Literature DB >> 28452048

Artificial light at night alters trophic interactions of intertidal invertebrates.

Charlotte N Underwood1,2, Thomas W Davies2, Ana M Queirós3.   

Abstract

Despite being globally widespread in coastal regions, the impacts of light pollution on intertidal ecosystems has received little attention. Intertidal species exhibit many night-time-dependent ecological strategies, including feeding, reproduction, orientation and predator avoidance, which are likely negatively affected by shifting light regimes, as has been observed in terrestrial and aquatic taxa. Coastal lighting may shape intertidal communities through its influence on the nocturnal foraging activity of dogwhelks (Nucella lapillus), a widespread predatory mollusc that structures biodiversity in temperate rocky shores. In the laboratory, we investigated whether the basal and foraging activity of this predator was affected by exposure to night-time lighting both in the presence and absence of olfactory predator cues (Carcinus maenas, common shore crab). Assessments of dogwhelks' behavioural responses to night-time white LED lighting were performed on individuals that had been acclimated to night-time white LED lighting conditions for 16 days and individuals that had not previously been exposed to artificial light at night. Dogwhelks acclimated to night-time lighting exhibited natural refuge-seeking behaviour less often compared to control animals, but were more likely to respond to and handle prey irrespective of whether olfactory predator cues were present. These responses suggest night-time lighting likely increased the energetic demand of dogwhelks through stress, encouraging foraging whenever food was available, regardless of potential danger. Contrastingly, whelks not acclimated under night-time lighting were more likely to respond to the presence of prey under artificial light at night when olfactory predator cues were present, indicating an opportunistic shift towards the use of visual instead of olfactory cues in risk evaluation. These results demonstrate that artificial night-time lighting influences the behaviour of intertidal fauna such that the balance of interspecific interactions involved in community structuring may be affected.
© 2017 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2017 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LEDs; artificial light at night; intertidal ecosystems; light pollution; predation; rocky shores; species interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28452048     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  11 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Enric Frago; Rachel Kehoe; Christophe Patterson; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 2.  Artificial night light alters ecosystem services provided by biotic components.

Authors:  Rajesh K Singhal; Jyoti Chauhan; Hanuman S Jatav; Vishnu D Rajput; Gopal S Singh; Bandana Bose
Journal:  Biol Futur       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 3.  Exposure to Artificial Light at Night and the Consequences for Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems.

Authors:  Jack Falcón; Alicia Torriglia; Dina Attia; Françoise Viénot; Claude Gronfier; Francine Behar-Cohen; Christophe Martinsons; David Hicks
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Wavelength-dependent effects of artificial light at night on phytoplankton growth and community structure.

Authors:  Christina Diamantopoulou; Eleni Christoforou; Davide M Dominoni; Eirini Kaiserli; Jakub Czyzewski; Nosrat Mirzai; Sofie Spatharis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.530

5.  Artificial night light alters nocturnal prey interception outcomes for morphologically variable spiders.

Authors:  Suet Wai Yuen; Timothy C Bonebrake
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Biologically important artificial light at night on the seafloor.

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; David McKee; James Fishwick; Svenja Tidau; Tim Smyth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Light pollution affects space use and interaction of two small mammal species irrespective of personality.

Authors:  Julia Hoffmann; Annika Schirmer; Jana Anja Eccard
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.964

8.  Red Sea corals under Artificial Light Pollution at Night (ALAN) undergo oxidative stress and photosynthetic impairment.

Authors:  Inbal Ayalon; Laura F de Barros Marangoni; Jennifer I C Benichou; Dror Avisar; Oren Levy
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Fiddler crab electroretinograms reveal vast circadian shifts in visual sensitivity and temporal summation in dim light.

Authors:  Emelie A Brodrick; Martin J How; Jan M Hemmi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Artificial light at night reverses monthly foraging pattern under simulated moonlight.

Authors:  Svenja Tidau; Jack Whittle; Stuart R Jenkins; Thomas W Davies
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.812

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.