Shunsuke Koga1, Maiko Ono2,3, Naruhiko Sahara2, Makoto Higuchi2, Dennis W Dickson1. 1. Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA. 2. National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan. 3. Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Molecular Neuroimaging, Sendai, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The tau PET ligand 2-((1E,3E)-4-(6-([11 C]methylamino)pyridin-3-yl)buta-1,3-dienyl)benzo[d]thiazol-6-ol ([11 C]PBB3) binds to a wide range of tau pathology; however, binding property of PBB3 to non-tau inclusions remains unknown. To clarify whether [11 C]PBB3 binds to α-synuclein pathology, reactivity of PBB3 was assessed by in vitro fluorescence and autoradiographic labeling of brain sections from α-synucleinopathies patients. METHOD: Of 10 pure Lewy body disease and 120 multiple system atrophy (MSA) cases in the Mayo Clinic brain bank, we selected 3 Lewy body disease and 4 MSA cases with a range of α-synuclein severity based on the quantitative analysis of α-synuclein burden. PBB3 fluorescence labeling, double or single immunostaining for α-synuclein and phospho-tau, Prussian blue staining, and in vitro autoradiography with [11 C]PBB3 were performed for these selected samples. RESULTS: PBB3 fluorescence labeled various α-synuclein lesions including Lewy bodies, Lewy neurites, spheroids, glial cytoplasmic inclusions, and neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions. Meanwhile, autoradiographic labeling with [11 C]PBB3 at 10 nM demonstrated no significant binding in Lewy body disease cases. In contrast, significant autoradiographic binding of [11 C]PBB3 to the striatopallidal fibers was found in 2 MSA cases, which had high densities of glial cytoplasmic inclusions without tau or iron deposits in this region. CONCLUSIONS: Given that the maximum concentration of [11 C]PBB3 in human PET scans is approximately 10 nM, the present data imply that α-synuclein pathology in Lewy body disease is undetectable by [11 C]PBB3-PET, whereas those in a subset of MSA cases with high densities of glial cytoplasmic inclusions could be captured by this radioligand.
BACKGROUND: The tau PET ligand 2-((1E,3E)-4-(6-([11 C]methylamino)pyridin-3-yl)buta-1,3-dienyl)benzo[d]thiazol-6-ol ([11 C]PBB3) binds to a wide range of tau pathology; however, binding property of PBB3 to non-tau inclusions remains unknown. To clarify whether [11 C]PBB3 binds to α-synuclein pathology, reactivity of PBB3 was assessed by in vitro fluorescence and autoradiographic labeling of brain sections from α-synucleinopathiespatients. METHOD: Of 10 pure Lewy body disease and 120 multiple system atrophy (MSA) cases in the Mayo Clinic brain bank, we selected 3 Lewy body disease and 4 MSA cases with a range of α-synuclein severity based on the quantitative analysis of α-synuclein burden. PBB3 fluorescence labeling, double or single immunostaining for α-synuclein and phospho-tau, Prussian blue staining, and in vitro autoradiography with [11 C]PBB3 were performed for these selected samples. RESULTS:PBB3 fluorescence labeled various α-synuclein lesions including Lewy bodies, Lewy neurites, spheroids, glial cytoplasmic inclusions, and neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions. Meanwhile, autoradiographic labeling with [11 C]PBB3 at 10 nM demonstrated no significant binding in Lewy body disease cases. In contrast, significant autoradiographic binding of [11 C]PBB3 to the striatopallidal fibers was found in 2 MSA cases, which had high densities of glial cytoplasmic inclusions without tau or iron deposits in this region. CONCLUSIONS: Given that the maximum concentration of [11 C]PBB3 in human PET scans is approximately 10 nM, the present data imply that α-synuclein pathology in Lewy body disease is undetectable by [11 C]PBB3-PET, whereas those in a subset of MSA cases with high densities of glial cytoplasmic inclusions could be captured by this radioligand.
Authors: Victor L Villemagne; Kerryn E Pike; Gaël Chételat; Kathryn A Ellis; Rachel S Mulligan; Pierrick Bourgeat; Uwe Ackermann; Gareth Jones; Cassandra Szoeke; Olivier Salvado; Ralph Martins; Graeme O'Keefe; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk; David Ames; Colin L Masters; Christopher C Rowe Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Eric D Hostetler; Abbas M Walji; Zhizhen Zeng; Patricia Miller; Idriss Bennacef; Cristian Salinas; Brett Connolly; Liza Gantert; Hyking Haley; Marie Holahan; Mona Purcell; Kerry Riffel; Talakad G Lohith; Paul Coleman; Aileen Soriano; Aimie Ogawa; Serena Xu; Xiaoping Zhang; Elizabeth Joshi; Joseph Della Rocca; David Hesk; David J Schenk; Jeffrey L Evelhoch Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Xianwei Sun; Prasad Admane; Zbigniew A Starosolski; Jason L Eriksen; Ananth V Annapragada; Eric A Tanifum Journal: ChemMedChem Date: 2021-11-08 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Ashley C Knight; Christopher D Morrone; Cassis Varlow; Wai Haung Yu; Paul McQuade; Neil Vasdev Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2022-10-18 Impact factor: 3.484
Authors: Xuyi Yue; Dhruva D Dhavale; Junfeng Li; Zonghua Luo; Jialu Liu; Hao Yang; Robert H Mach; Paul T Kotzbauer; Zhude Tu Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Kotaro Ogaki; Yuka A Martens; Michael G Heckman; Shunsuke Koga; Catherine Labbé; Oswaldo Lorenzo-Betancor; Anna I Wernick; Ronald L Walton; Alexandra I Soto; Emily R Vargas; Henrietta M Nielsen; Shinsuke Fujioka; Takahisa Kanekiyo; Ryan J Uitti; Jay A van Gerpen; William P Cheshire; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Phillip A Low; Wolfgang Singer; Dennis W Dickson; Guojun Bu; Owen A Ross Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 9.698
Authors: Luis M A Oliveira; Thomas Gasser; Robert Edwards; Markus Zweckstetter; Ronald Melki; Leonidas Stefanis; Hilal A Lashuel; David Sulzer; Kostas Vekrellis; Glenda M Halliday; Julianna J Tomlinson; Michael Schlossmacher; Poul Henning Jensen; Julia Schulze-Hentrich; Olaf Riess; Warren D Hirst; Omar El-Agnaf; Brit Mollenhauer; Peter Lansbury; Tiago F Outeiro Journal: NPJ Parkinsons Dis Date: 2021-07-26