Literature DB >> 28455632

Utility of stress perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance in follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions of the left main coronary artery.

Samuele Nanni1, Luigi Lovato2, Gabriele Ghetti3, Fabio Vagnarelli3, GianGaspare Mineo2, Rossella Fattori4, Francesco Saia3, Antonio Marzocchi3, Cinzia Marrozzini3, Maurizio Zompatori2, Letizia Bacchi Reggiani3, Franco Semprini3, Giovanni Melandri3, Elena Biagini3, Anna Corsini3, Giulia Norscini3, Claudio Rapezzi3.   

Abstract

To assess the accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for the diagnosis of angiographic stenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of left main coronary artery (LMCA). Patients undergone in the last year PCI of unprotected LMCA and scheduled for conventional X-ray coronary angiography (CXA) were evaluated with stress perfusion CMR within 2 weeks before CXA. Main contraindications to CMR were exclusion criteria. Stress perfusion CMR was performed to follow a bolus of contrast Gadobutrol after 3 min of adenosine infusion. Between the 50 patients enrolled, only 1 did not finish the CMR protocol and 49 patients with median age 71 (65-75) years (38 male, 11 female) were analyzed. Between 784 coronary angiographic segments evaluated we found 75 stenosis or occlusions (prevalence 9.5%), but only 13 stenosis or occlusions in proximal segments (prevalence 6.6%). Patients with coronary stenosis (n = 12, 24%) showed a significantly (p = 0.002) higher prevalence of diabetes (7 of 12, 58%). At CMR examination, late gadolinium enhancement was present in 25 (51%), reversible perfusion defects in 12 (24%), and fixed perfusion defects in 6 subjects (12%). The only patient with LMCA restenosis resulted positive at perfusion CMR. The accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in diagnosis of coronary stenosis was higher when the analysis was performed only in proximal coronary arteries (95%, CI 86-99) compared to overall vessels (84%, CI 70-92). Stress perfusion CMR could strongly reduce the need for elective CXA in follow up of LMCA PCI and should be validated in further multicenter prospective studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac magnetic resonance; Diagnostic accuracy; Left main coronary artery disease; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28455632     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1149-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  35 in total

1.  Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients.

Authors:  F Roques; S A Nashef; P Michel; E Gauducheau; C de Vincentiis; E Baudet; J Cortina; M David; A Faichney; F Gabrielle; E Gams; A Harjula; M T Jones; P P Pintor; R Salamon; L Thulin
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 2.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Improved detection of coronary artery disease by stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance with the use of delayed enhancement infarction imaging.

Authors:  Igor Klem; John F Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Michael H Sketch; Victor Behar; Jonathan Weinsaft; Peter Cawley; Michele Parker; Michael Elliott; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  The Impact of Routine Angiographic Follow-Up in a Population of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Within the Left Main Coronary Artery.

Authors:  Grzegorz Mencel; Jacek Kowalczyk; Radosław Lenarczyk; Piotr Chodór; Tomasz Wąs; Marcin Świerad; Grzegorz Honisz; Andrzej Świątkowski; Aleksandra Woźniak; Zbigniew Kalarus; Beata Sredniawa
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 5.  Current management of left main coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jean Fajadet; Alaide Chieffo
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Oblique views in magnetic resonance imaging of the heart by combined axial rotations.

Authors:  A C Van Rossum; F C Visser; M J Van Eenige; J Valk; J P Roos
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter; Christian M Wacker; Norbert Wilke; Nidal Al-Saadi; Ekkehart Sauer; Kalman Huettle; Stefan O Schönberg; Andreas Luchner; Oliver Strohm; Hakan Ahlstrom; Thorsten Dill; Nadja Hoebel; Tamas Simor
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience.

Authors:  T H Giang; D Nanz; R Coulden; M Friedrich; M Graves; N Al-Saadi; T F Lüscher; G K von Schulthess; J Schwitter
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Impact of routine angiographic follow-up after percutaneous coronary drug-eluting stenting for unprotected left main disease: the Turin Registry.

Authors:  Giuseppe G L Biondi-Zoccai; Elena Giraudi; Claudio Moretti; Filippo Sciuto; Pierluigi Omedè; Dario Sillano; Paolo Garrone; Gian Paolo Trevi; Imad Sheiban
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-01-03       Impact factor: 5.460

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Contemporary Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in the Management of Patients with Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Stamatis S Papadatos; Archontoula Michelongona; Konstantinos Lampropoulos; Dimitrios Farmakis; Vassilis Vassiliou
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.