Lisa J Moran1,2, Angela C Flynn3,4, Jennie Louise1,5, Andrea R Deussen1, Jodie M Dodd1,6. 1. The Robinson Research Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 2. Monash Centre for Health Research Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. 3. Division of Women's Health, King's College London, London, UK. 4. Division of Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. 5. The University of Adelaide, School of Public Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. 6. Women's and Babies Division, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Optimizing maternal diet during pregnancy improves maternal and infant health. This study assessed the effect of an antenatal lifestyle intervention for women with overweight or obesity on dietary patterns during pregnancy and post partum. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial in which pregnant women (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 ) receivedlifestyle advice (n = 943) or standard care (n = 924). Dietary pattern analysis was undertaken using factor analysis with comparisons between trial entry and 28 weeks, 36 weeks, and 4 months post partum. RESULTS: The dietary pattern analysis revealed two distinct patterns: "prudent" and "Western." There was a significant difference between groups in the change over time for both patterns (P < 0.001). For the prudent score, the lifestyle group had higher scores at all times after trial entry compared with standard care, while for the Western score, the lifestyle group had a lower score at 28 weeks. The intervention effect differed based on trial entry BMI (P = 0.043) and smoking (P = 0.019), with higher prudent scores for women with obesity compared with overweight and smokers compared with nonsmokers. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of an antenatal lifestyle intervention for women with overweight and obesity was associated with an improvement in dietary patterns that persisted post partum. This has important implications for the future consideration of optimal dietary intervention components to include in antenatal lifestyle interventions.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Optimizing maternal diet during pregnancy improves maternal and infant health. This study assessed the effect of an antenatal lifestyle intervention for women with overweight or obesity on dietary patterns during pregnancy and post partum. METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial in which pregnant women (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 ) received lifestyle advice (n = 943) or standard care (n = 924). Dietary pattern analysis was undertaken using factor analysis with comparisons between trial entry and 28 weeks, 36 weeks, and 4 months post partum. RESULTS: The dietary pattern analysis revealed two distinct patterns: "prudent" and "Western." There was a significant difference between groups in the change over time for both patterns (P < 0.001). For the prudent score, the lifestyle group had higher scores at all times after trial entry compared with standard care, while for the Western score, the lifestyle group had a lower score at 28 weeks. The intervention effect differed based on trial entry BMI (P = 0.043) and smoking (P = 0.019), with higher prudent scores for women with obesity compared with overweight and smokers compared with nonsmokers. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of an antenatal lifestyle intervention for women with overweight and obesity was associated with an improvement in dietary patterns that persisted post partum. This has important implications for the future consideration of optimal dietary intervention components to include in antenatal lifestyle interventions.
Authors: Jade A McNamara; Noereem Z Mena; Arrington Wright; Makenzie L Barr Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-11 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Tessa M van Elten; Matty D A Karsten; Anouk Geelen; Anne M van Oers; Mireille N M van Poppel; Henk Groen; Reinoud J B J Gemke; Ben Willem Mol; Meike A Q Mutsaerts; Tessa J Roseboom; Annemieke Hoek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Samantha M Garay; Katrina A Savory; Lorna Sumption; Richard Penketh; Anna B Janssen; Rosalind M John Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hashem Salarzadeh Jenatabadi; Nadia Samsudin; Che Wan Jasimah Bt Wan Mohamed Radzi Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Carla Assaf-Balut; Nuria Garcia de la Torre; Alejandra Durán; Elena Bordiu; Laura Del Valle; Cristina Familiar; Johanna Valerio; Inés Jimenez; Miguel Angel Herraiz; Nuria Izquierdo; Isabelle Runkle; María Paz de Miguel; Carmen Montañez; Ana Barabash; Martín Cuesta; Miguel Angel Rubio; Alfonso Luis Calle-Pascual Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 4.241