Literature DB >> 34021821

Refraction artifact on abdominal sonogram.

Hiroko Naganuma1, Hideaki Ishida2, Atsushi Uno3, Hiroshi Nagai4, Masahiro Ogawa5, Naohisa Kamiyama6.   

Abstract

Ultrasonography (US) is the first-line diagnostic tool for observing the whole abdomen. Unfortunately, a wide spectrum of refraction-related artefactual images is very frequently encountered in routine US examinations. In addition, most practitioners currently perform abdominal US examinations without sufficient knowledge of refraction artifacts (RAs). This review article was designed to present many representative RA images seen in the clinical setting, with a brief explanation of the mechanism of these images, in certain cases through an analyzed and reconstructed method using computer simulation that supports clinical observations. RAs are encountered not only with B-mode US but also with Doppler US, contrast-enhanced US, and shear wave elastography. RAs change their appearance according to the situation, but they always have a significant effect on detailed interpretation of abdominal US images. Correct diagnosis of abdominal US relies on a deep understanding of each characteristic artifactual finding, which necessitates knowledge of basic US physics. When analyzing mass lesions, computer simulation analysis helps to reveal the global images of RAs around a lesion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdomen; Artifact; Computer analysis; Sound refraction; Ultrasound

Year:  2021        PMID: 34021821     DOI: 10.1007/s10396-021-01097-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)        ISSN: 1346-4523            Impact factor:   1.314


  28 in total

1.  Image distortion in US-guided liver tumor puncture with curved linear array.

Authors:  Kei Konno; Hideaki Ishida; Tomoya Komatsuda; Hiroko Naganuma; Michiko Sato; Yuki Hamashima; Sumio Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-12-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Mobile echoes in liver cysts: a form of range-ambiguity artifact.

Authors:  Hiroko Naganuma; Hideaki Ishida; Masato Funaoka; Shusei Fujimori; Atushi Okuyama; Masaru Odashima; Satoko Takeuchi; Akihiko Hanaoka
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.910

3.  Origins of the edge shadowing artefact in medical ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Robin Steel; Tamie L Poepping; Rosemary S Thompson; Charles Macaskill
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 4.  Point-of-care ultrasonography.

Authors:  Christopher L Moore; Joshua A Copel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Effect of scan format on refraction artifacts.

Authors:  M C Ziskin; P S LaFollette; K Blathras; V Abraham
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Acoustic artifacts and reverberation shadows in gallbladder sonograms: their cause and clinical implications.

Authors:  T Franquet; J M Bescos; J Barberena; M Montes
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1990

7.  Radiologist and Sonographer Interpretation Discrepancies for Biliary Sonographic Findings: Our Experience.

Authors:  Adrian Dawkins; Nanditha George; Halemane Ganesh; Andres Ayoob; James Lee; Rashmi Nair; Cassie Kiper; Kevin Duncan; Scott Stevens
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.657

Review 8.  Ultrasound imaging artifacts: How to recognize them and how to avoid them.

Authors:  Mary M Quien; Muhamed Saric
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 1.724

9.  Liver tumors in fatty liver: difficulty in ultrasonographic interpretation.

Authors:  K Konno; H Ishida; M Sato; T Komatsuda; J Ishida; H Naganuma; Y Hamashima; S Watanabe
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

10.  Splenic lymphoma: differentiation from splenic cyst with ultrasonography.

Authors:  H Ishida; K Konno; J Ishida; H Naganuma; T Komatsuda; M Sato; S Watanabe
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.