Literature DB >> 28453553

A tool for discovering drug sensitivity and gene expression associations in cancer cells.

Yong Qin1, Anthony P Conley2, Elizabeth A Grimm1, Jason Roszik1,3.   

Abstract

The sensitivity of cancer cells to anticancer drugs is a crucial factor for developing effective treatments. However, it is still challenging to precisely predict the effectiveness of therapeutics in humans within a complex genomic and molecular context. We developed an interface which allows the user to rapidly explore drug sensitivity and gene expression associations. Predictions for how expression of various genes affect anticancer drug activity are available for all genes for a set of therapeutics based on data from various cell lines of different origin in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia and the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer projects. Our application makes discovery or validation of drug sensitivity and gene expression associations efficient. Effectiveness of this tool is demonstrated by multiple known and novel examples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28453553      PMCID: PMC5409143          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

In silico prediction of drug efficacy and resistance significantly increases efficiency of drug discovery. Multiple computational tools have been developed to help identify potential indications for drugs using molecular features that are now available in large public databases [1]. Drug sensitivity information on cell lines is one of these features which is frequently used to identify potential therapeutics for cancer and other diseases. However, drug effectiveness is not only determined by the expression of the direct target, but it also depends on genomic background and other molecules that affect the biological context of the drug-target interaction [2]. To improve drug effectiveness and identify potential combination therapeutics for cancer, it is essential to examine the effects of different genes on drug activity within a large biological context. This can help to identify key factors correlating with drug response that may be secondary targets. A way to achieve this goal is identifying genes that show an association with response/resistance to drugs by screening of cell lines. The databases of Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) [3] and Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) [4] projects contain gene expression levels from next generation sequencing and also drug screening data for a large number of cancer cell lines. In order to efficiently examine relationships of a given gene and the sensitivity of cancer cells to specific anticancer drugs, we created an interface that can be rapidly queried to identify potentially relevant genes/targets associated with drug effectiveness in specific cancer types based on the genomic and pharmacologic data of cancer cell lines in the CCLE and GDSC. Moreover, the results from one data set can be used as validation data for the other. Using this method, we recently found that higher expression of HGF, MET, and VEGF-A genes correlates with lower sensitivity to a BRAF(V600E) inhibitor in melanoma cells [5]. The positive correlation of HGF, MET, and VEGF-A expression and PLX4720 EC50 indicated that hypoxia-driven upregulation of these genes results in increased resistance to PLX4720 in melanoma. Our in vitro drug studies confirmed that high level of HGF/MET signaling correlates with low sensitivity to a BRAF(V600E) inhibitor in melanoma [5]. Our application makes it easy to identify such associations, and it provides detailed correlation analyses for hypothesis generation or validation purposes. The tool is freely available as a web interface, and it can also be downloaded and used in the Tableau Desktop software.

Results and discussion

In our previous study [5], we have successfully used this approach to identify HGF, MET, and VEGF-A expression correlations with resistance to a BRAF(V600E) inhibitor, which was experimentally confirmed and has clinically relevant implications. We also used this method to analyze the role of iNOS in pancreatic cancer [6]. Here we present two analyses showing novel relationships between two relevant genes and multiple anticancer drugs in various cancers. The tool is freely available at: https://public.tableau.com/profile/jason.roszik#!/vizhome/CCLE_GDSC_correlations/CCLE_GDSC

NQO1 expression correlates with 17-AGG activity

Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a molecular chaperone which has been successfully targeted in pre-clinical and clinical models to inhibit tumor growth. However, the optimal use of Hsp90 inhibitors is still to be determined in cancer patients [7]. It was recently shown that NAD(P)H:quinone dehydrogenase 1 (NQO1) expression and the Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG sensitivity are inversely correlated in melanoma cells [8]. Furthermore, 17-AAG sensitivity was found to be related to NQO1 protein levels and enzymatic activity in pancreatic and colorectal cancer cells [9]. These studies indicate that high levels NQO1 expression may sensitize cancer cells to 17-AAG. As shown in Fig 1, the analysis using our tool confirms that NQO1 expression negatively correlates with the EC50 of 17-AAG in melanoma and in pancreatic cancer cells in the CCLE. Moreover, this association was also found in various other cancer cell lines such as breast, liver, brain, ovary, and lung cancers, which have not been reported. Consistently, this negative correlation was confirmed in seven cancer types, endometrium, glioma, liver, non-small cell lung cancer, neuroblastoma, ovary, and stomach, in both CCLE and GDSC data sets (Fig 1). Our results point to the application of NQO1 as a predictive marker in a wide range of cancers to estimate effectiveness of Hsp90 inhibitors.
Fig 1

NQO1 expression correlates with 17-AAG effectiveness in multiple cancer types.

Green color represents negative Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between NQO1expression and 17-AAG EC50 in the CCLE (A) and IC50 (EC50 was not available) in GDSC (B). These results indicate that 17-AAG works better when NQO1 expression is higher. Only p < 0.05 correlations are shown.

NQO1 expression correlates with 17-AAG effectiveness in multiple cancer types.

Green color represents negative Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between NQO1expression and 17-AAG EC50 in the CCLE (A) and IC50 (EC50 was not available) in GDSC (B). These results indicate that 17-AAG works better when NQO1 expression is higher. Only p < 0.05 correlations are shown.

Effect of VEGFA expression on multiple anticancer drugs’ sensitivity

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) is a crucial signal protein which stimulates vasculogensis and angiogenesis. The overexpression of VEGFA has been associated with tumor progression and poor outcome in cancer patients [10]. VEGF-A production can be induced in cells under hypoxia, and hypoxia-inducible factor-1(HIF-1) can stimulate the transcription of VEGFA [10]. Hypoxia plays an important role in tumor progression and development of therapy resistance. As a result of hypoxia driven context changes, cancer cells under hypoxia change their sensitivity to drugs. Therapeutics have been developed to target VEGF-A, such as bevacizumab, which was approved by the FDA in 2004. However, only about 10–15% of patients benefit from bevacizumab therapy, and biomarkers for bevacizumab efficacy are not yet known [10]. Thus, it is important to examine the effect of VEGFA expression on other cancer therapeutics, as this may provide suggestions for combination therapies with VDGF-A inhibitors. As shown in Fig 2A of the CCLE data set, VEGFA expression positively correlates with IC50 of TAE684 in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and soft tissue tumor cell lines, indicating that high levels of VEGFA expression correlates with resistance to the TAE684 ALK inhibitor. Furthermore, this positive correlation was also confirmed in soft tissue cancer cells in the GDSC data set (Fig 2B). Intriguingly, a study by Kogita and colleagues showed that hypoxia induced resistance to ALK inhibitors [11], which provides additional support to suggest that hypoxia-driven upregulation of VEGF-A may contribute to ALK inhibitor resistance. In both CCLE and GDSC data sets, VEGFA expression positively correlates with IC50 of PD-0325901 (MEK inhibitor) and PLX4720 (BRAF(V600E) inhibitor) in melanoma cells (Fig 2A and 2B). Since MEK is the direct downstream mediator of BRAF signaling, our discovery further implicates that the overexpression of VEGF-A may be a crucial hypoxic factor contributing to the enhanced resistance to blockade of aberrant BRAF(V600E) signaling in melanoma. Interestingly, VEGFA expression can be either a potential positive or negative factor in different cancer types in responding to different treatments. For example, there are negative correlations between VEGFA expression and PLX4720 in soft tissue, large intestine, and non-small cell lung cancer cells (Fig 2A and 2B). These results indicate that VEGFA may play different roles in different cancer cells when using VEGF-A inhibitors, and it need to be carefully examined when combining with ALK, RAF, or MEK inhibitors in various cancers.
Fig 2

VEGFA expression correlates with drug sensitivity.

Green and red colors represent negative and positive Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between VEGFA levels and different anticancer drugs’ IC50 in the CCLE (A) and GDSC (B). A positive correlation with IC50 means that the drug is less effective; a negative correlation indicates that it is more effective when VEGFA expression is higher. p < 0.05 correlations are displayed.

VEGFA expression correlates with drug sensitivity.

Green and red colors represent negative and positive Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between VEGFA levels and different anticancer drugs’ IC50 in the CCLE (A) and GDSC (B). A positive correlation with IC50 means that the drug is less effective; a negative correlation indicates that it is more effective when VEGFA expression is higher. p < 0.05 correlations are displayed.

Methods

IC50 and EC50 values, that are commonly used to evaluate drug effectiveness, were available in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) project [3] for 24 well-known targeted therapeutics. Furthermore, IC50 results for 265 drugs can be downloaded from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) database [4]. More than one thousand cancer cell lines derived from various tissues that cover most common cancer types were tested with these therapeutics. Cell line information, gene expression, and drug screening data were downloaded from the website of the CCLE and GDSC projects. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were calculated using the R software. To use only the robust correlations, we included only the correlations with p < 0.05. The visualization interface was created using the Tableau software [12]. In the web interface, correlation coefficients and p-values are shown when moving the mouse over areas of interest.

Conclusions

We have developed an interface to identify potentially relevant targets associated with drug effectiveness in multiple cancer types based on genomic and pharmacologic data of cancer cell lines. By facilitating the identification of potential markers and targets for combination therapies this tool is intended to make drug development more cost-efficient and increase the likelihood for finding new targets.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer.

Authors:  Jane Trepel; Mehdi Mollapour; Giuseppe Giaccone; Len Neckers
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Hypoxia-Driven Mechanism of Vemurafenib Resistance in Melanoma.

Authors:  Yong Qin; Jason Roszik; Chandrani Chattopadhyay; Yuuri Hashimoto; Chengwen Liu; Zachary A Cooper; Jennifer A Wargo; Patrick Hwu; Suhendan Ekmekcioglu; Elizabeth A Grimm
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 3.  The Complexity of Translating Anti-angiogenesis Therapy from Basic Science to the Clinic.

Authors:  Weilan Ye
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 12.270

4.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity.

Authors:  Jordi Barretina; Giordano Caponigro; Nicolas Stransky; Kavitha Venkatesan; Adam A Margolin; Sungjoon Kim; Christopher J Wilson; Joseph Lehár; Gregory V Kryukov; Dmitriy Sonkin; Anupama Reddy; Manway Liu; Lauren Murray; Michael F Berger; John E Monahan; Paula Morais; Jodi Meltzer; Adam Korejwa; Judit Jané-Valbuena; Felipa A Mapa; Joseph Thibault; Eva Bric-Furlong; Pichai Raman; Aaron Shipway; Ingo H Engels; Jill Cheng; Guoying K Yu; Jianjun Yu; Peter Aspesi; Melanie de Silva; Kalpana Jagtap; Michael D Jones; Li Wang; Charles Hatton; Emanuele Palescandolo; Supriya Gupta; Scott Mahan; Carrie Sougnez; Robert C Onofrio; Ted Liefeld; Laura MacConaill; Wendy Winckler; Michael Reich; Nanxin Li; Jill P Mesirov; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Kristin Ardlie; Vivien Chan; Vic E Myer; Barbara L Weber; Jeff Porter; Markus Warmuth; Peter Finan; Jennifer L Harris; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Michael P Morrissey; William R Sellers; Robert Schlegel; Levi A Garraway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Comparative Study of 17-AAG and NVP-AUY922 in Pancreatic and Colorectal Cancer Cells: Are There Common Determinants of Sensitivity?

Authors:  Leticia Mayor-López; Elena Tristante; Mar Carballo-Santana; Estefanía Carrasco-García; Silvina Grasso; Pilar García-Morales; Miguel Saceda; Juan Luján; José García-Solano; Fernando Carballo; Carlos de Torre; Isabel Martínez-Lacaci
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.243

6.  A Landscape of Pharmacogenomic Interactions in Cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Iorio; Theo A Knijnenburg; Daniel J Vis; Graham R Bignell; Michael P Menden; Michael Schubert; Nanne Aben; Emanuel Gonçalves; Syd Barthorpe; Howard Lightfoot; Thomas Cokelaer; Patricia Greninger; Ewald van Dyk; Han Chang; Heshani de Silva; Holger Heyn; Xianming Deng; Regina K Egan; Qingsong Liu; Tatiana Mironenko; Xeni Mitropoulos; Laura Richardson; Jinhua Wang; Tinghu Zhang; Sebastian Moran; Sergi Sayols; Maryam Soleimani; David Tamborero; Nuria Lopez-Bigas; Petra Ross-Macdonald; Manel Esteller; Nathanael S Gray; Daniel A Haber; Michael R Stratton; Cyril H Benes; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Julio Saez-Rodriguez; Ultan McDermott; Mathew J Garnett
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Exploiting the neoantigen landscape for immunotherapy of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Peter Bailey; David K Chang; Marie-Andrée Forget; Francis A San Lucas; Hector A Alvarez; Cara Haymaker; Chandrani Chattopadhyay; Sun-Hee Kim; Suhendan Ekmekcioglu; Elizabeth A Grimm; Andrew V Biankin; Patrick Hwu; Anirban Maitra; Jason Roszik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Hypoxia induces resistance to ALK inhibitors in the H3122 non-small cell lung cancer cell line with an ALK rearrangement via epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Authors:  Akihiro Kogita; Yosuke Togashi; Hidetoshi Hayashi; Shunsuke Sogabe; Masato Terashima; Marco A De Velasco; Kazuko Sakai; Yoshihiko Fujita; Shuta Tomida; Yoshifumi Takeyama; Kiyotaka Okuno; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Kazuto Nishio
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.650

9.  NAD(P)H:Quinone Oxidoreductase-1 Expression Sensitizes Malignant Melanoma Cells to the HSP90 Inhibitor 17-AAG.

Authors:  Shuya Kasai; Nobuyuki Arakawa; Ayaka Okubo; Wataru Shigeeda; Shinji Yasuhira; Tomoyuki Masuda; Toshihide Akasaka; Masahiko Shibazaki; Chihaya Maesawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Computational models for predicting drug responses in cancer research.

Authors:  Francisco Azuaje
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 11.622

View more
  14 in total

1.  Predicting Novel Therapies and Targets: Regulation of Notch3 by the Bromodomain Protein BRD4.

Authors:  Jason Roszik; Anil K Sood; Alejandro Villar-Prados; Sherry Y Wu; Karem A Court; Shaolin Ma; Christopher LaFargue; Mamur A Chowdhury; Margaret I Engelhardt; Cristina Ivan; Prahlad T Ram; Ying Wang; Keith Baggerly; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Shyh Ming-Yang; David J Maloney; Makoto Yoshioka; Jeffrey W Strovel
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  PANOPLY: Omics-Guided Drug Prioritization Method Tailored to an Individual Patient.

Authors:  Krishna R Kalari; Jason P Sinnwell; Kevin J Thompson; Xiaojia Tang; Erin E Carlson; Jia Yu; Peter T Vedell; James N Ingle; Richard M Weinshilboum; Judy C Boughey; Liewei Wang; Matthew P Goetz; Vera Suman
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

3.  CDK3, CDK5 and CDK8 Proteins as Prognostic and Potential Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Yanhong Zhou; Li Hua; Jiaxiang Li; Ni Zhu; Yifei Liu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-02-27

4.  Machine Learning Predictor of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Response in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Ji-Yong Sung; Jae-Ho Cheong
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  PATRI, a Genomics Data Integration Tool for Biomarker Discovery.

Authors:  G Ukmar; G E M Melloni; L Raddrizzani; P Rossi; S Di Bella; M R Pirchio; M Vescovi; A Leone; M Callari; M Cesarini; A Somaschini; G Della Vedova; M G Daidone; M Pettenella; A Isacchi; R Bosotti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Integrative Radiogenomics Approach for Risk Assessment of Post-Operative Metastasis in Pathological T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Hwan-Ho Cho; Je-Gun Joung; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Do-Hyun Nam; Woong-Yang Park; Chan Kyo Kim; Seong Il Seo; Hyunjin Park
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  High-Throughput Architecture for Discovering Combination Cancer Therapeutics.

Authors:  Matt Gianni; Yong Qin; Geert Wenes; Becca Bandstra; Anthony P Conley; Vivek Subbiah; Raya Leibowitz-Amit; Suhendan Ekmekcioglu; Elizabeth A Grimm; Jason Roszik
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2018-12

8.  Chemotherapy confers a conserved secondary tolerance to EGFR inhibition via AXL-mediated signaling bypass.

Authors:  Mark Borris D Aldonza; Roben D Delos Reyes; Young Seo Kim; Jayoung Ku; Ana Melisa Barsallo; Ji-Young Hong; Sang Kook Lee; Han Suk Ryu; YongKeun Park; Je-Yoel Cho; Yoosik Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Prior acquired resistance to paclitaxel relays diverse EGFR-targeted therapy persistence mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark Borris D Aldonza; Jayoung Ku; Ji-Young Hong; Donghwa Kim; Seung Jung Yu; Min-Seok Lee; Monica Celine Prayogo; Stephanie Tan; Dayeon Kim; Jinju Han; Sang Kook Lee; Sung Gap Im; Han Suk Ryu; Yoosik Kim
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Effects of Gallotannin-Enriched Extract of Galla Rhois on the Activation of Apoptosis, Cell Cycle Arrest, and Inhibition of Migration Ability in LLC1 Cells and LLC1 Tumors.

Authors:  Mi Ju Kang; Ji Eun Kim; Ji Won Park; Hyun Jun Choi; Su Ji Bae; Sun Il Choi; Jin Tae Hong; Dae Youn Hwang
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.