Literature DB >> 27457545

What is Still Bay? Human biogeography and bifacial point variability.

Will Archer1, Cornel M Pop2, Philipp Gunz2, Shannon P McPherron2.   

Abstract

'Still Bay' is the name given to a cultural phase within the southern African Middle Stone Age, which remains critical to our understanding of modern human behavioural evolution. Although represented in only a handful of sites, the Still Bay is widespread geographically and, at certain localities, persisted over a substantial period of time. Many studies have focused on tracing the temporal range and geographic reach of the Still Bay, as well as inferring degrees of early modern human demographic connectedness from these parameters. Variation within the Still Bay, relative to the accuracy with which it can be identified, has received considerably less attention. However, demographic models based on the spread of the Still Bay in space and time hinge on the reliability with which it can be recognized in the archaeological record. Here we document patterns of bifacial point shape and size variation in some key Still Bay assemblages, and analyse these patterns using the statistical shape analysis tools of geometric morphometrics. Morphological variation appears to be geographically structured and is driven by the spatial separation between north-eastern and south-western clusters of sites. We argue that allometric variation is labile and reflects environmentally driven differences in point reduction, whereas shape differences unrelated to size more closely reflect technological and cultural fragmentation. Our results suggest that the biogeographic structure of Middle Stone Age populations was complex during the period associated with the Still Bay, and provide little support for heightened levels of cultural interconnectedness between distantly separated groups at this time. We briefly discuss the implications of our findings for tracing classic techno-traditions in the Middle Stone Age record of southern Africa, and for inferring underpinning population dynamics from these patterns.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bifacial points; Cultural connectedness and fragmentation; Geographic variation; Geometric morphometrics; Modern human demography; Techno-traditions

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27457545     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2016.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  6 in total

1.  Identifying early modern human ecological niche expansions and associated cultural dynamics in the South African Middle Stone Age.

Authors:  Francesco d'Errico; William E Banks; Dan L Warren; Giovanni Sgubin; Karen van Niekerk; Christopher Henshilwood; Anne-Laure Daniau; María Fernanda Sánchez Goñi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Elliptical Fourier analysis: fundamentals, applications, and value for forensic anthropology.

Authors:  Jodi Caple; John Byrd; Carl N Stephan
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Pressure flaking to serrate bifacial points for the hunt during the MIS5 at Sibudu Cave (South Africa).

Authors:  Veerle Rots; Carol Lentfer; Viola C Schmid; Guillaume Porraz; Nicholas J Conard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  High handaxe symmetry at the beginning of the European Acheulian: The data from la Noira (France) in context.

Authors:  Radu Iovita; Inbal Tuvi-Arad; Marie-Hélène Moncel; Jackie Despriée; Pierre Voinchet; Jean-Jacques Bahain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Still Bay Point-Production Strategies at Hollow Rock Shelter and Umhlatuzana Rock Shelter and Knowledge-Transfer Systems in Southern Africa at about 80-70 Thousand Years Ago.

Authors:  Anders Högberg; Marlize Lombard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The MIS5 Pietersburg at '28' Bushman Rock Shelter, Limpopo Province, South Africa.

Authors:  Guillaume Porraz; Aurore Val; Chantal Tribolo; Norbert Mercier; Paloma de la Peña; Magnus M Haaland; Marina Igreja; Christopher E Miller; Viola C Schmid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.