Jong-Chan Youn1,2, Yoo Jin Hong3, Hye-Jeong Lee4, Kyunghwa Han4, Chi Young Shim2, Geu-Ru Hong2, Young Joo Suh4, Jin Hur4, Young Jin Kim4, Byoung Wook Choi4, Seok-Min Kang2. 1. Division of Cardiology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea. 2. Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. uzzin@yuhs.ac. 4. Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)-based extracellular volume fraction (ECV) in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) and compare it with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) parameters. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, cohort study of 117 NIDCM patients (71 men, 51.9 ± 16.7 years) who underwent clinical 3.0-T CMR. Myocardial ECV and LGE were quantified on the left ventricular myocardium. The presence of midwall LGE was also detected. Nineteen healthy subjects served as controls. The primary end points were cardiovascular (CV) events defined by CV death, rehospitalization due to heart failure, and heart transplantation. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (median duration, 11.2 months; 25th-75th percentile, 7.8-21.9 months), the primary end points occurred in 19 patients (16.2%). The ECV (per 3% and 1% increase) was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.80 and 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-2.20 and 1.14-1.30, respectively; p < 0.001) for the CV events. Multivariable analysis also indicated that ECV was an independent prognostic factor and had a higher prognostic value (Harrell's c statistic, 0.88) than LGE quantification values (0.77) or midwall LGE (0.80). CONCLUSION: CMR-based ECV independently predicts the clinical outcome in NIDCM patients. KEY POINTS: • T1-mapping-based ECV is a useful parameter of risk stratification in NIDCM • ECV has a higher prognostic value than LGE • Contrast-enhanced T1-mapping CMR is a feasible and safe method.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)-based extracellular volume fraction (ECV) in patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) and compare it with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) parameters. METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective, cohort study of 117 NIDCM patients (71 men, 51.9 ± 16.7 years) who underwent clinical 3.0-T CMR. Myocardial ECV and LGE were quantified on the left ventricular myocardium. The presence of midwall LGE was also detected. Nineteen healthy subjects served as controls. The primary end points were cardiovascular (CV) events defined by CV death, rehospitalization due to heart failure, and heart transplantation. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (median duration, 11.2 months; 25th-75th percentile, 7.8-21.9 months), the primary end points occurred in 19 patients (16.2%). The ECV (per 3% and 1% increase) was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.80 and 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-2.20 and 1.14-1.30, respectively; p < 0.001) for the CV events. Multivariable analysis also indicated that ECV was an independent prognostic factor and had a higher prognostic value (Harrell's c statistic, 0.88) than LGE quantification values (0.77) or midwall LGE (0.80). CONCLUSION: CMR-based ECV independently predicts the clinical outcome in NIDCM patients. KEY POINTS: • T1-mapping-based ECV is a useful parameter of risk stratification in NIDCM • ECV has a higher prognostic value than LGE • Contrast-enhanced T1-mapping CMR is a feasible and safe method.
Entities:
Keywords:
Extracellular space; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardium; Prognosis; T1 mapping
Authors: Martin Ugander; Abiola J Oki; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Andreas Greiser; Anthony H Aletras; Christopher T Sibley; Marcus Y Chen; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack S Shanewise; Scott D Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William J Stewart Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Yoo Jin Hong; Chul Hwan Park; Young Jin Kim; Jin Hur; Hye-Jeong Lee; Sae Rom Hong; Young Joo Suh; Andreas Greiser; Mun Young Paek; Byoung Wook Choi; Tae Hoon Kim Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: H Arheden; M Saeed; C B Higgins; D W Gao; J Bremerich; R Wyttenbach; M W Dae; M F Wendland Journal: Radiology Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sujith Kuruvilla; Nebiyu Adenaw; Arabindra B Katwal; Michael J Lipinski; Christopher M Kramer; Michael Salerno Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-12-20 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: J A McCrohon; J C C Moon; S K Prasad; W J McKenna; C H Lorenz; A J S Coats; D J Pennell Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Fabian aus dem Siepen; Sebastian J Buss; Daniel Messroghli; Florian Andre; Dirk Lossnitzer; Sebastian Seitz; Marius Keller; Philipp A Schnabel; Evangelos Giannitsis; Grigorios Korosoglou; Hugo A Katus; Henning Steen Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Christopher A Miller; Josephine H Naish; Paul Bishop; Glyn Coutts; David Clark; Sha Zhao; Simon G Ray; Nizar Yonan; Simon G Williams; Andrew S Flett; James C Moon; Andreas Greiser; Geoffrey J M Parker; Matthias Schmitt Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Ankur Gulati; Andrew Jabbour; Tevfik F Ismail; Kaushik Guha; Jahanzaib Khwaja; Sadaf Raza; Kishen Morarji; Tristan D H Brown; Nizar A Ismail; Marc R Dweck; Elisa Di Pietro; Michael Roughton; Ricardo Wage; Yousef Daryani; Rory O'Hanlon; Mary N Sheppard; Francisco Alpendurada; Alexander R Lyon; Stuart A Cook; Martin R Cowie; Ravi G Assomull; Dudley J Pennell; Sanjay K Prasad Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Francesco Sardanelli; Simone Schiaffino; Moreno Zanardo; Francesco Secchi; Paola Maria Cannaò; Federico Ambrogi; Giovanni Di Leo Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-05-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Wadi Mawad; Luc Mertens; Joseph J Pagano; Eugenie Riesenkampff; Marjolein J E Reichert; Seema Mital; Paul F Kantor; Mark Greenberg; Peter Liu; Paul C Nathan; Lars Grosse-Wortmann Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 6.875