Literature DB >> 28446630

Texture-Based Differences in Eating Rate Reduce the Impact of Increased Energy Density and Large Portions on Meal Size in Adults.

Keri McCrickerd1, Charlotte Mh Lim1, Claudia Leong1, Edwin M Chia1, Ciaran G Forde2.   

Abstract

Background: Large portions and high dietary energy density promote overconsumption at meal times. This could be reduced by eating slowly.Objective: Two studies investigated whether texture-based reductions in eating rate and oral processing moderate consumption at breakfast in combination with variations in energy density and portion size.
Methods: Adults attended 4 breakfast sessions (2 × 2 repeated-measures design) to consume rice porridge, combining a 45% reduction in eating rate [thin porridge (140 g/min) compared with thick porridge (77 g/min)] with a 77% increase in energy density (0.57 compared with 1.01 kcal/g) in study 1 [n = 61; aged 21-48 y; body mass index (BMI; in kg/m2): 16-29] and a 50% increase in portion size (100% compared with 150%) in study 2 (n = 53; aged 21-42 y; BMI: 16-29). Oral processing behaviors were coded by using webcams. Porridge intake was measured alongside changes in rated appetite.
Results: Increases in energy density and portion size led to increases of 80% and 13% in energy intake at breakfast, respectively (P < 0.001), but only portion size increased the weight of food consumed (13%). The thicker porridges were consumed at a slower rate and led to 11-13% reductions in food weight and energy intake compared with the thin versions (P < 0.001). Combined, the least energy was consumed when the thick "slow" porridge was served with a lower energy density or smaller portion (P < 0.05). Although intake was reduced for the thick porridges, they were expected to be more filling than the thin versions and experienced as equally satiating postconsumption.Conclusions: Adults eat in response to external features of the food environment. An opportunity exists to use a combination of energy-density dilution, smaller portions, and natural variations in food texture to design meals that promote reductions in energy intake while maintaining satiety.
© 2017 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eating behaviors; eating rate; energy density; food texture; meal size; obesogenic environment; portion size

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28446630     DOI: 10.3945/jn.116.244251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  26 in total

Review 1.  Potential moderators of the portion size effect.

Authors:  Faris M Zuraikat; Alissa D Smethers; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-03-01

2.  Ultra-Processed Diets Cause Excess Calorie Intake and Weight Gain: An Inpatient Randomized Controlled Trial of Ad Libitum Food Intake.

Authors:  Kevin D Hall; Alexis Ayuketah; Robert Brychta; Hongyi Cai; Thomas Cassimatis; Kong Y Chen; Stephanie T Chung; Elise Costa; Amber Courville; Valerie Darcey; Laura A Fletcher; Ciaran G Forde; Ahmed M Gharib; Juen Guo; Rebecca Howard; Paule V Joseph; Suzanne McGehee; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Klaudia Raisinger; Irene Rozga; Michael Stagliano; Mary Walter; Peter J Walter; Shanna Yang; Megan Zhou
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 27.287

3.  Increased oral processing and a slower eating rate increase glycaemic, insulin and satiety responses to a mixed meal tolerance test.

Authors:  Ai Ting Goh; Jie Ying Michelle Choy; Xin Hui Chua; Shalini Ponnalagu; Chin Meng Khoo; Clare Whitton; Rob Martinus van Dam; Ciarán Gerard Forde
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  Oral processing behaviours that promote children's energy intake are associated with parent-reported appetitive traits: Results from the GUSTO cohort.

Authors:  Anna Fogel; Lisa R Fries; Keri McCrickerd; Ai Ting Goh; Phaik Ling Quah; Mei Jun Chan; Jia Ying Toh; Yap-Seng Chong; Kok Hian Tan; Fabian Yap; Lynette P Shek; Michael J Meaney; Birit F P Broekman; Yung Seng Lee; Keith M Godfrey; Mary Foong Fong Chong; Ciarán G Forde
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  A comparison of bite size and BMI in a cafeteria setting.

Authors:  Ryan S Mattfeld; Eric R Muth; Adam Hoover
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-09-08

6.  Eating behaviors moderate the associations between risk factors in the first 1000 days and adiposity outcomes at 6 years of age.

Authors:  Anna Fogel; Keri McCrickerd; Izzuddin M Aris; Ai Ting Goh; Yap-Seng Chong; Kok Hian Tan; Fabian Yap; Lynette P Shek; Michael J Meaney; Birit F P Broekman; Keith M Godfrey; Mary F F Chong; Shirong Cai; Wei Wei Pang; Wen Lun Yuan; Yung Seng Lee; Ciarán G Forde
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Texture-based differences in eating rate influence energy intake for minimally processed and ultra-processed meals.

Authors:  Pey Sze Teo; Amanda JiaYing Lim; Ai Ting Goh; Janani R; Jie Ying Michelle Choy; Keri McCrickerd; Ciarán G Forde
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 8.472

8.  Consistency of Eating Rate, Oral Processing Behaviours and Energy Intake across Meals.

Authors:  Keri McCrickerd; Ciaran G Forde
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  The Availability of Slow and Fast Calories in the Dutch Diet: The Current Situation and Opportunities for Interventions.

Authors:  Janet van den Boer; Melanie Werts; Els Siebelink; Cees de Graaf; Monica Mars
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2017-10-02

10.  Effects of Consuming Preloads with Different Energy Density and Taste Quality on Energy Intake and Postprandial Blood Glucose.

Authors:  Siew Ling Tey; Nurhazwani Salleh; Christiani Jeyakumar Henry; Ciaran G Forde
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.