| Literature DB >> 28444313 |
Chunjia Li1, Phillip Jackson2, Xin Lu1, Chaohua Xu1, Qing Cai3, Jayapathi Basnayake4, Prakash Lakshmanan5, Oula Ghannoum6, Yuanhong Fan1.
Abstract
Sugarcane, derived from the hybridization of Saccharum officinarum×Saccharum spontaneum, is a vegetative crop in which the final yield is highly driven by culm biomass production. Cane yield under irrigated or rain-fed conditions could be improved by developing genotypes with leaves that have high intrinsic transpiration efficiency, TEi (CO2 assimilation/stomatal conductance), provided this is not offset by negative impacts from reduced conductance and growth rates. This study was conducted to partition genotypic variation in TEi among a sample of diverse clones from the Chinese collection of sugarcane-related germplasm into that due to variation in stomatal conductance versus that due to variation in photosynthetic capacity. A secondary goal was to define protocols for optimized larger-scale screening of germplasm collections. Genotypic variation in TEi was attributed to significant variation in both stomatal and photosynthetic components. A number of genotypes were found to possess high TEi as a result of high photosynthetic capacity. This trait combination is expected to be of significant breeding value. It was determined that a small number of observations (16) is sufficient for efficiently screening TEi in larger populations of sugarcane genotypes The research methodology and results reported are encouraging in supporting a larger-scale screening and introgression of high transpiration efficiency in sugarcane breeding. However, further research is required to quantify narrow sense heritability as well as the leaf-to-field translational potential of genotypic variation in transpiration efficiency-related traits observed in this study.Entities:
Keywords: Breeding; genotypic variation; photosynthesis; sugarcane; transpiration efficiency.
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28444313 PMCID: PMC5447891 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Summary of leaf gas exchange characteristics for 20 sugarcane-related clones measured in the germplasm screening experiment
| Clone | Species |
| gs | Ci | TEi ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51NG63 |
| 23.1 | 0.169 | 122 | 142 |
| Guangxi87-20 |
| 20.2 | 0.146 | 128 | 141 |
| Hainanlingshui4 |
| 20.8 | 0.154 | 132 | 138 |
| India2 |
| 24.9 | 0.185 | 124 | 139 |
| Yunnan2009-2 |
| 23.3 | 0.183 | 137 | 132 |
| Uba |
| 13.9 | 0.095 | 123 | 150 |
| 96NG16 |
| 23.9 | 0.176 | 124 | 140 |
| Pansahi |
| 16.8 | 0.13 | 143 | 135 |
| Guangdong64# |
| 17.6 | 0.127 | 129 | 143 |
| Yunnan95-35# |
| 10 | 0.076 | 156 | 133 |
| Guangxi79-8# |
| 10.3 | 0.07 | 129 | 150 |
| Guangdong2010-102# |
| 12.6 | 0.09 | 133 | 145 |
| Yunnan95-20# |
| 15.8 | 0.112 | 121 | 149 |
| Yunnan97-4# |
| 12 | 0.093 | 159 | 129 |
| Hainan92-84# |
| 14.1 | 0.088 | 102 | 164 |
| KQ01-1390 | Commercial cultivara | 17.9 | 0.131 | 134 | 139 |
| Q208 | Commercial cultivara | 16.8 | 0.13 | 146 | 133 |
| ROC22 | Commercial cultivarb | 20.4 | 0.157 | 142 | 132 |
| Yuetang93-159 | Commercial cultivarb | 16.8 | 0.126 | 136 | 139 |
| Yunzhe03-194 | Commercial cultivarb | 22.3 | 0.174 | 132 | 136 |
| Mean | 17.4 | 0.128 | 133 | 141 | |
| Least significant difference ( | 2.1 | 0.018 | 12.3 | 7.7 | |
The clones were grown outdoors in pots or in the field. Plants were well watered and fertilized. Leaf gas exchange measurements were made at a photosynthetically active radiation of 1200 μmol m−2 s−1, CO2 of 400 µl L−1, and under ambient temperature and humidity. Values are the means of four replicates per clone measured over 20 days. The averages of each parameter across all measurements are shown. Commercial cultivars in aAustralia and bChina refer to a complex derivative of Saccharum officinarum×Saccharum spontaneum. #Transplanted from rhizomes instead of stem cuttings.
Fig. 1.Weather conditions during the experimental period. (A) Daily average temperature and (B) humidity, and (C) maximum (on an hourly basis) solar radiation during the experimental period. Plants were transplanted on 21 December 2013 and measured between 28 March 2014 and 12 September 2014. Days of measurement are indicated with tick marks on the top border of panel C.
Fig. 2.Predicted effect of number of observations on Hb and least significant difference.
Summary statistics from analysis of variance, and estimates of Hb on the basis of all data or a single measurement
| Statistic |
| gs | Ci | TEi ( | TEgs | TEpc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCV (%) | 25.3 | 27.4 | 8.6 | 5.3 | 4.0 | 2.9 |
| σclones2 | 19.1*** | 0.00122*** | 132*** | 55.8*** | 32.1*** | 16.9*** |
| σclone × dates2 | 4.81** | 0.00029** | 5.1 ns | 7.9 ns | 4.92** | 0.52 ns |
| σerror2 | 36.3 | 0.00278 | 1198 | 470 | 63.0 | 183.1 |
| Hb (all data basis) | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.91 |
| Hb (single measure basis) | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.14 |
ns = not significant; **P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001. Analysis was carried out as described in the “Materials and methods”.
Predicted gain in TEi from selection of the top 10 clones
| Number of measurements per clone | Number of clones able to be screened | Gain in TEi from selecting the top ranked 10 clones for TEi (μmol mol−1) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3000 | 7.4 |
| 2 | 1500 | 9.2 |
| 4 | 750 | 11.1 |
| 8 | 375 | 12.1 |
| 16 | 188 | 12.3 |
| 32 | 94 | 11.7 |
| 64 | 47 | 9.2 |
Predictions are for different combinations of measurements per genotypes × number of genotypes, and assuming a fixed number of 3000 measurements are made.
Correlations among leaf gas exchange parameters
|
| gs | TEi | Ci | TEgs | TEpc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.00 | |||||
| gs | 0.94 | 1.00 | ||||
| TEi | −0.13 | −0.41 | 1.00 | |||
| Ci | −0.18 | 0.12 | −0.95 | 1.00 | ||
| TEgs | −0.63 | −0.73 | 0.40 | −0.19 | 1.00 | |
| TEpc | 0.23 | −0.02 | 0.85 | −0.92 | −0.14 | 1.00 |
Pearson’s correlation coefficients for each measurement are shown based on all data collected. All correlations are statistically significant (P < 0.001, n = 1325).
Fig. 3.Relationship between leaf gas exchange parameters. (A) The relationship between A and gs and (B) the relationship between TEi and Ci, for all data collected. The solid line is a best fit exponential equation for all data points.
Fig. 4.Relationship between components of TEi. (A) Changes in TEpc and TEgs for each genotype expressed relative to the average of all genotypes. (B) Relationship between genotype performance for TEpc and TEgs.