Literature DB >> 28453271

An Efficient Metadynamics-Based Protocol To Model the Binding Affinity and the Transition State Ensemble of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Ligands.

Noureldin Saleh1, Passainte Ibrahim1, Giorgio Saladino2, Francesco Luigi Gervasio2,3, Timothy Clark1.   

Abstract

A generally applicable metadynamics scheme for predicting the free energy profile of ligand binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is described. A common and effective collective variable (CV) has been defined using the ideally placed and highly conserved Trp6.48 as a reference point for ligand-GPCR distance measurement and the common orientation of GPCRs in the cell membrane. Using this single CV together with well-tempered multiple-walker metadynamics with a funnel-like boundary allows an efficient exploration of the entire ligand binding path from the extracellular medium to the orthosteric binding site, including vestibule and intermediate sites. The protocol can be used with X-ray structures or high-quality homology models (based on a high-quality template and after thorough refinement) for the receptor and is universally applicable to agonists, antagonists, and partial and reverse agonists. The root-mean-square error (RMSE) in predicted binding free energies for 12 diverse ligands in five receptors (a total of 23 data points) is surprisingly small (less than 1 kcal mol-1). The RMSEs for simulations that use receptor X-ray structures and homology models are very similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28453271     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  36 in total

1.  Discovery of Novel Nonpeptidic PAR2 Ligands.

Authors:  Ilona Klösel; Maximilian F Schmidt; Jonas Kaindl; Harald Hübner; Dorothee Weikert; Peter Gmeiner
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Exploring the activation pathway and Gi-coupling specificity of the μ-opioid receptor.

Authors:  Dibyendu Mondal; Vesselin Kolev; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Ligand binding free-energy calculations with funnel metadynamics.

Authors:  Stefano Raniolo; Vittorio Limongelli
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Quantum Mechanical and Molecular Mechanics Modeling of Membrane-Embedded Rhodopsins.

Authors:  Mikhail N Ryazantsev; Dmitrii M Nikolaev; Andrey V Struts; Michael F Brown
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 1.843

5.  Metadynamics as a Postprocessing Method for Virtual Screening with Application to the Pseudokinase Domain of JAK2.

Authors:  Kara J Cutrona; Ana S Newton; Stefan G Krimmer; Julian Tirado-Rives; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Binding of histamine to the H1 receptor-a molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  Christian A Söldner; Anselm H C Horn; Heinrich Sticht
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 7.  Insights from molecular dynamics simulations to exploit new trends for the development of improved opioid drugs.

Authors:  Marta Filizola
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Serotonergic Psychedelics: Experimental Approaches for Assessing Mechanisms of Action.

Authors:  Clinton E Canal
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2018

Review 9.  Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Drug-Target Binding by Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Sergio Decherchi; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 10.  Recent advances in computational studies of GPCR-G protein interactions.

Authors:  Jinan Wang; Yinglong Miao
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.