Literature DB >> 26596232

Estimated levator ani subtended volume: a novel assay for predicting surgical failure after uterosacral ligament suspension.

Allison M Wyman1, Antonio A Rodrigues2, Lindsey Hahn3, Kristie A Greene4, Renee Bassaly3, Stuart Hart3, Branko Miladinovic3, Lennox Hoyte3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Levator ani muscle complex plays an important role in pelvic support and defects or laxity in this muscle complex contributes to pelvic organ prolapse and recurrence after surgical repair.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether estimated levator ani subtended volume can predict surgical outcomes for laparoscopic bilateral uterosacral ligament suspension. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed in patients who underwent laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension from 2010-2012. Only patients with a preoperative pelvic magnetic resonance image were included. Surgical failure was defined as a composite score that included the presence of anatomic bulge beyond the hymen with sensation of vaginal bulge or repeat treatment for prolapse via pessary or surgery by 1-year follow-up evaluation. Standard protocol pelvic magnetic resonance imaging measurements pubococcygeal line, H-line, and M-line were collected along with the calculation of the width of the levator ani hiatus. Estimated levator ani subtended volume was calculated for each subject. An optimal cutoff point was calculated and compared against categoric values of surgical success/failure. A Fisher exact test, an area under receiver operating characteristics curve, and logistic regression analysis were performed. A probability value of <.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Ninety-three women underwent laparoscopic bilateral uterosacral ligament suspension during study period. Of these, 66 women had a standardized preoperative pelvic magnetic resonance image per institutional protocol. Thirteen patients (19.6%) met the criteria for surgical failure by 1 year. An optimal cutoff point of 38.5 was calculated by Liu's method for optimization. Among the patients with defined surgical failures, 84.6% (11/13) had an estimated levator ani subtended volume above cutoff point of 38.5. Among the patients with defined surgical success, 39.6% (21/53) had an estimated levator ani subtended volume above the cutoff point (84.6% vs 39.6%; P = .0048) with a significant odds ratio of 8.38 (95% confidence interval, 1.69-41.68; P = .009). An area under receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.725 (95% confidence interval, 0.603-0.847), sensitivity of 84.6% (95% confidence interval, 54.6%-98.1%), and specificity of 60.4% (95% confidence interval, 46%-73.5%) at 38.5 were predictors of surgical success/failure by 1 year. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated no significant confounders among age, body mass index, stage, or parity.
CONCLUSIONS: Estimated levator ani subtended volume may predict surgical failure for laparoscopic bilateral uterosacral ligament suspension. Patients with a calculated estimated levator ani subtended volume above 38.5 on a preoperative pelvic magnetic resonance imaging were associated with an increased risk for surgical failure by 1 year, regardless of age, body mass index, stage, or parity. Future investigation that will include repeatability, reliability analysis, and a prospective study is warranted.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  levator ani muscle; levator ani subtended volume; magnetic resonance imaging; pelvic organ prolapse; surgical outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26596232     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  4 in total

1.  Levator bowl volume during straining and its relationship to other levator measures.

Authors:  Lahari Nandikanti; Anne G Sammarco; Luyun Chen; James A Ashton-Miller; John O DeLancey
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Interactions among pelvic organ protrusion, levator ani descent, and hiatal enlargement in women with and without prolapse.

Authors:  Anne G Sammarco; Lahari Nandikanti; Emily K Kobernik; Bing Xie; Alexandra Jankowski; Carolyn W Swenson; John O L DeLancey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Demonstration of a box-stitch technique for laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension.

Authors:  Allison M Wyman; Lindsey Hahn; Emad Mikhail; Stuart Hart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs. Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Campagna; Lorenzo Vacca; Giovanni Panico; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Daniela Caramazza; Riccardo Zaccoletti; Monia Marturano; Roberta Granese; Martina Arcieri; Stefano Cianci; Giovanni Scambia; Alfredo Ercoli
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.