Mathias C Busch1,2, Stefan Gross1,2, Dietrich Alte3, Jan A Kors4, Henry Völzke2,3, Till Ittermann2,3, André Werner3, Anne Krüger1, Raila Busch1,2, Marcus Dörr1,2, Stephan B Felix1,2. 1. Department of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. 2. DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. 3. Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. 4. Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of extended monitoring of AF in the general population is unclear. The study evaluated the detection of AF using transtelephonic electrocardiography and the clinical relevance of additional AF findings, especially with regard to stroke risk and mortality. METHODS: The data of 1678 volunteers participating in the tele-ECG-subproject of the Study of Health in Pomerania was evaluated. Occurrence of AF as revealed by tele-ECG and conventional ECG was evaluated. Associations with mortality, history of stroke, and other clinical parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: AF was detected in 21 subjects (1.3%) by conventional ECG (ECG-AF) and in 43 (2.6%) by tele-ECG. All individuals with AF revealed by conventional ECG were also diagnosed to have AF by tele-ECG; 22 were diagnosed by tele-ECG only (Tele-AF). During follow-up (median: 6.3 years) 42/1635, 1/22, and 5/21 participants died in the no-AF-, tele-AF-, and ECG-AF groups (p < .001). Whereas, in comparison to the no-AF group, the risk of death was higher in the ECG-AF group (HR 9.4; 3.7-23.8; p < .001), there was no significant increase in mortality in the tele-AF group (HR 1.9; 0.26-14.0; p = .52). Prevalence of stroke history was higher in the ECG-AF group (19%; 5.5-42%) than with the no-AF (1.9%; 1.3-2.7%; p = .001) and the tele-AF groups (0%; 0-15%; p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Tele-ECG identifies significantly more AF cases in a population-based setting compared to conventional ECG. The impact of AF diagnosed only by extended monitoring differs from conventionally diagnosed AF. Additional studies are warranted, since this might have an impact on clinical management.
BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of extended monitoring of AF in the general population is unclear. The study evaluated the detection of AF using transtelephonic electrocardiography and the clinical relevance of additional AF findings, especially with regard to stroke risk and mortality. METHODS: The data of 1678 volunteers participating in the tele-ECG-subproject of the Study of Health in Pomerania was evaluated. Occurrence of AF as revealed by tele-ECG and conventional ECG was evaluated. Associations with mortality, history of stroke, and other clinical parameters were analyzed. RESULTS:AF was detected in 21 subjects (1.3%) by conventional ECG (ECG-AF) and in 43 (2.6%) by tele-ECG. All individuals with AF revealed by conventional ECG were also diagnosed to have AF by tele-ECG; 22 were diagnosed by tele-ECG only (Tele-AF). During follow-up (median: 6.3 years) 42/1635, 1/22, and 5/21 participants died in the no-AF-, tele-AF-, and ECG-AF groups (p < .001). Whereas, in comparison to the no-AF group, the risk of death was higher in the ECG-AF group (HR 9.4; 3.7-23.8; p < .001), there was no significant increase in mortality in the tele-AF group (HR 1.9; 0.26-14.0; p = .52). Prevalence of stroke history was higher in the ECG-AF group (19%; 5.5-42%) than with the no-AF (1.9%; 1.3-2.7%; p = .001) and the tele-AF groups (0%; 0-15%; p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Tele-ECG identifies significantly more AF cases in a population-based setting compared to conventional ECG. The impact of AF diagnosed only by extended monitoring differs from conventionally diagnosed AF. Additional studies are warranted, since this might have an impact on clinical management.
Authors: Valentin Fuster; Lars E Rydén; David S Cannom; Harry J Crijns; Anne B Curtis; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Jonathan L Halperin; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; G Neal Kay; James E Lowe; S Bertil Olsson; Eric N Prystowsky; Juan Luis Tamargo; Samuel Wann; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffery L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Jonathan L Halperin; Sharon Ann Hunt; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Silvia G Priori; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Andrzej Budaj; A John Camm; Veronica Dean; Jaap W Deckers; Catherine Despres; Kenneth Dickstein; John Lekakis; Keith McGregor; Marco Metra; Joao Morais; Ady Osterspey; Juan Luis Tamargo; José Luis Zamorano Journal: Europace Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Henry Völzke; Dietrich Alte; Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Dörte Radke; Roberto Lorbeer; Nele Friedrich; Nicole Aumann; Katharina Lau; Michael Piontek; Gabriele Born; Christoph Havemann; Till Ittermann; Sabine Schipf; Robin Haring; Sebastian E Baumeister; Henri Wallaschofski; Matthias Nauck; Stephanie Frick; Andreas Arnold; Michael Jünger; Julia Mayerle; Matthias Kraft; Markus M Lerch; Marcus Dörr; Thorsten Reffelmann; Klaus Empen; Stephan B Felix; Anne Obst; Beate Koch; Sven Gläser; Ralf Ewert; Ingo Fietze; Thomas Penzel; Martina Dören; Wolfgang Rathmann; Johannes Haerting; Mario Hannemann; Jürgen Röpcke; Ulf Schminke; Clemens Jürgens; Frank Tost; Rainer Rettig; Jan A Kors; Saskia Ungerer; Katrin Hegenscheid; Jens-Peter Kühn; Julia Kühn; Norbert Hosten; Ralf Puls; Jörg Henke; Oliver Gloger; Alexander Teumer; Georg Homuth; Uwe Völker; Christian Schwahn; Birte Holtfreter; Ines Polzer; Thomas Kohlmann; Hans J Grabe; Dieter Rosskopf; Heyo K Kroemer; Thomas Kocher; Reiner Biffar; Ulrich John; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Yoko Miyasaka; Marion E Barnes; Bernard J Gersh; Stephen S Cha; Kent R Bailey; Walter P Abhayaratna; James B Seward; Teresa S M Tsang Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-07-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Dietrich Alte; Henry Völzke; Daniel M Robinson; Volker Kleine; Hans Jörgen Grabe; Ulrich John; Stephan B Felix Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2006 Impact factor: 6.184
Authors: Taya V Glotzer; Emile G Daoud; D George Wyse; Daniel E Singer; Michael D Ezekowitz; Christopher Hilker; Clayton Miller; Dongfeng Qi; Paul D Ziegler Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2009-08-04
Authors: Stefan H Hohnloser; Dimitri Pajitnev; Janice Pogue; Jeff S Healey; Marc A Pfeffer; Salim Yusuf; Stuart J Connolly Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-11-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jonas Bjerring Olesen; Gregory Y H Lip; Morten Lock Hansen; Peter Riis Hansen; Janne Schurmann Tolstrup; Jesper Lindhardsen; Christian Selmer; Ole Ahlehoff; Anne-Marie Schjerning Olsen; Gunnar Hilmar Gislason; Christian Torp-Pedersen Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-01-31
Authors: Giuseppe Boriani; Taya V Glotzer; Massimo Santini; Teena M West; Mirko De Melis; Milan Sepsi; Maurizio Gasparini; Thorsten Lewalter; John A Camm; Daniel E Singer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Mathias C Busch; Stefan Gross; Dietrich Alte; Jan A Kors; Henry Völzke; Till Ittermann; André Werner; Anne Krüger; Raila Busch; Marcus Dörr; Stephan B Felix Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 1.468