Literature DB >> 24910345

Innovative approaches to optimizing the delivery of vancomycin in individual patients.

Manjunath P Pai1, Michael Neely2, Keith A Rodvold3, Thomas P Lodise4.   

Abstract

The delivery of personalized antimicrobial therapy is a critical component in the treatment of patients with invasive infections. Vancomycin, the drug of choice for infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, requires the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for delivery of optimal therapy. Current guidance on vancomycin TDM includes the measurement of a trough concentration as a surrogate for achieving an AUC to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by broth microdilution (AUC/MICBMD) ratio≥400. Although trough-only monitoring has been widely integrated into clinical practice, there is a high degree of inter-individual variability between a measured trough concentration and the actual AUC value. The therapeutic discordance between AUC and trough may lead to suboptimal outcomes among patients with infections due to less susceptible pathogens or unnecessarily increase the probability of acute kidney injury (AKI) in others. Given the potentially narrow vancomycin AUC range for optimal effect and minimal AKI, clinicians need a "real-time" system to predict accurately the AUC with limited pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling. This article reviews two innovative approaches for calculating the vancomycin AUC in clinical practice based on one or two drug concentrations. One such approach involves the use of Bayesian computer software programs to estimate the "true" vancomycin AUC value with minimal PK sampling and provide AUC-guided dosing recommendations at the bedside. An alternative involves use of two concentrations (peak and trough) and simple analytic equations to estimate AUC values. Both approaches provide considerable improvements over the current trough-only concentration monitoring method.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC; Bayesian; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Trough; Vancomycin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24910345     DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev        ISSN: 0169-409X            Impact factor:   15.470


  55 in total

1.  Balancing vancomycin efficacy and nephrotoxicity: should we be aiming for trough or AUC/MIC?

Authors:  Karisma Patel; Ashley S Crumby; Holly D Maples
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Daptomycin Improves Outcomes Regardless of Vancomycin MIC in a Propensity-Matched Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Kimberly C Claeys; Evan J Zasowski; Anthony M Casapao; Abdalhamid M Lagnf; Jerod L Nagel; Cynthia T Nguyen; Jessica A Hallesy; Mathew T Compton; Keith S Kaye; Donald P Levine; Susan L Davis; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Should Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin Based on Area under the Curve Become Standard Practice for Patients with Confirmed or Suspected Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  Relationship between vancomycin exposure and outcomes among patients with MRSA bloodstream infections with vancomycin Etest® MIC values of 1.5mg/L: A pilot study.

Authors:  D M Martirosov; M R Bidell; M P Pai; M H Scheetz; S L Rosenkranz; T P Lodise
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Evaluation of Tobramycin Exposure Predictions in Three Bayesian Forecasting Programmes Compared with Current Clinical Practice in Children and Adults with Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Marc Burgard; Indy Sandaradura; Sebastiaan J van Hal; Sonya Stacey; Stefanie Hennig
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Prospective Trial on the Use of Trough Concentration versus Area under the Curve To Determine Therapeutic Vancomycin Dosing.

Authors:  Michael N Neely; Lauren Kato; Gilmer Youn; Lironn Kraler; David Bayard; Michael van Guilder; Alan Schumitzky; Walter Yamada; Brenda Jones; Emi Minejima
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Peak Measurement for Vancomycin AUC Estimation in Obese Adults Improves Precision and Lowers Bias.

Authors:  Manjunath P Pai; Joseph Hong; Lynne Krop
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Influence of renal function estimation on pharmacokinetic modeling of vancomycin in elderly patients.

Authors:  Anaïs Glatard; Laurent Bourguignon; Roger W Jelliffe; Pascal Maire; Michael N Neely; Sylvain Goutelle
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pilot Study of a Bayesian Approach To Estimate Vancomycin Exposure in Obese Patients with Limited Pharmacokinetic Sampling.

Authors:  Joseph J Carreno; Ben Lomaestro; John Tietjan; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Vancomycin Dosing and Pharmacokinetics in Postoperative Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery Patients.

Authors:  Emily C Benefield; Tracy M Hagemann; H Christine Allen; Kevin Farmer; Michael E Burton; Susana Chavez-Bueno; Peter N Johnson
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.