard deviation) acuity: AT Lisa, binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), -0.01 logMAR ± 0.06; monocular distance corrected visual acuity (CDVA), 0.02 logMAR ± 0.06; binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm, 0.05 logMAR ± 0.08; binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 80 cm, -0.05 logMAR ± 0.14; postoperative spherical equivalent, 0.26 D ± 0.47; cylinder -0.34 D ± 0.38; FineVision Micro F, binocular UDVA, 0.01 logMAR ± 0.05; monocular CDVA, 0.03 logMAR ± 0.06; binocular UNVA, 0.05 logMAR ± 0.08; binocular UIVA, -0.05 logMAR ± 0.12; spherical equivalent, 0.34 D ± 0.50; cylinder -0.39 D ± 0.40. The IOLs were equivalent in achieving spectacle independence; 98% were "satisfied" to "very satisfied" with their IOL performance.
CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study with over 5000 patients, implantation of both trifocal IOL models provided good functional distance, intermediate, and near visual acuity, resulting in high levels of both spectacle independence and patient satisfaction.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28456547     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  18 in total

1.  [Optical quality of three trifocal intraocular lens models : An optical bench comparison].

Authors:  R Khoramnia; T M Yildirim; T Tandogan; S Liebing; G Łabuz; C Y Choi; G Auffarth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Early outcomes of vision and objective visual quality analysis after cataract surgery with trifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Mei-Fang Chu; Na Hui; Cong-Yi Wang; Lei Yu; Bo Ma; Yan Li; Cheng Pei
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Comparative analysis of visual outcomes, reading skills, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction with two models of trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses and an extended range of vision intraocular lens.

Authors:  Rita Mencucci; Eleonora Favuzza; Orsola Caporossi; Alfonso Savastano; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Binocular visual function after unilateral versus bilateral implantation of segmented refractive multifocal intraocular lenses: a pilot study.

Authors:  Yiyun Liu; Qianqian Lan; Tong Sun; Chuhao Tang; Tingting Yang; Hongyu Duan; Rongjun Liu; Hong Qi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparative analysis of visual quality between unilateral implantation of a trifocal intraocular lens and a rotationally asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Na Hui; Mei-Fang Chu; Yan Li; Cong-Yi Wang; Lei Yu; Bo Ma
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 1.645

6.  Cost-Effectiveness of Presbyopia Correction Among Seven Strategies of Bilateral Cataract Surgery Based on a Prospective Single-Blind Two-Center Trial in China.

Authors:  Qianqian Lan; Yiyun Liu; Fan Xu; Min Li; Yaxin Li; Tingting Yang; Tong Sun; Gang Yao; Baikai Ma; Liyuan Tao; Xin Xiao; Xing Lin Feng; Siming Zeng; Hong Qi
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-09-07

7.  Results of a clinical evaluation of a trifocal intraocular lens in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima; Yuka Ota; Ken Hayashi; Chizuka Igarashi; Noriyuki Sasaki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Visual performance, reading ability and patient satisfaction after implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Rita Mencucci; Eleonora Favuzza; Orsola Caporossi; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-13

9.  Through-Focus Vision Performance and Light Disturbances of 3 New Intraocular Lenses for Presbyopia Correction.

Authors:  Santiago Escandón-García; Filomena J Ribeiro; Colm McAlinden; António Queirós; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Clinical Results of Diffractive, Refractive, Hybrid Multifocal, and Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Agnieszka Dyrda; Ana Martínez-Palmer; Daniel Martín-Moral; Amanda Rey; Antonio Morilla; Miguel Castilla-Martí; Janny Aronés-Santivañez
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.