Jeffrey M Caterino1, Robert Leininger2, David M Kline3, Lauren T Southerland1, Salman Khaliqdina1, Christopher W Baugh4, Daniel J Pallin4, Kurt B Stevenson2,5. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 3. Center for Biostatistics, Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of the Loeb criteria, emergency department (ED) physicians' diagnoses, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for acute bacterial infection in older adults with a criterion standard expert review. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Urban, tertiary-care ED. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older in the ED, excluding those who were incarcerated, underwent a trauma, did not speak English, or were unable to consent. MEASUREMENTS: Two physician experts identified bacterial infections using clinical judgement, participant surveys, and medical records; a third adjudicated in cases of disagreement. Agreement and test characteristics were measured for ED physician diagnosis, Loeb criteria, and CDC surveillance guidelines. RESULTS: Criterion-standard review identified bacterial infection in 77 of 424 participants (18%) (18 (4.2%) lower respiratory, 19 (4.5%) urinary tract (UTI), 22 (5.2%) gastrointestinal, 15 (3.5%) skin and soft tissue). ED physicians diagnosed infection in 71 (17%), but there were 33 with under- and 27 with overdiagnosis. Physician agreement with the criterion standard was moderate for infection overall and each infection type (κ = 0.48-0.59), but sensitivity was low (<67%), and the negative likelihood ratio (LR(-)) was greater than 0.30 for all infections. The Loeb criteria had poor sensitivity, agreement, and LR(-) for lower respiratory (50%, κ = 0.55; 0.51) and urinary tract infection (26%, κ = 0.34; 0.74), but 87% sensitivity (κ = 0.78; LR(-) 0.14) for skin and soft tissue infections. CDC guidelines had moderate agreement but poor sensitivity and LR(-). CONCLUSION: Emergency physicians often under- and overdiagnose infections in older adults. The Loeb criteria are useful only for diagnosing skin and soft tissue infections. CDC guidelines are inadequate in the ED. New criteria are needed to aid ED physicians in accurately diagnosing infection in older adults.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of the Loeb criteria, emergency department (ED) physicians' diagnoses, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for acute bacterial infection in older adults with a criterion standard expert review. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: Urban, tertiary-care ED. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older in the ED, excluding those who were incarcerated, underwent a trauma, did not speak English, or were unable to consent. MEASUREMENTS: Two physician experts identified bacterial infections using clinical judgement, participant surveys, and medical records; a third adjudicated in cases of disagreement. Agreement and test characteristics were measured for ED physician diagnosis, Loeb criteria, and CDC surveillance guidelines. RESULTS: Criterion-standard review identified bacterial infection in 77 of 424 participants (18%) (18 (4.2%) lower respiratory, 19 (4.5%) urinary tract (UTI), 22 (5.2%) gastrointestinal, 15 (3.5%) skin and soft tissue). ED physicians diagnosed infection in 71 (17%), but there were 33 with under- and 27 with overdiagnosis. Physician agreement with the criterion standard was moderate for infection overall and each infection type (κ = 0.48-0.59), but sensitivity was low (<67%), and the negative likelihood ratio (LR(-)) was greater than 0.30 for all infections. The Loeb criteria had poor sensitivity, agreement, and LR(-) for lower respiratory (50%, κ = 0.55; 0.51) and urinary tract infection (26%, κ = 0.34; 0.74), but 87% sensitivity (κ = 0.78; LR(-) 0.14) for skin and soft tissue infections. CDC guidelines had moderate agreement but poor sensitivity and LR(-). CONCLUSION: Emergency physicians often under- and overdiagnose infections in older adults. The Loeb criteria are useful only for diagnosing skin and soft tissue infections. CDC guidelines are inadequate in the ED. New criteria are needed to aid ED physicians in accurately diagnosing infection in older adults.
Authors: M Loeb; D W Bentley; S Bradley; K Crossley; R Garibaldi; N Gantz; A McGeer; R R Muder; J Mylotte; L E Nicolle; B Nurse; S Paton; A E Simor; P Smith; L Strausbaugh Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Nimalie D Stone; Muhammad S Ashraf; Jennifer Calder; Christopher J Crnich; Kent Crossley; Paul J Drinka; Carolyn V Gould; Manisha Juthani-Mehta; Ebbing Lautenbach; Mark Loeb; Taranisia Maccannell; Preeti N Malani; Lona Mody; Joseph M Mylotte; Lindsay E Nicolle; Mary-Claire Roghmann; Steven J Schweon; Andrew E Simor; Philip W Smith; Kurt B Stevenson; Suzanne F Bradley Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Tracy Onega; Megan Smith; Diana L Miglioretti; Patricia A Carney; Berta A Geller; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Robert D Rosenberg; Robert A Smith; Edward A Sickles; Sebastien Haneuse; Melissa L Anderson; Bonnie Yankaskas Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Jeffrey M Caterino; Julie A Stephens; Carlos A Camargo; Randell Wexler; Courtney Hebert; Lauren T Southerland; Katherine M Hunold; David S Hains; Jason J Bischof; Lai Wei; Alan J Wolfe; Andrew Schwaderer Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jeffrey M Caterino; David M Kline; Robert Leininger; Lauren T Southerland; Christopher R Carpenter; Christopher W Baugh; Daniel J Pallin; Katherine M Hunold; Kurt B Stevenson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-11-22 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lisa Mellhammar; Adam Linder; Jonas Tverring; Bertil Christensson; John H Boyd; Per Åkesson; Fredrik Kahn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Laura J Shallcross; Patrick Rockenschaub; David McNulty; Nick Freemantle; Andrew Hayward; Martin J Gill Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2020-05-19
Authors: Tessa Mzxk van Horrik; Suzanne E Geerlings; Janneke E Stalenhoef; Cees van Nieuwkoop; Joppe B Saanen; Caroline Schneeberger; Bart J Laan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Laura Shallcross; Patrick Rockenschaub; Ruth Blackburn; Irwin Nazareth; Nick Freemantle; Andrew Hayward Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 11.069