| Literature DB >> 28439224 |
Anton R Lord1,2,3, Meng Li2,4, Liliana R Demenescu1,2, Johan van den Meer2,4,5, Viola Borchardt2, Anna Linda Krause2,6, Hans-Jochen Heinze1,4,7, Michael Breakspear3,8, Martin Walter1,2,6,7,9.
Abstract
The brain's connectivity skeleton-a rich club of strongly interconnected members-was initially shown to exist in human structural networks, but recent evidence suggests a functional counterpart. This rich club typically includes key regions (or hubs) from multiple canonical networks, reducing the cost of inter-network communication. The posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), a hub node embedded within the default mode network, is known to facilitate communication between brain networks and is a key member of the "rich club." Here, we assessed how metabolic signatures of neuronal integrity and cortical thickness influence the global extent of a functional rich club as measured using the functional rich club coefficient (fRCC). Rich club estimation was performed on functional connectivity of resting state brain signals acquired at 3T in 48 healthy adult subjects. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy was measured in the same session using a point resolved spectroscopy sequence. We confirmed convergence of functional rich club with a previously established structural rich club. N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) in the PCC is significantly correlated with age (p = 0.001), while the rich club coefficient showed no effect of age (p = 0.106). In addition, we found a significant quadratic relationship between fRCC and NAA concentration in PCC (p = 0.009). Furthermore, cortical thinning in the PCC was correlated with a reduced rich club coefficient after accounting for age and NAA. In conclusion, we found that the fRCC is related to a marker of neuronal integrity in a key region of the cingulate cortex. Furthermore, cortical thinning in the same area was observed, suggesting that both cortical thinning and neuronal integrity in the hub regions influence functional integration of at a whole brain level.Entities:
Keywords: MRS; aged; cortical thickness; fMRI; graph metric
Year: 2017 PMID: 28439224 PMCID: PMC5384321 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Figure 1Placement of MRS voxel in the PCC. An exemplar spectra for the MRS signal is on the right.
Figure 2Rich club members.
Rich club members.
| 45 | Frontal Sup Orb R |
| 44 | Frontal Mid L |
| 43 | Rostral ACC R |
| 43 | Pregenual ACC R |
| 42 | Temporal Sup R |
| 41 | Rostal ACC L |
| 40 | Post Insula R |
| 38 | Temporal Sup L |
| 37 | Thalamus R |
| 36 | Temporal Pole Sup L |
| 35 | Frontal Inf Tri L |
| 34 | Posterior MCC R |
| 33 | Caudate R |
| 33 | 23d L |
| 32 | dPCC R |
| 31 | Frontal Inf Orb L |
| 31 | vPCC L |
| 30 | Occipital Mid R |
| 30 | Occipital Inf L |
| 28 | Medial Prefront Upper R |
| 26 | Anterior Insula L |
Figure 3Linear correlates of age with (A) NAA (r = −0.456, p = 0.001, t = −3.475, df = 46) and (B) rich club coefficient (r = 0.2356, p = 0.107, t = 1.644, df = 46).
Figure 4Quadratic relationship between RCC and NAA/Cr. The equation for this curve is: y = 1.933 – 0.621x + 0.127x2 where x is the rich club coefficient.
Figure 5Positive correlation between RCC and CTh (FDR corrected) incorporating age and NAA as covariates. Blue represents FDR corrected significant differences. Red/yellow represent FWE corrected significant differences.
Figure 6Partial correlation between the rich club coefficient and mean cortical thickness in the PCC (.