Literature DB >> 28451729

[Robotic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy : Video article].

H Aselmann1, J Hendrik Egberts2, J Henrik Beckmann2, H Stein3, C Schafmayer2, S Hinz2, B Reichert2, T Becker2.   

Abstract

Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy is one of the most complex procedures in general surgery. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy was initially described in 1994; however, its worldwide distribution is so far limited to only a few specialist centers. Robotic surgery using the DaVinci® system can overcome many limitations of laparoscopic surgery. The system is a promising tool for a more widespread introduction of minimally invasive surgery for pancreatic diseases. Mortality rates of 0-5% and pancreatic fistula rates of 0-35% are described in the literature; therefore, thorough complication management is crucial in the postoperative course. The video presents a robotic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma in a female patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication management; DaVinci system; Laparoscopy; Mortality; Pancreatic fistula rate

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28451729     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-017-0414-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  14 in total

1.  A Multi-institutional Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; Lauren M Postlewait; Yuan Liu; Theresa W Gillespie; Sharon M Weber; Daniel E Abbott; Syed A Ahmad; Shishir K Maithel; Melissa E Hogg; Mazen Zenati; Clifford S Cho; Ahmed Salem; Brent Xia; Jennifer Steve; Trang K Nguyen; Hari B Keshava; Sricharan Chalikonda; R Matthew Walsh; Mark S Talamonti; Susan J Stocker; David J Bentrem; Stephanie Lumpkin; Hong J Kim; Herbert J Zeh; David A Kooby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Marchegiani; Christos Dervenis; Micheal Sarr; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Mustapha Adham; Peter Allen; Roland Andersson; Horacio J Asbun; Marc G Besselink; Kevin Conlon; Marco Del Chiaro; Massimo Falconi; Laureano Fernandez-Cruz; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Abe Fingerhut; Helmut Friess; Dirk J Gouma; Thilo Hackert; Jakob Izbicki; Keith D Lillemoe; John P Neoptolemos; Attila Olah; Richard Schulick; Shailesh V Shrikhande; Tadahiro Takada; Kyoichi Takaori; William Traverso; Charles R Vollmer; Christopher L Wolfgang; Charles J Yeo; Roberto Salvia; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  A policy of omitting an intensive care unit stay after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and cost-effective.

Authors:  Kellie E Cunningham; Mazen S Zenati; Jonathan R Petrie; Jennifer L Steve; Melissa E Hogg; Herbert J Zeh; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Robotic extended pancreatectomy with vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic tumors.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Pietro Addeo; Nicolas Christian Buchs; Subhashini M Ayloo; Francesco Maria Bianco
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after pancreaticoduodenectomy is more prevalent with pancreaticogastrostomy than with pancreaticojejunostomy. A retrospective multicentre observational cohort study.

Authors:  Geert Roeyen; Miet Jansen; Laure Ruyssinck; Thiery Chapelle; Aude Vanlander; Bart Bracke; Vera Hartman; Dirk Ysebaert; Frederik Berrevoet
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 6.  Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Mingjun Wang; He Cai; Lingwei Meng; Yunqiang Cai; Xin Wang; Yongbin Li; Bing Peng
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.071

7.  Robotic Lymphadenectomy During Pancreatoduodenectomy with First Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection.

Authors:  R Memeo; V De Blasi; O Perotto; D Mutter; J Marescaux; P Pessaux
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Falciform ligament flap for the protection of the gastroduodenal artery stump after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single center experience.

Authors:  S Ray; S Sanyal; S Ghatak; P K Sonar; S Das; S Khamrui; G Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Visc Surg       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.043

Review 10.  Antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction after partial pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Felix J Hüttner; Rosa Klotz; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-30
View more
  3 in total

1.  [Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic gastric bypass : First experiences with the DaVinci system in bariatric surgery].

Authors:  J H Beckmann; H Aselmann; J H Egberts; A Bernsmeier; M Laudes; T Becker; C Schafmayer; M Ahrens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Using the da Vinci X® - System for Esophageal Surgery.

Authors:  Juri Bergmann; Barbara Lehmann-Dorl; Lars Witt; Heiko Aselmann
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.789

Review 3.  Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Procedure Guide.

Authors:  Jan-Niclas Kersebaum; Thorben Möller; Witigo von Schönfels; Terbish Taivankhuu; Thomas Becker; Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Jan Henrik Beckmann
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.