| Literature DB >> 28446004 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neuroinflammation is involved in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders. Conditioned medium (CM) derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) revealed substantial benefits due to its rich content of trophic factors. Salidroside (Sal), extracted from Rhodiola rosea, is known for its anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. This study was designed to investigate the effect of Sal pretreated CM (CM-Sal) derived from bone marrow MSCs in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced neuroinflammation.Entities:
Keywords: Conditioned medium; Mesenchymal stem cells; Neuroinflammation; Salidroside
Year: 2017 PMID: 28446004 PMCID: PMC5488777 DOI: 10.15283/ijsc16055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Stem Cells ISSN: 2005-3606 Impact factor: 2.500
Fig. 1Photomicrograph of mice frontal cortex (A) Group I (normal control) showing normal cerebral architecture with multiple neurons exhibiting large pale vesicular nuclei (arrow) among glial cells that could be identified by their small dark nuclei (arrow head). (B) Group II (LPS) and (C) Group III (LPS-DMEM) revealing multiple deformed neurons with dark shrunken nuclei (arrow) together with small acidophilic masses (arrow head) with marginated nuclei and multiple empty spaces (S) (D) Group IV (LPS-CM) and (E) Group V (LPS-CM-Sal) demonstrating preserved cerebral architecture with apparently less dark nuclei and very few acidophilic masses (arrow head) (H&E, ×200).
Fig. 2Photomicrograph of mice frontal cortex (A) Group I (normal control) showing scanty positive caspase 3 cytoplasmic staining (arrow head) in very few cells. (B) Group II (LPS) and (C) Group III (LPS-DMEM) revealing more positive caspase 3 cytoplasmic staining (arrow head). (D) Group IV (LPS-CM) and (E) Group V (LPS-CM-Sal) demonstrating apparent decrease of caspase 3 immunoreaction (arrow head) (Caspase 3 immunohistochemistry, ×200).
Fig. 3Photomicrograph of mice frontal cortex (A) Group I (normal control) showing typical positive GFAP cytoplasmic staining of astrocytes (arrow head) that demonstrate multiple branched cytoplasmic processes. (B) Group II (LPS) and (C) Group III (LPS-DMEM) revealing obvious increase in GFAP immunoreaction of astrocytes (arrow head). (D) Group IV (LPS-CM) and (E) Group V (LPS-CM-Sal) demonstrating apparent less GFAP immunoreaction of astrocytes (arrow head). (GFAP immunohistochemistry, ×200).
Fig. 4Photomicrograph of mice frontal cortex (A) Group I (normal control) showing very few CD68 positive microglia (arrow head) (A). (B) Group II (LPS) and (C) Group III (LPS-DMEM) revealing more CD68 positive microglia (arrow head) that exhibited rounded or oval shape. (D) Group IV (LPS-CM) and (E) Group V (LPS-CM-Sal) demonstrating apparent decrease in CD68 positive microglia (arrow head). (CD68 immunohistochemistry, ×400).
Mean area percent±SD of caspase3, GFAP and CD68 immuno-expression in control and experimental groups
| Caspase3 | GFAP | CD68 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Normal control) | 0.73±0.18 | 24.41±0.62 | 2.47±0.31 |
| Group II (LPS) | 11.19±0.31 | 41.90±0.80 | 16.09±0.78 |
| Group III (LPS-DMEM) | 11.17±0.45 | 42.25±0.99 | 16.09±0.18 |
| Group IV (LPS-CM) | 6.73±0.39 | 35.33±0.83 | 9.15±0.41 |
| Group V (LPS-CM-Sal) | 4.08±0.62 | 30.29±0.46 | 5.26±0.33 |
p<0.05: significant as compared to Group I.
p<0.05: significant as compared to Group II.
p<0.05: significant as compared to Group III.
p<0.05: significant as compared to Group IV.