Literature DB >> 28452562

Risk factors of late cardiogenic shock and mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.

Laust Obling1, Martin Frydland1, Rikke Hansen2, Ole Kristian Møller-Helgestad2, Matias Greve Lindholm1, Lene Holmvang1, Hanne Berg Ravn3, Sebastian Wiberg1, Jakob Hartvig Thomsen1, Lisette Okkels Jensen2, Jesper Kjærgaard1, Jacob Eifer Møller2, Christian Hassager1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of cardiogenic shock (CS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is as high as 10%. The majority of patients are thought to develop CS after admission (late CS), but the incidence in a contemporary STEMI cohort admitted for primary percutaneous intervention remains unknown. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and time of CS onset in patients with suspected STEMI admitted in two high-volume tertiary heart centres and to assess the variables associated with the development of late CS.
METHODS: We included consecutive patients admitted for acute coronary angiography with suspected STEMI in a 1-year period. Cardiogenic shock was based on clinical criteria and subdivided into patients with shock on admission, patients developing shock during catheterisation and patients developing shock later during hospitalisation. Follow-up for all-cause mortality was done using registries.
RESULTS: A total of 2247 patients with suspected STEMI were included, whereof 225 (10%) developed CS. The majority (56%) had CS on admission, 16% developed CS in the catheterisation laboratory and 28% developed late CS. Thirty-day mortality was 3.1% versus 47% in non-CS versus CS patients ( plogrank < 0.0001). Age, stroke, time from symptom onset to intervention, anterior STEMI, heart rate/systolic blood pressure ratio and being comatose after resuscitation from cardiac arrest were independently associated with the development of late CS.
CONCLUSION: In this study, 10% of patients admitted with suspected STEMI for acute coronary angiography presented with or developed CS. Most were in shock on admission. Irrespective of the timing of shock, mortality was high.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiogenic shock; STEMI; mortality; prediction; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28452562     DOI: 10.1177/2048872617706503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care        ISSN: 2048-8726


  11 in total

1.  Predictive value of the baseline electrocardiogram ST-segment pattern in cardiogenic shock: Results from the CardShock Study.

Authors:  Tuija Javanainen; Heli Tolppanen; Johan Lassus; Markku S Nieminen; Alessandro Sionis; Jindrich Spinar; José Silva-Cardoso; Matias Greve Lindholm; Marek Banaszewski; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Raija Jurkko
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Blood Urea Nitrogen for Short-Term Prognosis in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Yuansong Zhu; Bryan Richard Sasmita; Xiankang Hu; Yuzhou Xue; Hongbo Gan; Zhenxian Xiang; Yi Jiang; Bi Huang; Suxin Luo
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.149

Review 3.  Impact of diabetes on outcomes of cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chao Luo; Feng Chen; Lingpei Liu; Zuanmin Ge; Chengzhen Feng; Yuehua Chen
Journal:  Diab Vasc Dis Res       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.541

4.  Comparison of the prognosis for different onset stage of cardiogenic shock secondary to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Shuaihua Qiao; Jingmei Zhang; Zhenzhen Kong; Han Wu; Rong Gu; Hongyan Zheng; Biao Xu; Zhonghai Wei
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Clinical characteristics and outcome in patients with a delayed presentation after ST-elevation myocardial infarction and complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Yash Paul Sharma; Darshan Krishnappa; Kewal Kanabar; Ganesh Kasinadhuni; Rakesh Sharma; Kamal Kishore; Saurabh Mehrotra; Krishna Santosh; Ankur Gupta; Prashant Panda
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2019-11-21

6.  Hemodynamic and metabolic recovery in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock is more rapid among patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Jakob Josiassen; Ole Kristian Lerche Helgestad; Jacob Eifer Møller; Jesper Kjaergaard; Henrik Frederiksen Hoejgaard; Henrik Schmidt; Lisette Okkels Jensen; Lene Holmvang; Hanne Berg Ravn; Christian Hassager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Early Prediction of Cardiogenic Shock Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Yale Chang; Corneliu Antonescu; Shreyas Ravindranath; Junzi Dong; Mingyu Lu; Francesco Vicario; Lisa Wondrely; Pam Thompson; Dennis Swearingen; Deepak Acharya
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-13

8.  Study on the predictive ability of emergency CHADS2 score and CHA2DS2-VASc score for coronary artery disease and prognosis in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Hong Lv; Zeyan Liu; Yuan Liu; Xue Yang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.005

9.  The value of shock index in prediction of cardiogenic shock developed during primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Zhonghai Wei; Jian Bai; Qing Dai; Han Wu; Shuaihua Qiao; Biao Xu; Lian Wang
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 10.  Risk stratification in cardiogenic shock: a focus on the available evidence.

Authors:  C Sciaccaluga; G E Mandoli; N Ghionzoli; F Anselmi; C Sorini Dini; F Righini; F Cesareo; F D'Ascenzi; M Focardi; S Valente; M Cameli
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.