Literature DB >> 28442384

Optimal Settings for the Noncontact Holmium:YAG Stone Fragmentation Popcorn Technique.

Esteban Emiliani1, Michele Talso2, Sung-Yong Cho3, Mohammed Baghdadi2, Sadam Mahmoud2, Hugo Pinheiro2, Olivier Traxer4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the popcorn technique using a wide range of holmium laser settings and fiber sizes in a systematic in vitro assessment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evaluations were done with 4 artificial stones in a collection tube. A fixed ureteroscope was inserted through a ureteral access sheath to provide constant irrigation flow and the laser was placed 1 mm from the bottom. Combinations of 0.5 to 1.5 J, 10 to 20 and 40 Hz, and long and short pulses were tested for 2 and 4 minutes. We used 273 and 365 μm laser fibers. All tests were repeated 3 times. The stones were weighed before and after the experiments to evaluate the setting efficiency. Significant predictors of a highly efficient technique were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 144 tests were performed. Mean starting weight of the stones was 0.23 gm, which was consistent among the groups. After the experiment the median weight difference was 0.07 gm (range 0.01 to 0.24). When designating a 50% reduction in stone volume as the threshold indicating high efficiency, the significant predictors of an efficient popcorn technique were a long pulse (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.05-7.15), a longer duration (OR 11.4, 95% CI 3.88-33.29), a small (273 μm) laser fiber (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.70) and higher power (W) (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.20).
CONCLUSIONS: Higher energy, a longer pulse, frequencies higher than 10 Hz, a longer duration and a smaller laser fiber predict a popcorn technique that is more efficient at reducing stone volume.
Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ablation techniques; in vitro techniques; kidney calculi; lasers; solid state; ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28442384     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.3371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

1.  Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in non-contact mode: optimization of fiber to stone working distance to improve ablation efficiency.

Authors:  Vincent De Coninck; Etienne Xavier Keller; Paul Chiron; Laurian Dragos; Esteban Emiliani; Steeve Doizi; Laurent Berthe; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter Alken
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Flexible ureteroscopy: technique, tips and tricks.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Basic and advanced technological evolution of laser lithotripsy over the past decade: An educational review by the European Society of Urotechnology Section of the European Association of Urology.

Authors:  Lazaros Tzelves; Bhaskar Somani; Marinos Berdempes; Titos Markopoulos; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-05

5.  A simulated model for fluid and tissue heating during pediatric laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jonathan S Ellison; Brian MacConaghy; Timothy L Hall; William W Roberts; Adam D Maxwell
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.830

6.  Consultation on kidney stones, Copenhagen 2019: aspects of intracorporeal lithotripsy in flexible ureterorenoscopy.

Authors:  Søren Kissow Lildal; Kim Hovgaard Andreassen; Joyce Baard; Marianne Brehmer; Matthew Bultitude; Ylva Eriksson; Khurshid R Ghani; Helene Jung; Guido Kamphuis; Peter Kronenberg; Ben Turney; Olivier Traxer; Øyvind Ulvik; Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Which is the best way to treat a stone on a flexible ureterorrenoscopy? | Opinion: Fragmentation.

Authors:  Alex Meller
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 8.  Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in the New Stone Age: Dust or Bust?

Authors:  Ali H Aldoukhi; William W Roberts; Timothy L Hall; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-09-29

9.  Towards automatic recognition of pure and mixed stones using intra-operative endoscopic digital images.

Authors:  Vincent Estrade; Michel Daudon; Emmanuel Richard; Jean-Christophe Bernhard; Franck Bladou; Grégoire Robert; Baudouin Denis de Senneville
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.969

Review 10.  Advances in Lasers for the Treatment of Stones-a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.