| Literature DB >> 28452944 |
Elias E Elemike1,2,3, Damian C Onwudiwe4,5, Anthony C Ekennia6, Christopher U Sonde7, Richard C Ehiri8.
Abstract
The health challenges associated with pathogens and ectoparasites highlight the need for effective control approaches. Metal nanoparticles have been proposed as highly effective tools towards combatting different microbial organisms and parasites. The present work reports the antimicrobial and larvicidal potential of biosynthesized Ag/Ag₂O nanoparticles using aqueous leaf extract of Eupatorium odoratum (EO). The constituents of the leaf extract act as both reducing and stabilizing agents. The UV-VIS spectra of the nanoparticles showed surface plasmon resonance. The particle size and shape of the nanoparticles was analysed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The larvicidal study was carried out using third and fourth instar Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. The mosquito larvae were exposed to varying concentrations of plant extract (EO) and the synthesized nanoparticles, and their percentage of mortality was accounted for at different time intervals of 12 h and 24 h periods of exposure. The nanoparticles were more lethal against third and fourth instars of Culex quinquefasciatus larvae at the 24 h period of exposure with lower lethal concentration values (LC50 = 95.9 ppm; LC90 = 337.5 ppm) and (LC50 = 166.4 ppm; LC90 = 438.7 ppm) compared to the plant extract (LC50 = 396.8 ppm; LC90 = 716.8 ppm and LC50 = 448.3 ppm; LC90 = 803.9 ppm, respectively). The antimicrobial properties of the nanoparticles were established against different clinically-isolated microbial strains and compared to that of the plant extract (EO) and standard antimicrobial drugs. The nanoparticles were generally more active than the plant extract against the selected microbial organisms. The Gram-negative bacterial strains Escheerichua coli and Salmonella typhi were more susceptible towards the nanoparticles compared to the Gram-positive strains and the fungal organism.Entities:
Keywords: Eupatorium odoratum; Nanoparticles; antimicrobial; larvicidal efficacy; silver
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28452944 PMCID: PMC6154600 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22050674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The UV-VIS spectra of the nanoparticles using plant leaf extract as the reducing agent: (a) the concentration of plant leaf extract to AgNO3 at a ratio of 1:5; and (b) the concentration of plant leaf extract to AgNO3 at a ratio of 1:10.
Figure 2Transmission electron microscopy image of the nanoparticles after 120 min synthesis time: (a) the concentration of the 1:5 extract to AgNO3 ratio; and (b) the concentration of the 1:10 extract to AgNO3 ratio.
Figure 3Representative PXRD patterns for the synthesized nanoparticles ( silver, silver oxide).
Scheme 1Proposed molecular binding of flavonoids (in EO) with silver ions during the reaction [59].
Larvicidal activity of the nanoparticles and EO aqueous leaf extract against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae.
| Sample | Larvae Instar | Conc. (ppm) | Exposure Time (h) | %Mortality ± Standard Error | LC50 (ppm) | LC90 (ppm) | χ2 (d = 4) (n.s.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EO-AgNPs | III | 50 | 12 | 34.67 ± 0.33 | 148.5 | 420.9 | 0.017 |
| 100 | 40.00 ± 0.58 | ||||||
| 150 | 46.67 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| 200 | 58.67 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| 250 | 70.67 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| 50 | 24 | 42.67 ± 0.33 | 95.9 | 337.5 | 0.983 | ||
| 100 | 49.33 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| 150 | 60.00 ± 1.16 | ||||||
| 200 | 68.00 ± 1.00 | ||||||
| 250 | 81.33 ± 0.88 | ||||||
| IV | 50 | 12 | 25.32 ± 0.67 | 217.1 | 483.8 | 0.585 | |
| 100 | 25.33 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| 150 | 33.33 ± 0.67 | ||||||
| 200 | 46.67 ± 0.67 | ||||||
| 250 | 60.00 ± 1.16 | ||||||
| 50 | 24 | 33.33 ± 0.33 | 166.4 | 438.7 | 1.111 | ||
| 100 | 34.67 ± 0.88 | ||||||
| 150 | 45.33 ± 0.88 | ||||||
| 200 | 49.33 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| 250 | 70.67 ± 0.88 | ||||||
| Plant Extract (EO) | III | 50 | 12 | 6.67 ± 0.33 | 461.6 | 807.6 | 0.013 |
| 100 | 9.33 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| 150 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | ||||||
| 200 | 14.67 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| 250 | 24.00 ± 0.58 | ||||||
| 50 | 24 | 8.00 ± 0.58 | 396.8 | 716.8 | 0.781 | ||
| 100 | 13.33 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| 150 | 16.00 ± 0.00 | ||||||
| 200 | 17.33 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| 250 | 30.67 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| IV | 50 | 12 | 5.32 ± 0.33 | 553.4 | 953.4 | 0.612 | |
| 100 | 8.00 ± 0.00 | ||||||
| 150 | 9.32 ± 0.33 | ||||||
| 200 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | ||||||
| 250 | 17.33 ± 0.67 | ||||||
| 50 | 24 | 9.33 ± 0.33 | 448.3 | 803.9 | 5.162 | ||
| 100 | 9.33 ± 0.67 | ||||||
| 150 | 12.00 ± 0.00 | ||||||
| 200 | 17.33 ± 0.67 | ||||||
| 250 | 26.67 ± 0.33 |
No mortality was observed in the control. LC50 = lethal concentration (ppm) that kills 50% of the exposed organisms; LC90 = lethal concentration (ppm) that kills 90% of the exposed organisms; χ2 = chi-square value; df = degrees of freedom; n.s. = not significant (p ˂ 0.05).
Figure 4Zones of inhibition of the samples against some micro-organisms.
MIC of the nanoparticles (Ag/Ag2ONPs).
| Microbial Strains | MIC |
|---|---|
| 75 μg/mL | |
| 75 μg/mL | |
| 40 μg/mL | |
| 25 μg/mL | |
| 100 μg/mL |
μg = microgram.