Literature DB >> 28439522

Automatic image quality assessment and measurement of fetal head in two-dimensional ultrasound image.

Lei Zhang1, Nicholas J Dudley2, Tryphon Lambrou1, Nigel Allinson1, Xujiong Ye1.   

Abstract

Owing to the inconsistent image quality existing in routine obstetric ultrasound (US) scans that leads to a large intraobserver and interobserver variability, the aim of this study is to develop a quality-assured, fully automated US fetal head measurement system. A texton-based fetal head segmentation is used as a prerequisite step to obtain the head region. Textons are calculated using a filter bank designed specific for US fetal head structure. Both shape- and anatomic-based features calculated from the segmented head region are then fed into a random forest classifier to determine the quality of the image (e.g., whether the image is acquired from a correct imaging plane), from which fetal head measurements [biparietal diameter (BPD), occipital-frontal diameter (OFD), and head circumference (HC)] are derived. The experimental results show a good performance of our method for US quality assessment and fetal head measurements. The overall precision for automatic image quality assessment is 95.24% with 87.5% sensitivity and 100% specificity, while segmentation performance shows 99.27% ([Formula: see text]) of accuracy, 97.07% ([Formula: see text]) of sensitivity, 2.23 mm ([Formula: see text]) of the maximum symmetric contour distance, and 0.84 mm ([Formula: see text]) of the average symmetric contour distance. The statistical analysis results using paired [Formula: see text]-test and Bland-Altman plots analysis indicate that the 95% limits of agreement for inter observer variability between the automated measurements and the senior expert measurements are 2.7 mm of BPD, 5.8 mm of OFD, and 10.4 mm of HC, whereas the mean differences are [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and [Formula: see text], respectively. These narrow 95% limits of agreements indicate a good level of consistency between the automated and the senior expert's measurements.

Keywords:  fetal head biometric measurements; image quality assessment; random forest classifier; texton feature; ultrasound fetal segmentation

Year:  2017        PMID: 28439522      PMCID: PMC5393312          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.2.024001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  23 in total

1.  The importance of quality management in fetal measurement.

Authors:  N J Dudley; E Chapman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of fetal biometry.

Authors:  S C Perni; F A Chervenak; R B Kalish; S Magherini-Rothe; M Predanic; J Streltzoff; D W Skupski
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  I Sarris; C Ioannou; P Chamberlain; E Ohuma; F Roseman; L Hoch; D G Altman; A T Papageorghiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation.

Authors:  Pablo Arbeláez; Michael Maire; Charless Fowlkes; Jitendra Malik
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  Segmentation of ultrasound images of fetal anatomic structures using random forest for low-cost settings.

Authors:  Evelyn Arthur Anto; Benjamin Amoah; Alessandro Crimi
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015-08

6.  Segmentation of fetal ultrasound images.

Authors:  Sandra M G V B Jardim; Mário A T Figueiredo
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Evaluation and comparison of current fetal ultrasound image segmentation methods for biometric measurements: a grand challenge.

Authors:  Sylvia Rueda; Sana Fathima; Caroline L Knight; Mohammad Yaqub; Aris T Papageorghiou; Bahbibi Rahmatullah; Alessandro Foi; Matteo Maggioni; Antonietta Pepe; Jussi Tohka; Richard V Stebbing; John E McManigle; Anca Ciurte; Xavier Bresson; Meritxell Bach Cuadra; Changming Sun; Gennady V Ponomarev; Mikhail S Gelfand; Marat D Kazanov; Ching-Wei Wang; Hsiang-Chou Chen; Chun-Wei Peng; Chu-Mei Hung; J Alison Noble
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Does the use of automated fetal biometry improve clinical work flow efficiency?

Authors:  Jimmy Espinoza; Sara Good; Evie Russell; Wesley Lee
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Finding the most accurate method to measure head circumference for fetal weight estimation.

Authors:  Ulrike Schmidt; Dunja Temerinac; Katharina Bildstein; Benjamin Tuschy; Jade Mayer; Marc Sütterlin; Jörn Siemer; Sven Kehl
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  5 in total

1.  Are ultrasound foetal circumference measurement methods interchangeable?

Authors:  Nicholas John Dudley
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2019-03-07

2.  Automatic quality assessment for 2D fetal sonographic standard plane based on multitask learning.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Han Liu; Hong Luo; Kejun Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Robotic Ultrasound Scanning With Real-Time Image-Based Force Adjustment: Quick Response for Enabling Physical Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Mojtaba Akbari; Jay Carriere; Tyler Meyer; Ron Sloboda; Siraj Husain; Nawaid Usmani; Mahdi Tavakoli
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-03-22

4.  RDHCformer: Fusing ResDCN and Transformers for Fetal Head Circumference Automatic Measurement in 2D Ultrasound Images.

Authors:  Chaoran Yang; Shanshan Liao; Zeyu Yang; Jiaqi Guo; Zhichao Zhang; Yingjian Yang; Yingwei Guo; Shaowei Yin; Caixia Liu; Yan Kang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-29

5.  The role of head circumference and cerebral volumes to phenotype male adults with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Niklaus Denier; Gerrit Steinberg; Ludger Tebartz van Elst; Tobias Bracht
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.708

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.