| Literature DB >> 28455632 |
Samuele Nanni1, Luigi Lovato2, Gabriele Ghetti3, Fabio Vagnarelli3, GianGaspare Mineo2, Rossella Fattori4, Francesco Saia3, Antonio Marzocchi3, Cinzia Marrozzini3, Maurizio Zompatori2, Letizia Bacchi Reggiani3, Franco Semprini3, Giovanni Melandri3, Elena Biagini3, Anna Corsini3, Giulia Norscini3, Claudio Rapezzi3.
Abstract
To assess the accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for the diagnosis of angiographic stenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of left main coronary artery (LMCA). Patients undergone in the last year PCI of unprotected LMCA and scheduled for conventional X-ray coronary angiography (CXA) were evaluated with stress perfusion CMR within 2 weeks before CXA. Main contraindications to CMR were exclusion criteria. Stress perfusion CMR was performed to follow a bolus of contrast Gadobutrol after 3 min of adenosine infusion. Between the 50 patients enrolled, only 1 did not finish the CMR protocol and 49 patients with median age 71 (65-75) years (38 male, 11 female) were analyzed. Between 784 coronary angiographic segments evaluated we found 75 stenosis or occlusions (prevalence 9.5%), but only 13 stenosis or occlusions in proximal segments (prevalence 6.6%). Patients with coronary stenosis (n = 12, 24%) showed a significantly (p = 0.002) higher prevalence of diabetes (7 of 12, 58%). At CMR examination, late gadolinium enhancement was present in 25 (51%), reversible perfusion defects in 12 (24%), and fixed perfusion defects in 6 subjects (12%). The only patient with LMCA restenosis resulted positive at perfusion CMR. The accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in diagnosis of coronary stenosis was higher when the analysis was performed only in proximal coronary arteries (95%, CI 86-99) compared to overall vessels (84%, CI 70-92). Stress perfusion CMR could strongly reduce the need for elective CXA in follow up of LMCA PCI and should be validated in further multicenter prospective studies.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac magnetic resonance; Diagnostic accuracy; Left main coronary artery disease; Percutaneous coronary intervention
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28455632 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1149-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ISSN: 1569-5794 Impact factor: 2.357