Literature DB >> 27451861

A policy of omitting an intensive care unit stay after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is safe and cost-effective.

Kellie E Cunningham1, Mazen S Zenati2, Jonathan R Petrie3, Jennifer L Steve1, Melissa E Hogg1, Herbert J Zeh1, Amer H Zureikat4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immediate postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is still a standard practice at many institutions. Our aim was to examine whether omission of an immediate postoperative ICU admission would be safe and result in improved outcomes and cost after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD).
METHODS: In December 2014, a non-ICU admission policy was implemented for patients undergoing RPD. Before this date, all RPDs were routinely admitted to the ICU on post operative day = 0. Using a prospective database, outcomes of the patients in the no-ICU cohort were compared with those of the patients routinely admitted to the ICU before implementation of this policy.
RESULTS: The ICU (n = 49) and no-ICU cohorts (n = 47) were comparable in age, gender, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, receipt of neoadjuvant therapy, operative time, estimated blood loss, tumor size, and pathologic diagnosis (all P values = NS). Clavien complications, pancreatic leak, reoperation, readmission, and mortality were similar between both the groups (all P values = NS). Hospital length of stay (LOS) was shorter for the no-ICU group (median 6.8 versus 7.7 d, P = 0.01). This reduced LOS and omission of routine postoperative ICU admission translated into a cost reduction from $23,933 (interquartile range $19,833-$28,991) in the ICU group to $19,516 (interquartile range $17,046-$23,893) in the no-ICU group, P = 0.004. The reduction in LOS and cost remained significant after adjusting for all related demographics and perioperative characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: A standard policy of omitting a postoperative ICU admission on post operative day 0 after RPD is safe and can result in reduced LOS and overall savings in total hospital cost.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; ICU; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Robotic; Whipple

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27451861     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  7 in total

Review 1.  Total robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Michail Kornaropoulos; Demetrios Moris; Eliza W Beal; Marinos C Makris; Apostolos Mitrousias; Athanasios Petrou; Evangelos Felekouras; Adamantios Michalinos; Michail Vailas; Dimitrios Schizas; Alexandros Papalampros
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Robot-assisted pancreatic resection].

Authors:  B Müssle; M Distler; J Weitz; T Welsch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [Robotic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy : Video article].

Authors:  H Aselmann; J Hendrik Egberts; J Henrik Beckmann; H Stein; C Schafmayer; S Hinz; B Reichert; T Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  [Minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery for pancreatic cystic tumors].

Authors:  T Welsch; M Distler; J Weitz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Robotic vascular resections during Whipple procedure.

Authors:  Bassan J Allan; Stephanie M Novak; Melissa E Hogg; Herbert J Zeh
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-01-17

Review 6.  Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yu Pan; Xiao-Long Liu; Guang-Yi Jiang; Di Wu; Hendi Maher; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Standardization of perioperative care facilitates safe discharge by postoperative day five after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sara K Daniel; Lucas W Thornblade; Gary N Mann; James O Park; Venu G Pillarisetty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.