Literature DB >> 28445544

Pressure flaking to serrate bifacial points for the hunt during the MIS5 at Sibudu Cave (South Africa).

Veerle Rots1, Carol Lentfer2, Viola C Schmid3,4, Guillaume Porraz5,6, Nicholas J Conard3,7.   

Abstract

Projectile technology is considered to appear early in the southern African Middle Stone Age (MSA) and the rich and high resolution MSA sequence of Sibudu Cave in KwaZulu-Natal has provided many new insights about the use and hafting of various projectile forms. We present the results of a functional and technological analysis on a series of unpublished serrated bifacial points recently recovered from the basal deposits of Sibudu Cave. These serrated tools, which only find equivalents in the neighbouring site of Umhlatuzana, precede the Still Bay techno-complex and are older than 77 ka BP. Independent residue and use-wear analyses were performed in a phased procedure involving two separate analysts, which allowed the engagement between two separate lines of functional evidence. Thanks to the excellent preservation at Sibudu Cave, a wide range of animal, plant and mineral residues were observed in direct relation with diagnostic wear patterns. The combination of technological, wear and residue evidence allowed us to confirm that the serration was manufactured with bone compressors and that the serrated points were mounted with a composite adhesive as the tips of projectiles used in hunting activities. The suite of technological and functional data pushes back the evidence for the use of pressure flaking during the MSA and highlights the diversity of the technical innovations adopted by southern African MSA populations. We suggest the serrated points from the stratigraphic units Adam to Darya of Sibudu illustrate one important technological adaptation of the southern African MSA and provide another example of the variability of MSA bifacial technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28445544      PMCID: PMC5405927          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  22 in total

1.  Emergence of modern human behavior: Middle Stone Age engravings from South Africa.

Authors:  Christopher S Henshilwood; Francesco d'Errico; Royden Yates; Zenobia Jacobs; Chantal Tribolo; Geoff A T Duller; Norbert Mercier; Judith C Sealy; Helene Valladas; Ian Watts; Ann G Wintle
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Preparing ballistic gelatine--review and proposal for a standard method.

Authors:  Jorma Jussila
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2004-05-10       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Early use of pressure flaking on lithic artifacts at Blombos Cave, South Africa.

Authors:  Vincent Mourre; Paola Villa; Christopher S Henshilwood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Putting ochre to the test: replication studies of adhesives that may have been used for hafting tools in the Middle Stone Age.

Authors:  Lyn Wadley
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 3.895

5.  Engraved ochres from the Middle Stone Age levels at Blombos Cave, South Africa.

Authors:  Christopher S Henshilwood; Francesco d'Errico; Ian Watts
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 3.895

6.  Lithic technology and behavioural modernity: new results from the Still Bay site, Hollow Rock Shelter, Western Cape Province, South Africa.

Authors:  Anders Högberg; Lars Larsson
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.895

7.  Border Cave revisited: a revised ESR chronology.

Authors:  R Grün; P Beaumont
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.895

8.  What is Still Bay? Human biogeography and bifacial point variability.

Authors:  Will Archer; Cornel M Pop; Philipp Gunz; Shannon P McPherron
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.895

9.  The Still Bay and Howiesons Poort at Sibudu and Blombos: Understanding Middle Stone Age Technologies.

Authors:  Sylvain Soriano; Paola Villa; Anne Delagnes; Ilaria Degano; Luca Pollarolo; Jeannette J Lucejko; Christopher Henshilwood; Lyn Wadley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Lap Shear and Impact Testing of Ochre and Beeswax in Experimental Middle Stone Age Compound Adhesives.

Authors:  P R B Kozowyk; G H J Langejans; J A Poulis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Middle Stone Age Bifacial Technology and Pressure Flaking at the MIS 3 Site of Toumboura III, Eastern Senegal.

Authors:  Viola C Schmid; Katja Douze; Chantal Tribolo; Maria Lorenzo Martinez; Michel Rasse; Laurent Lespez; Brice Lebrun; David Hérisson; Matar Ndiaye; Eric Huysecom
Journal:  Afr Archaeol Rev       Date:  2021-11-25

2.  Assessment of complex projectiles in the early Late Pleistocene at Aduma, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yonatan Sahle; Alison S Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Technological and functional analysis of 80-60 ka bone wedges from Sibudu (KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa).

Authors:  Francesco d'Errico; Luc Doyon; Lucinda R Backwell; Lyn Wadley; Lila Geis; Alain Queffelec; William E Banks
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  The MIS5 Pietersburg at '28' Bushman Rock Shelter, Limpopo Province, South Africa.

Authors:  Guillaume Porraz; Aurore Val; Chantal Tribolo; Norbert Mercier; Paloma de la Peña; Magnus M Haaland; Marina Igreja; Christopher E Miller; Viola C Schmid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Bone retouchers and technological continuity in the Middle Stone Age of North Africa.

Authors:  Elaine Turner; Louise Humphrey; Abdeljalil Bouzouggar; Nick Barton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Split-based points from the Swabian Jura highlight Aurignacian regional signatures.

Authors:  Keiko Kitagawa; Nicholas J Conard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.