Literature DB >> 26721699

Conventional over-the-top-aiming devices with short offset fail to hit the center of the human femoral ACL footprint in medial portal technique, whereas medial-portal-aiming devices with larger offset hit the center reliably.

Christoph Domnick1, Mirco Herbort2, Michael J Raschke1, Susanne Bremer1, Benedikt Schliemann1, Wolf Petersen3, Thore Zantop4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of a conventional over-the-top-guide (OTG) with a typically short offset to hit the center of the native femoral ACL footprint through the anteromedial portal in comparison to a specific medial-portal-aimer (MPA) with larger offset.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 20 matched human cadaveric knees, insertion sites of the ACL were marked in medial arthrotomy. An OTG with an offset of 5.5 mm, respectively, the MPA with 9 mm offset was used in a medial portal approach to locate the center of a single bundle ACL reconstruction tunnel with k-wires. Distances from the footprint center, the OTG drilling and the MPA drilling to the roof of the intercondylar notch and to the deep cartilage margin were determined. After positioning of radiological markers, radiographic analysis was performed according to the quadrant technique as described by Bernard and Hertel.
RESULTS: The distance from ACL origin to the roof of the notch was 10.3 (±2.1) mm, in the OTG group 6.7 (±1.5) mm and in the MPA group 9.6 (±1.9) mm. The distance to the deep cartilage margin was 9.5 (±1.7) mm from ACL origin, 4.8 (±1.3) mm with OTG and 8.7 (±1.4) mm with MPA. There were statistically significant differences between the distances of the footprint center and the OTG group after measuring and also after radiographic analysis (p < 0.0001). Using the MPA, no significant different distances in comparison to the anatomical ACL center were found (p > 0.0001). There was an increased risk for femoral blow (9/10 vs. 0/10) in the OTG group after overdrilling with a 9 mm drill.
CONCLUSION: Short (5.5 mm) offset femoral aiming devices fail to locate the native ACL footprint center in medial portal approach with an increased risk for femoral blowout when overdrilling. The special medial-portal-aiming device with 9 mm offset hit the center reliably.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, single-bundle; Medial portal technique

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26721699     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2394-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  3 in total

1.  The posterior horn of the lateral meniscus is a reliable novel landmark for femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Weiler; Michael Wagner; Christoph Kittl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  High incidence of partially anatomic tunnel placement in primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrea Achtnich; Francesco Ranuccio; Lukas Willinger; Jonas Pogorzelski; Andreas B Imhoff; Sepp Braun; Elmar Herbst
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Trends in Primary Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Practice in Adult Patients Prevalent Among Arthroscopy Surgeons of Six Southern States of India.

Authors:  Vivek Pandey; Sandesh Madi; Chirag Thonse; Clement Joseph; David Rajan; Jacob Varughese; Jai Thilak; P S Jayaprasad; Kiran Acharya; Krishna Gopal Ramamurthy; Raghuveer Reddy; Rajkumar Amravathi; Sharath Rao; Sridhar Gangavarapu; Moparthi Srinivas; Sujit Jose; S R Sundararjan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 1.033

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.