Literature DB >> 21339387

Independent variation in photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance leads to differences in intrinsic water use efficiency in 11 soybean genotypes before and during mild drought.

Matthew E Gilbert1, Maciej A Zwieniecki, N Michele Holbrook.   

Abstract

Intrinsic water use efficiency (WUE(intr)), the ratio of photosynthesis to stomatal conductance to water, is often used as an index for crop water use in breeding projects. However, WUE(intr) conflates variation in these two processes, and thus may be less useful as a selection trait than knowledge of both components. The goal of the present study was to determine whether the contribution of photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance to WUE(intr) varied independently between soybean genotypes and whether this pattern was interactive with mild drought. Photosynthetic capacity was defined as the variation in WUE(intr) that would occur if genotypes of interest had the same stomatal conductance as a reference genotype and only differed in photosynthesis; similarly, the contribution of stomatal conductance to WUE(intr) was calculated assuming a constant photosynthetic capacity across genotypes. Genotypic differences in stomatal conductance had the greatest effect on WUE(intr) (26% variation when well watered), and was uncorrelated with the effect of photosynthetic capacity on WUE(intr). Thus, photosynthetic advantages of 8.3% were maintained under drought. The maximal rate of Rubisco carboxylation, generally the limiting photosynthetic process for soybeans, was correlated with photosynthetic capacity. As this trait was not interactive with leaf temperature, and photosynthetic capacity differences were maintained under mild drought, the observed patterns of photosynthetic advantage for particular genotypes are likely to be consistent across a range of environmental conditions. This suggests that it is possible to employ a selection strategy of breeding water-saving soybeans with high photosynthetic capacities to compensate for otherwise reduced photosynthesis in genotypes with lower stomatal conductance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21339387     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erq461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  28 in total

1.  Genome-wide association study (GWAS) of carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) in diverse soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes.

Authors:  Arun Prabhu Dhanapal; Jeffery D Ray; Shardendu K Singh; Valerio Hoyos-Villegas; James R Smith; Larry C Purcell; C Andy King; Perry B Cregan; Qijian Song; Felix B Fritschi
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Genotypic variability in physiological, biomass and yield response to drought stress in pigeonpea.

Authors:  M Vanaja; M Maheswari; P Sathish; P Vagheera; N Jyothi Lakshmi; G Vijay Kumar; S K Yadav; Abdul Razzaq; Jainender Singh; B Sarkar
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2015-10-15

3.  Do Endophytes Promote Growth of Host Plants Under Stress? A Meta-Analysis on Plant Stress Mitigation by Endophytes.

Authors:  Hyungmin Rho; Marian Hsieh; Shyam L Kandel; Johanna Cantillo; Sharon L Doty; Soo-Hyung Kim
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Variation in MPK12 affects water use efficiency in Arabidopsis and reveals a pleiotropic link between guard cell size and ABA response.

Authors:  David L Des Marais; Lisa C Auchincloss; Emeline Sukamtoh; John K McKay; Tierney Logan; James H Richards; Thomas E Juenger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Soybean tolerance to drought depends on the associated Bradyrhizobium strain.

Authors:  Paula Cerezini; Biana Harumi Kuwano; Anna Karolina Grunvald; Mariangela Hungria; Marco Antonio Nogueira
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.476

6.  Differential sensitivity of spinach and amaranthus to enhanced UV-B at varying soil nutrient levels: association with gas exchange, UV-B-absorbing compounds and membrane damage.

Authors:  Suruchi Singh; Madhoolika Agrawal; S B Agrawal
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Mapping a region within the 1RS.1BL translocation in common wheat affecting grain yield and canopy water status.

Authors:  Tyson Howell; Iago Hale; Ljupcho Jankuloski; Marcos Bonafede; Matthew Gilbert; Jorge Dubcovsky
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 8.  Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement.

Authors:  Joshua N Cobb; Genevieve Declerck; Anthony Greenberg; Randy Clark; Susan McCouch
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  The physiological response of Populus tremula x alba leaves to the down-regulation of PIP1 aquaporin gene expression under no water stress.

Authors:  Francesca Secchi; Maciej A Zwieniecki
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Natural variation in photosynthetic capacity, growth, and yield in 64 field-grown wheat genotypes.

Authors:  S M Driever; T Lawson; P J Andralojc; C A Raines; M A J Parry
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.