B A Mahal1,2, Y-W Chen2,3, V Muralidhar2,4, A R Mahal5, T K Choueiri2,6, K E Hoffman7, J C Hu8, C J Sweeney2,6, J B Yu5, F Y Feng9, S P Kim10, C J Beard2,3, N E Martin2,3, Q-D Trinh2,11, P L Nguyen2,3. 1. Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, USA. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA. 4. Deparment of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA. 5. Department of Therapeutic Radiology/Radiation Oncology, Yale, New Haven, USA. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA. 8. Department of Urology, Cornell (New York-Presbyterian Hospital), New York, USA. 9. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 10. Department of Urology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine (University Hospitals), Cleveland, USA. 11. Division of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Abstract
Background: In 2012, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, despite evidence that Black men are at a higher risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). We evaluated whether Black men of potentially screening-eligible age (55-69 years) are at a disproportionally high risk of poor outcomes. Patients and methods: The SEER database was used to study 390 259 men diagnosed with prostate cancer in the United States between 2004 and 2011. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the association between Black race and stage of presentation, while Fine-Gray competing risks regression modeled the association between Black race and PCSM, both as a function of screening eligibility (age 55-69 years versus not). Results: Black men were more likely to present with metastatic disease (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.65; 1.58-1.72; P < 0.001) and were at a higher risk of PCSM (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.36; 1.27-1.46; P < 0.001) compared to non-Black men. There were significant interactions between race and PSA-screening eligibility such that Black patients experienced more disproportionate rates of metastatic disease (AOR 1.76; 1.65-1.87 versus 1.55; 1.47-1.65; Pinteraction < 0.001) and PCSM (AHR 1.53; 1.37-1.70 versus 1.25; 1.14-1.37; Pinteraction = 0.01) in the potentially PSA-screening eligible group than in the group not eligible for screening. Conclusions: Racial disparities in prostate cancer outcome among Black men are significantly worse in PSA-screening eligible populations. These results raise the possibility that Black men could be disproportionately impacted by recommendations to end PSA screening in the United States and suggest that Black race should be included in the updated USPSTF PSA screening guidelines.
Background: In 2012, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, despite evidence that Black men are at a higher risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM). We evaluated whether Black men of potentially screening-eligible age (55-69 years) are at a disproportionally high risk of poor outcomes. Patients and methods: The SEER database was used to study 390 259 men diagnosed with prostate cancer in the United States between 2004 and 2011. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the association between Black race and stage of presentation, while Fine-Gray competing risks regression modeled the association between Black race and PCSM, both as a function of screening eligibility (age 55-69 years versus not). Results: Black men were more likely to present with metastatic disease (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.65; 1.58-1.72; P < 0.001) and were at a higher risk of PCSM (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.36; 1.27-1.46; P < 0.001) compared to non-Black men. There were significant interactions between race and PSA-screening eligibility such that Black patients experienced more disproportionate rates of metastatic disease (AOR 1.76; 1.65-1.87 versus 1.55; 1.47-1.65; Pinteraction < 0.001) and PCSM (AHR 1.53; 1.37-1.70 versus 1.25; 1.14-1.37; Pinteraction = 0.01) in the potentially PSA-screening eligible group than in the group not eligible for screening. Conclusions: Racial disparities in prostate cancer outcome among Black men are significantly worse in PSA-screening eligible populations. These results raise the possibility that Black men could be disproportionately impacted by recommendations to end PSA screening in the United States and suggest that Black race should be included in the updated USPSTF PSA screening guidelines.
Authors: Zhenzhen Zhang; Mark Garzotto; Edward W Davis; Motomi Mori; Wesley A Stoller; Paige E Farris; Carmen P Wong; Laura M Beaver; George V Thomas; David E Williams; Roderick H Dashwood; David A Hendrix; Emily Ho; Jackilen Shannon Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Leanne Woods-Burnham; Laura Stiel; Shannalee R Martinez; Evelyn S Sanchez-Hernandez; Herbert C Ruckle; Frankis G Almaguel; Mariana C Stern; Lisa R Roberts; David R Williams; Susanne Montgomery; Carlos A Casiano Journal: Cancer Health Disparities Date: 2020
Authors: Samuel L Washington; John Neuhaus; Maxwell V Meng; Sima P Porten Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-05-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Brittaney-Belle E Gordon; Ramsankar Basak; William R Carpenter; Deborah Usinger; Paul A Godley; Ronald C Chen Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Alexander P Cole; Peter Herzog; Hari S Iyer; Maya Marchese; Brandon A Mahal; Stuart R Lipsitz; Joshua Nyambose; Susan T Gershman; Mark Kennedy; Gail Merriam; Timothy R Rebbeck; Quoc-Dien Trinh Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Leanne Woods-Burnham; Anamika Basu; Christina K Cajigas-Du Ross; Arthur Love; Clayton Yates; Marino De Leon; Sourav Roy; Carlos A Casiano Journal: Prostate Date: 2017-10-14 Impact factor: 4.012
Authors: Leanne Woods-Burnham; Laura Stiel; Colwick Wilson; Susanne Montgomery; Alfonso M Durán; Herbert R Ruckle; Rupert A Thompson; Marino De León; Carlos A Casiano Journal: Am J Mens Health Date: 2018-04-16
Authors: S Halabi; S Dutta; C M Tangen; M Rosenthal; D P Petrylak; I M Thompson; K N Chi; J S De Bono; J C Araujo; C Logothetis; M A Eisenberger; D I Quinn; K Fizazi; M J Morris; C S Higano; I F Tannock; E J Small; W K Kelly Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2020-04-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Richard M Hoffman; Sarah L Mott; Bradley D McDowell; Sonia T Anand; Kenneth G Nepple Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 5.455