Literature DB >> 28451705

Demonstration of a box-stitch technique for laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension.

Allison M Wyman1, Lindsey Hahn2, Emad Mikhail2, Stuart Hart2.   

Abstract

AIM: We demonstrate a novel box stitch technique of laparoscopic post-hysterectomy uterosacral ligament suspension for apical prolapse in restorative pelvic reconstructive surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a case of a 58yo female with symptomatic stage III pelvic organ prolapse with a history of a total abdominal hysterectomy 30 years prior. She strongly desired the usage of no synthetic or biologic mesh for her restorative surgical repair. This video provides a step-by-step guide on how to perform a laparoscopic box stitch as a technique for uterosacral ligament suspension as an apical native tissue option for patients with the need for post hysterectomy apical prolapse.
CONCLUSION: This video demonstrates a novel box-stitch technique of laparoscopic post-hysterectomy uterosacral ligament suspension as a native tissue option for minimally invasive reconstructive surgery. The procedure is a reasonable option to address apical prolapse in patients who do not desire or who are unable to have synthetic or biologic mesh placed for restorative reconstructive prolapse surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apical prolapse; Laparoscopic; Native tissue repair

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28451705     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3335-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  6 in total

1.  Laparoscopic vaginal vault suspension using uterosacral ligaments: a review of 133 cases.

Authors:  Lawrence L Lin; John Y Phelps; C Y Liu
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension and sacral colpopexy: results and complications.

Authors:  Gilad A Filmar; Hilaire W Fisher; Enrique Aranda; Peter M Lotze
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Uterosacral colpopexy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of laparoscopic and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Charles R Rardin; Elisabeth A Erekson; Vivian W Sung; Renee M Ward; Deborah L Myers
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Lindsay C Turner; Erin S Lavelle; Jonathan P Shepherd
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Subjective and Objective Outcomes of Robotic and Vaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.

Authors:  Vaneesha Vallabh-Patel; Cristina Saiz; Charbel Salamon
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  Estimated levator ani subtended volume: a novel assay for predicting surgical failure after uterosacral ligament suspension.

Authors:  Allison M Wyman; Antonio A Rodrigues; Lindsey Hahn; Kristie A Greene; Renee Bassaly; Stuart Hart; Branko Miladinovic; Lennox Hoyte
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 8.661

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.