Vijayapandi Pandy1, Megala Narasingam1, Kamini Vijeepallam1, Syam Mohan2, Vasudevan Mani3, Zahurin Mohamed1. 1. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2. Medical Research Centre, Jazan University, Jazan, 11420, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 3. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, P.O. Box 6800, Buraidah, 51452, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
In earlier ex vivo studies, we reported the biphasic effect of a methanolic extract of unripe Morinda citrifolia fruit (MMC) on dopamine-induced contractility in isolated rat vas deferens preparations. The present in vivo study was designed and undertaken to further explore our earlier ex vivo findings. This study examined the effect of the ethyl acetate fraction of a methanolic extract of unripe Morinda citrifolia Linn. fruit (EA-MMC; 5-100 mg/kg, p.o.) on the dopaminergic system using mouse models of apomorphine-induced climbing time and climbing behavior, methamphetamine-induced stereotypy (sniffing, biting, gnawing, and licking) and haloperidol-induced catalepsy using the bar test. Acute treatment with EA-MMC at a low dose (25 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly attenuated the apomorphine-induced climbing time and climbing behavior in mice. Similarly, EA-MMC (5 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly inhibited methamphetamine-induced stereotyped behavior in mice. These results demonstrated that the antidopaminergic effect of EA-MMC was observed at relatively lower doses (<25 mg/kg, p.o.). On the other hand, EA-MMC showed dopaminergic agonistic activity at a high dose (3,000 mg/kg, p.o.), which was evident from alleviation of haloperidol (a dopamine D2 blocker)-induced catalepsy in mice. Therefore, it is concluded that EA-MMC might possess a biphasic effect on the dopaminergic system, i.e., an antagonistic effect at lower doses (<25 mg/kg, p.o.) and an agonistic effect at higher doses (>1,000 mg/kg, p.o.). However, further receptor-ligand binding assays are necessary to confirm the biphasic effects of M. citrifolia fruit on the dopaminergic system.
In earlier ex vivo studies, we reported the biphasic effect of a methanolic extract of unripe Morinda citrifolia fruit (MMC) on dopamine-induced contractility in isolated rat vas deferens preparations. The present in vivo study was designed and undertaken to further explore our earlier ex vivo findings. This study examined the effect of the ethyl acetate fraction of a methanolic extract of unripe Morinda citrifolia Linn. fruit (EA-MMC; 5-100 mg/kg, p.o.) on the dopaminergic system using mouse models of apomorphine-induced climbing time and climbing behavior, methamphetamine-induced stereotypy (sniffing, biting, gnawing, and licking) and haloperidol-induced catalepsy using the bar test. Acute treatment with EA-MMC at a low dose (25 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly attenuated the apomorphine-induced climbing time and climbing behavior in mice. Similarly, EA-MMC (5 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly inhibited methamphetamine-induced stereotyped behavior in mice. These results demonstrated that the antidopaminergic effect of EA-MMC was observed at relatively lower doses (<25 mg/kg, p.o.). On the other hand, EA-MMC showed dopaminergic agonistic activity at a high dose (3,000 mg/kg, p.o.), which was evident from alleviation of haloperidol (a dopamine D2 blocker)-induced catalepsy in mice. Therefore, it is concluded that EA-MMC might possess a biphasic effect on the dopaminergic system, i.e., an antagonistic effect at lower doses (<25 mg/kg, p.o.) and an agonistic effect at higher doses (>1,000 mg/kg, p.o.). However, further receptor-ligand binding assays are necessary to confirm the biphasic effects of M. citrifolia fruit on the dopaminergic system.
Noni is the common name for Morinda citrifolia Linn, but it is also known
as Nono or Nonu, Ba Ji Tian, Indian Mulberry, Nahu, and Cheese Fruit among diverse cultures
all over the world. It has been used extensively by the Polynesians in folk medicine for
many years. It is normally cultivated in tropical regions for its roots, leaves, and fruits.
In recent years, noni fruit juice has attained a great deal of interest globally for its
nutritional and/or medicinal value, and it is commercially marketed as a health drink in
many countries, including Malaysia, China, and India.Extensive preclinical studies using fruit, leaf, and root extracts of noni have been
reported regarding their efficacy in many ailments including CNS disorders such as anxiety
[7], epilepsy [18], and Alzheimer’s disease [17].
Recently, we reported the antipsychotic-like activity of a methanolic extract of unripe
M. citrifolia fruit (MMC) in mouse models of
apomorphine/methamphetamine-induced cage climbing/stereotypy behavior which demonstrated the
antidopaminergic effect of noni fruit [21].
Similarly, Ekpalakorn et al. revealed that a decoction or infusions of
roasted mature unripe fruits were effective for relieving the symptoms of nausea and
vomiting [8]. According to Traditional Chinese
Medicine (TCM), noni is adequate for clearing heat and toxins, invigorating the blood, and
tonifying Qi [28]. It has also been reported that a
noni fruit extract exhibited prokinetic and antiemetic activity as deduced by a delay in
intestinal transit time caused by apomorphine (a potent agonist of the dopamine
D2 receptor) in mice and an effect on the apomorphine-induced emesis in dogs
respectively [4], suggesting that noni might contain a
weak antidopaminergic component responsible for the observed effects.Conversely, administration of the ethyl acetate fraction of a crude methanolic extract of
M. citrifolia (EA-MMC) at a daily dose of 400 mg/kg for 15 days
significantly enhanced the levels of monoamines including dopamine in rats [18]. It has been suggested that the opposing effects of
M. citrifolia fruit extracts on the dopaminergic system could be due to
differences in the doses used in previous studies [21]. In an earlier study, we examined the effect of a noni fruit extract (MMC) on
dopamine-induced contractile response using isolated rat vas deferens preparations and
revealed the biphasic effect of MMC on the dopaminergic system, that is, an antidopaminergic
effect at lower concentrations (<40 mg/ml) and dopaminergic agonistic effect at higher
concentrations (>60 mg/ml) [22]. The results of
that study also revealed the antidopaminergic effect of scopoletin (100
µg/ml), and rutin hydrate (156 µg/ml). Moreover, it has
been suggested that scopoletin and/or rutin might also be responsible for the
antidopaminergic effect of MMC [21]. In earlier
phytochemical investigations of a crude ethanolic extract of M. citrifolia
fruit and its different fractions, namely, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and butanol fractions,
it was revealed that the ethyl acetate fraction possessed a major content of rutin,
scopoletin, and quercetin [20]. Therefore, the ethyl
acetate fraction of a methanolic extract of unripe M. citrifolia fruit
(EA-MMC) was chosen to be investigated further in the present study.In order to strengthen our earlier ex vivo study findings, this in
vivo work was undertaken to elucidate the neuromodulatory effect of EA-MMC on the
dopaminergic system using mouse models, apomorphine/methamphetamine-induced
climbing/stereotypy (sniffing, biting, gnawing, and licking) for antidopaminergic activity
and haloperidol-induced catalepsy for dopaminergic agonistic activity.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Male ICR mice weighing 25–30 g were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center,
University of Malaya. Mice were housed and acclimatized in cages (four per cage) in a
temperature- and light-controlled vivarium (22 ± 1°C, 12-h light-dark cycle, lights on/off
at 7 a.m./7 p.m.). The animals were fed standard food pellets and water ad
libitum. Behavioral testing was conducted during the light phase. All
experiments were conducted in accordance with the Council for International Organization
of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) on animal experimentation, guidelines [10] and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC),
University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (ACUC Ethics No. FAR/27/01/2012/PV (R)).
Drugs
R-(−)-Apomorphine hydrochloride hemihydrate and sodium metabisulphite (Sigma-Aldrich, St.
Louis, MO, USA), methamphetamine hydrochloride (a generous gift from the Department of
Chemistry, Ministry of Health, Malaysia), and haloperidol (Manace® Injection, CCM
Duopharma (M) SDN BHD, Malaysia) were used. All drugs were freshly prepared using normal
sterile saline except for apomorphine (prepared with normal saline containing sodium
metabisulphite 0.125% w/v) and EA-MMC, which were suspended in 1% w/v sodium carboxymethyl
cellulose (CMC) solution. All drugs were administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) except for
EA-MMC. EA-MMC was administered by oral gavage (p.o.). The drug stock solutions were
prepared so that the necessary doses were injected at a constant volume of 1 ml/100 g body
weight of the animal.
Plant material
The fresh unripe fruit of M. citrifolia used in this study was harvested
in Malacca, Malaysia, in January 2012. The species was authenticated by Rimba Ilmu,
Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya. A voucher specimen (KLU 47738) was
deposited for future reference. The authenticated fruits were cut into thin slices and
shade dried at room temperature.
Extraction and fractionation
The shade-dried plant material (1.8 kg) was ground into powder with the aid of an
electric blender. The powdered fruits were extracted with 10 l of methanol (Scharlau,
Spain; isocratic HPLC grade) by soaking for 20 h followed by sonication using a water-bath
sonicator at 30°C for another 4 h. The resultant solution was evaporated under vacuum in a
rotary evaporator to obtain a dry mass of M. citrifoliamethanolic
extract (MMC). In a recent report, we demonstrated the phytochemical characterization of
MMC [22]. The obtained MMC was dissolved in
distilled water and then further partitioned with ethyl acetate using a separating funnel.
The ethyl acetate-soluble fraction (EA-MMC) was later evaporated to obtain a dry mass
extract (yield: 9.04% w/w) and stored at 4°C until further use.
Treatments
Mice were randomly divided into different treatment groups (n=6–8). In a study to
evaluate the antidopaminergic activity of EA-MMC, the saline control group received 1% w/v
CMC solution orally one hour prior to intraperitoneal saline administration, the vehicle
group received 1% w/v CMC solution orally one hour prior to apomorphine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) or
methamphetamine injection (5 mg/kg, i.p.), and the test groups received relatively lower
doses of EA-MMC (5, 10, 25, 50 or 100 mg/kg, p.o.) one hour prior to apomorphine (5 mg/kg,
i.p.) or methamphetamine (5 mg/kg, i.p.) injection.In another study, which examined the dopaminergic agonistic activity, the saline control
group received 1% w/v CMC solution orally one hour prior to intraperitoneal saline
administration, the vehicle group received 1% w/v CMC solution orally one hour prior to
haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), and the test groups received EA-MMC at relatively higher
doses (500, 750, 1,000, or 3,000 mg/kg, p.o.) one hour prior to haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg,
i.p.) injection. All the drugs were administered at a constant dose volume of 1 ml/100 g
body weight of mice.
Behavioral assessment
Apomorphine-induced cage climbing in mice: Apomorphine-treated mice showed a peculiar
climbing behavior characterized by rearing and then spontaneous climbing activity [5]. The apparatus, procedure, and scoring pattern used
to evaluate climbing behavior were the same as described in our previous study [21]. Immediately after administration of apomorphine,
the animals were placed into the corresponding metal cages and examined for climbing
behavior. An observer who was blind to drug treatment determined the total climbing time
for 30 min after apomorphine treatment. During this period, the climbing behavior on the
wall of the cage was scored at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min after apomorphine
administration, and the cumulative climbing index was determined. The maximum possible
cumulative climbing index is 24.
Methamphetamine-induced stereotypy in mice
The procedure and apparatus used in the present study were the same as described in our
previous report [21] and other reports [23], with slight modifications. The mice were initially
acclimatized for 15 min in the test apparatus and then received methamphetamine (METH)
intraperitoneally. The METH-treated animals were placed back inside the cage at its base.
The intensity of stereotyped behavior of individual mice was scored at 15-min intervals
for a period of 60 min as described in our previous report [21].
Haloperidol-induced catalepsy in mice
Catalepsy is one of the characteristic features of Parkinson’s disease. The reduced
ability to initiate movement and difficulty in attempting to correct posture are the most
common features of catalepsy. In rodents, catalepsy can be easily measured by the bar test
[19]. The intensity of catalepsy was measured
using the standard bar hanging method by placing naive mice with both forepaws over a
horizontal bar (diameter: 3 mm), that was elevated 4.5 cm from the floor [24]. The time at which the forepaws of the mouse
touched the floor or climbed over the bar was considered an end point of catalepsy. The
catalepsy time (s) was measured 30 and 60 min after haloperidol administration, with a
maximum cutoff time of 180 s. The test was repeated three times with an intertrial
interval of 1 min. After measurement of catalepsy, animals were returned to their home
cages. The experimenter was unaware of the treatments given to the mice in all behavioral
studies.
Statistical analysis
The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM The statistical significance of differences
between groups was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by
post hoc comparison using Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Stereotyped
behavior was analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test
because nonparametric statistics are needed with all or none or rating scale scores. All
data analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism 5 statistical software. A level of
P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Effect of EA-MMC on apomorphine-induced climbing behavior and methamphetamine-induced
stereotypy in mice
ANOVA results revealed a significant effect of EA-MMC on apomorphine-induced climbing
behavior [F (6, 35)=4.807; P<0.01] and climbing time [F (6, 35)=4.601;
P<0.01] as shown in Figs.
1a and 1b. The maximum inhibitory effect of EA-MMC on climbing behavior and climbing time was
observed at 25 mg/kg. All tested doses of EA-MMC per se did not produce
either climbing behavior or ataxia in this experiment when compared with the saline
control group. Similarly, pretreatment with EA-MMC (5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg, p.o.)
significantly (P<0.0001) reduced methamphetamine-induced stereotypy
behavior in a dose-dependent manner, as shown in Figs.
2a and 2b.
Fig. 1.
Effect of EA-MMC (5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg, p.o.) on cage climbing behavior and
climbing time induced by apomorphine in mice. Each point represents the mean ± SEM
from the scores obtained from six animals. (a) Cumulative climbing scores were
measured for 30 min at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min after apomorphine injection.
(b) Total climbing time on the wall of the cage. Levels of statistical significance
are depicted as follows: ##, P<0.01 and ###,
P<0.001 when compared with the saline control group; *,
P<0.05 when compared with the vehicle control group. When not
indicated, the differences were statistically insignificant.
Fig. 2.
Effect of EA-MMC (5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg, p.o.) on stereotypies induced by
methamphetamine in mice. (a) Each point represents the mean ± SEM from the
stereotypy scores. (b) The cumulative stereotypy scores were measured during 30 to
60 min after administration of methamphetamine. Levels of statistical significance
are depicted as follows: ###, P<0.001 when compared with the
saline control group; *, P<0.05 when compared with the vehicle
control group. When not indicated, the differences were statistically
insignificant.
Effect of EA-MMC (5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg, p.o.) on cage climbing behavior and
climbing time induced by apomorphine in mice. Each point represents the mean ± SEM
from the scores obtained from six animals. (a) Cumulative climbing scores were
measured for 30 min at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min after apomorphine injection.
(b) Total climbing time on the wall of the cage. Levels of statistical significance
are depicted as follows: ##, P<0.01 and ###,
P<0.001 when compared with the saline control group; *,
P<0.05 when compared with the vehicle control group. When not
indicated, the differences were statistically insignificant.Effect of EA-MMC (5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg, p.o.) on stereotypies induced by
methamphetamine in mice. (a) Each point represents the mean ± SEM from the
stereotypy scores. (b) The cumulative stereotypy scores were measured during 30 to
60 min after administration of methamphetamine. Levels of statistical significance
are depicted as follows: ###, P<0.001 when compared with the
saline control group; *, P<0.05 when compared with the vehicle
control group. When not indicated, the differences were statistically
insignificant.
Effect of EA-MMC on haloperidol-induced catalepsy in mice
Normal saline-treated control animals did not display catalepsy in the bar test, as they
remained on the bar less than 5 s. Intraperitoneal treatment of vehicle control animals
with haloperidol at 0.5 mg/kg induced a cataleptic state at 30 min after injection. EA-MMC
(500, 750, 1,000, and 3,000 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly reduced the duration of
haloperidol-induced catalepsy in a dose-dependent manner at 30 min [F (5, 42)=7.606;
P<0.0001] and 60 min [F (5, 42)=13.08;
P<0.0001], as shown in Fig. 3a and
3b. EA-MMC per se at all doses (5–3,000 mg/kg, p.o.) did not show any
cataleptic behavior or any marked behavioral alterations.
Fig. 3.
Effect of EA-MMC (500, 750, 1,000, and 3,000 mg/kg, p.o.) on haloperidol-induced
catalepsy in mice. (a) 30 min (b) 60 min after haloperidol treatment. Values are
expressed as the mean ± SEM. Levels of statistical significance are depicted as
follows: ###, P<0.001 when compared with the saline control
group; **, P<0.01 and ***, P<0.001 when
compared with the vehicle control group. When not indicated, the differences were
statistically insignificant.
Effect of EA-MMC (500, 750, 1,000, and 3,000 mg/kg, p.o.) on haloperidol-induced
catalepsy in mice. (a) 30 min (b) 60 min after haloperidol treatment. Values are
expressed as the mean ± SEM. Levels of statistical significance are depicted as
follows: ###, P<0.001 when compared with the saline control
group; **, P<0.01 and ***, P<0.001 when
compared with the vehicle control group. When not indicated, the differences were
statistically insignificant.
Discussion
The present findings revealed the neuromodulatory effect of EA-MMC on the dopaminergic
system in mice. Acute oral pretreatment with EA-MMC at relatively lower doses (<25 mg/kg,
p.o.) significantly decreased apomorphine-induced climbing behavior and climbing time in
mice. Apomorphine is a known nonselective dopamine agonist that causes changes in motor
behaviors through the central nervous system. Administration of apomorphine induces
locomotor activity, rearing/grooming [15],
stereotyped behaviors [1], and cage-climbing behaviors
[28] in rodents. Apomorphine-induced climbing
behavior is due to stimulation of postsynaptic mesolimbic D2 and D1
dopamine (DA) receptors and is an accepted animal model for studying postsynaptic DA
activity in the brain [6, 23]. It has been well-established that activation of both D1
and D2 receptors is needed to demonstrate climbing behavior in rodents [13]. Neither a pure D1 agonist, SKF38393, nor
pure D2 agonist, quinpirole, could induce this behavior. On the other hand,
either a selective D1 antagonist or a selective D2 antagonist
successfully alleviated apomorphine-induced climbing behavior [16]. Alleviation of apomorphine-induced climbing in the mouse is
indicative of inhibition of D1 and/or D2 receptors. In this context,
we earlier reported the antidopaminergic effect of a crude methanolic extract of unripe
M. citrifolia(MMC) fruit at gram doses (3–10 g/kg, p.o.) [21]. In the present study, the ethyl acetate fraction of
MMC (EA-MMC) showed an antidopaminergic effect at milligram doses (10–25 mg/kg, p.o.). The
potent antidopaminergic effect of EA-MMC, when compared with MMC, could be due to enrichment
of phytochemicals present in the EA-MMC fraction.Methamphetamine is a psychostimulant that facilitates the release of newly synthesized DA
and inhibits the uptake of DA, causing hyperactivity [14]. Acute administration of methamphetamine activates the nigrostriatal and
mesolimbic dopamine systems, leading to hyperlocomotion and stereotyped behavior such as
continuous sniffing, licking, biting (or gnawing), circling, and head bobbing in rodents
[5, 12, 25]. In the present study, acute pretreatment with EA-MMC
(5 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly reduced methamphetamine-induced stereotypy, suggesting
an antidopaminergic effect of EA-MMC at lower doses (<10 mg/kg). In our earlier study
[21], a crude extract of MMC showed an
antidopaminergic effect against methamphetamine-induced stereotypy at doses 1–10 g/kg, p.o.
Moreover, in our earlier acute oral toxicity study, MMC did not produce any toxic symptoms
or mortality up to a dose level of 20 g/kg body weight in mice [21]. According to OECD Test Guideline 423 for acute oral toxicity, a
maximal tolerable dose of 2 g/kg or above is categorized as unclassified and considered
safe.Interestingly, EA-MMC (5–100 mg/kg, p.o.) exhibited a dose-dependent U-shaped trend in the
APO-induced cage climbing and METH-induced stereotypy animal models (Figs. 1a and 2b). EA-MMC at
100 mg/kg was found to be ineffective in both animal models. In order to establish the
dopaminergic agonistic effect of EA-MMC at higher doses (500–3,000 mg/kg, p.o.), the bar
test was used to test the higher doses of EA-MMC against haloperidol-induced catalepsy in
mice. Haloperidol is a reputable neuroleptic that specifically acts as a dopamine
D2 receptor antagonist in the mesolimbic-mesocortical pathway. In view of its
nonselective action, haloperidol produces a blockade of postsynaptic D2 receptors
in the nigrostriatal pathway, generating extrapyramidal side effects in humans [9] and catalepsy in animals [24]. EA-MMC at higher doses (500–3,000 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly
decreased haloperidol-induced catalepsy in a dose-dependent manner. The maximum reduction of
catalepsy was observed at a dose of 3,000 mg/kg (p.o.) of EA-MMC. However, EA-MMC at 500
mg/kg could not alleviate haloperidol-induced catalepsy in mice. These results demonstrate
the ineffectiveness of EA-MMC (100–500 mg/kg) on the dopaminergic system; that is, it
exhibited neither antidopaminergic nor dopaminergic activities at these doses (100–500
mg/kg). This could be due to equal activity of EA-MMC at pre- and postsynaptic dopaminergic
receptors at the doses tested (100–500 mg/kg).It has been previously reported that haloperidol-induced catalepsy can be promisingly
reversed by D2 dopamine receptor agonists [19]. Therefore, it can be postulated that the anti-cataleptic effect of EA-MMC at
higher doses (500–3,000 mg/kg) could be mediated by its dopaminergic agonistic activity.
Thus, these results demonstrated the biphasic effect of EA-MMC on the dopaminergic system,
that is, antagonism of dopaminergic transmission at lower doses (<25 mg/kg), since this
extract decreased cage climbing behavior and stereotyped behavior induced by apomorphine and
methamphetamine respectively, and a dopaminergic agonistic effect at higher doses (>1,000
mg/kg). These results are consistent with our earlier ex vivo study report
that demonstrated the biphasic effect of MMC on the dopaminergic system, that is, the
antidopaminergic effect at lower doses (<40 mg/ml) and dopaminergic agonistic effect at
higher doses (>60 mg/ml) in isolated rat vas deferens preparations [22]. Biphasic effects of drugs on biological systems have been
extensively studied and reported earlier in the literature. In our recent report, acute
treatment with α-asarone elicited biphasic actions in the tail suspension test (TST), in
which an antidepressant-like effect was seen at relatively lower doses (15 and 20 mg/kg,
i.p.) and depressive-like activity was seen at relatively higher doses (50 and 100 mg/kg,
i.p.) [3]. Similarly, acute oral administration of a
methanolic extract of Mitragyna speciosa leaf (MMS; 50–500 mg/kg) showed an
inverted bell-shaped dose response in apomorphine-induced cage climbing behavior in mice
[27]. MMS at lower doses (75 and 100 mg/kg) was
found to be effective in attenuating apomorphine-induced climbing behavior in mice, whereas
at higher doses (>125 mg/kg), it was ineffective; therefore, only lower doses (75 and 100
mg/kg) were suggested for the antidopaminergic effect of MMS [27]. Furthermore, these findings coincide with the conjecture of Wang
et al. that noni acts as a Yin/Yang regulator from micro-Yin/Yang to
macro-Yin/Yang in improving two opposite health conditions such as diarrhea and constipation
[28].Dopamine receptors are broadly classified into D1 and D2 families
that regulate physiological actions of dopamine [2].
D1-family dopamine receptors (D1 and D5) activate the
Gαs/olf family of G proteins, thereby stimulating adenylate cyclase and
subsequently increasing the production of cAMP. The D1 dopamine receptor family
is primarily found postsynaptically on dopamine-receptive cells, such as GABAergic medium
spiny neurons (MSNs) in the striatum [2]. Activation
of postsynaptic D1 dopamine receptors leads to a moderate stimulatory effect on
locomotor activity [2]. Meanwhile, stimulation of
D2-family dopamine receptors (D2, D3, and D4)
coupled with the Gαi/o family of G proteins inhibits adenylate cyclase, thereby
decreasing cAMP production. The D2 and D3 dopamine receptors are
expressed on both pre- and postsynaptic dopaminergic neurons in contrast to the
D1 receptor family. D2 receptors, located presynaptically on
dopaminergic neurons, act as autoreceptors that provide important negative feedback
mechanisms such as inhibition of neuronal synthesis, release of the neurotransmitter, and
firing rate. Activation of presynaptic D2 autoreceptors leads to a decrease in
locomotor activity due to reduction in dopamine release, whereas activation of postsynaptic
D2 receptors stimulates locomotion [2].
Therefore, dopamine agonists can produce a biphasic effect at different concentrations. At
lower concentrations, a dopamine agonist activates the presynaptic D2
autoreceptors, thereby decreasing dopamine release and consequently impeding behavioral
activity. At higher concentrations, it activates the postsynaptic D2 receptors
and stimulates abnormal behavioural activity such as stereotypy [2]. Though the present study could not delineate the actual mechanism of
the facilitatory effect of EA-MMC on dopaminergic transmission at higher doses (>1,000
mg/kg), it might be possible that EA-MMC at higher doses blocks presynaptic dopaminergic
D2 autoreceptors, thereby potentiating the release of DA in the synaptic cleft.
It has been previously demonstrated that administration of EA-MMC to rats at a daily dose of
200 or 400 mg/kg for 15 days significantly increased the brain levels of monoamines
including dopamine [18].Contrary to the above, a reduction in the levels of neurotransmitters from various part of
the brain, including noradrenaline in the amygdala and the hippocampus, serotonin in the
amygdala, DOPAC in the hippocampus and substantia nigra, and HVA in the substantia nigra,
was found in noni-treated rats (1 ml/day, p.o., for 15 days), and it was hypothesized that
this contributes to the anxiolytic effects of noni [26]. The discrepancies in the levels of monoamines (NA, DA, and 5HT) following
noni treatment in different studies might be due to the differences in the doses of fruit
extract used in the studies. Increased levels of monoamines in animals treated with
chronically high doses of EA-MMC could be due to enrichment of active constituents in the
ethyl acetate fraction. Enriched active phytoconstituents of high doses of EA-MMC could
block presynaptic D2 receptors, thereby enhancing the level of monoamines
including dopamine. However, there might be other possibilities involved in the biphasic
effect of EA-MMC. A schema describing the probable pharmacological mechanisms thought to be
underlying in the biphasic effect of EA-MMC at higher and lower doses is illustrated in
Fig. 4. In general, the combination of active phytoconstituents present in medicinal herbs
is responsible for their therapeutic benefits. An HPLC analysis of the ethyl acetate
fractions obtained from a previous study showed the presence of rutin, scopoletin, and
quercetin [20]. Based on the information available in
the literature, it appears that there is some contribution of these bioactive compounds
(rutin, scopoletin, and quercetin) to noni’s neurological effects. Importantly, scopoletin
has been recommended as a marker constituent for quality control and pharmacokinetic study
of noni products [11]. Additionally, our earlier
report demonstrated the antidopaminergic effect of scopoletin and rutin per
se in an ex vivo study [22]. Although these phytoconstituents are present in many plants, it is felt that
their efficacy in producing an antidopaminergic effect is determined by the quantity of them
and their interaction with other phytoconstituents of the plant species. Therefore, these
bioactive principles in EA-MMC could mediate the neuromodulatory effect on the dopaminergic
system in mice. However, further receptor-ligand binding assays are warranted to ascertain
the actual mechanism involved in the biphasic effect of M. citrifolia fruit
on the dopaminergic system.
Fig. 4.
The proposed mechanisms of the biphasic effect of the ethyl acetate (EA-MMC) fraction
of the methanolic extract of noni (Morinda citrifolia Linn.) fruit on
the dopaminergic system.
The proposed mechanisms of the biphasic effect of the ethyl acetate (EA-MMC) fraction
of the methanolic extract of noni (Morinda citrifolia Linn.) fruit on
the dopaminergic system.In conclusion, acute oral treatment of EA-MMC showed a biphasic effect on the dopaminergic
system in in vivo animal models. EA-MMC attenuated the cage climbing and
stereotyped behavior induced by apomorphine and methamphetamine respectively, thereby
demonstrating the antidopaminergic activity of EA-MMC. At higher doses, however, EA-MMC
facilitated the dopaminergic system as demonstrated by reversal of haloperidol-induced
catalepsy in mice. This atypical biphasic effect of EA-MMC on the dopaminergic system could
be utilized for further research to identify the novel therapeutic potential of noni fruit
in dopaminergic pathway-mediated neuropsychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia,
Parkinson’s disease, drug addiction, and many others.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.