Literature DB >> 28439427

Double aorta artifact in sonography - a diagnostic challenge.

Robert Hadzik1, Przemysław Bombiński2, Michał Brzewski2.   

Abstract

The double aorta artifact was described and studied thoroughly twenty-five years ago. Despite this, it is still not commonly known today and can cause diagnostic difficulty. Total aortic duplication can be considered an anatomic defect whilst partial duplication mimics aortic dissection. In the literature, this artifact has been compared with a very rare anomaly, i.e. the occurrence of two aortas in one patient. Currently, however, the differentiation of this artifact from abdominal aortic dissection seems to be of greater significance. The double aorta image occurs when ultrasound waves encounter prismatic fat tissue of the anterior abdominal wall. This artifact is more frequently observed in children and athletic young adults since the structure of this anatomic region in these individuals is conductive to the occurrence of this phenomenon. Moreover, it can be observed more often when curved transducers are used. Due to all these factors, an ultrasound beam undergoes greater refraction and make the artifact clearer. This phenomenon is usually easily recognizable and avoidable, but it sometimes might cause diagnostic difficulty. Obtaining an image of double abdominal vessels on ultrasound examination in transverse sections requires further inspection of the aorta in a different (sagittal) plane. This is not always possible due to poor patient preparation for scanning. Symmetrical flow on Doppler sonography is a typical feature of this artifact. Finally, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography can be considered to rule out a pathology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acoustic prism; artifacts; child; duplication artifact; ultrasound

Year:  2017        PMID: 28439427      PMCID: PMC5392552          DOI: 10.15557/JoU.2017.0005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrason        ISSN: 2084-8404


  8 in total

1.  [The double aorta--rarity or artifact of ultrasound].

Authors:  J P Heyne
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.548

2.  Aortic duplication artefact in a 14-year-old girl.

Authors:  Simone Alyson Mandelstam; Cain Brockley
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-01-31

3.  [Double aorta].

Authors:  J E Mosquera; R Micarelli
Journal:  Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba       Date:  1975 Jan-Dec

4.  Duplication of abdominal aorta: a very rare congenital anomaly but a common ultrasound artifact.

Authors:  J-Y Meuwly; A-S Knopfli; G Gullo
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 6.548

5.  Acoustic prism causing sonographic duplication artifact in the upper abdomen.

Authors:  F N Vandeman; J W Meilstrup; P A Nealey
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  [Case of double aorta with vasorenal hypertension].

Authors:  G V Trubnikov; D A Naĭmark; M S Nalobina; A Ia Kolomiets
Journal:  Klin Med (Mosk)       Date:  1977-02

7.  Correction of distortion in US images caused by subcutaneous tissues: results in tissue phantoms and human subjects.

Authors:  D A Carpenter; G Kossoff; K A Griffiths
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  CT appearance of a patent impar umbilical artery in an adult woman and related anomalies: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Bernhard Glodny; Benjamin Henninger; Karin Hofmann; Thomas Trieb; Johannes Petersen; Peter Rehder
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-01-20
  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Refraction artifact on abdominal sonogram.

Authors:  Hiroko Naganuma; Hideaki Ishida; Atsushi Uno; Hiroshi Nagai; Masahiro Ogawa; Naohisa Kamiyama
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 1.314

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.