| Literature DB >> 31632250 |
Felicia von Düring1, Inka Ristow1, Meng Li1,2, Dominik Denzel1, Lejla Colic1,3,4, Liliana Ramona Demenescu1, Shijia Li1,5, Viola Borchardt1,3, Thomas Liebe1, Matthias Vogel6, Martin Walter1,2,3,7,8,9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brain investigations identified salience network (SN) comprising the dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex (dACC) and the Anterior Insula (AI). Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) studies revealed the link between the glutamate concentration in the ACC and alterations in attentional scope. Hence, we investigated whether glutamate concentration in the dACC modulates brain response during salience processing.Entities:
Keywords: MRS; PCC; attention; fMRI; glutamate; salience attribution
Year: 2019 PMID: 31632250 PMCID: PMC6783560 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Behav Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5153 Impact factor: 3.558
FIGURE 1(A) Task activation of the contrast P > fix. Blue color represents deactivation clusters, red color depicts activation clusters. Displayed with BrainNet Viewer (Xia et al., 2013), p < 0.05 FWE, cluster level corrected, with initial threshold p < 0.001, k size > 191, n = 31 subjects. (B–E) Bar plots: Extracted mean beta estimates from the PCC correlation cluster (light blue and yellow shown in Figure 2A) for all picture conditions and subconditions versus fixation, showing differential deactivation. Down-pointing arrows in subconditions indicate negative correlation with the Glu/tCr level in dACC. Higher Glu/tCr in the dACC, more deactivation during certain condition is present. Data is presented in mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), n = 31. P, all expected and unexpected emotional and sexual pictures; Psex, expected and unexpected sexual pictures; Pemo, expected and unexpected emotional pictures; uPemo, unexpected emotional pictures; xPemo, expected emotional pictures; uPsex, unexpected sexual pictures; xPsex, expected sexual pictures.
FIGURE 2(A) Dark blue: Main effect of task in the PCC for contrast P < fix. Yellow: Negative correlation between the BOLD response for contrast P > fix in the PCC and Glu/tCr in the dACC. Light blue: Overlap of the PCC clusters, MNI [3 –30 25]. (B) Red: BOLD response for contrast Psex > Pemo in the PCC correlates significantly negatively with the dACC Glu/tCr, MNI peak: [2 –28 26]. Yellow: BOLD response for contrast Psex > fix in the PCC correlates significantly negatively with the dACC Glu/tCr, MNI peak: [2 –28 26]. Light blue: overlap of both PCC clusters. Dark blue: overlap of both displayed PCC clusters plus the overlap cluster from (A) (light blue and yellow). (C) Dark green: Task effect in the PCC/Precuneus in contrast xPemo < uPemo, MNI peak [–14 –52 26]; Light green: Negative correlation of the Glu/tCr in dACC and BOLD response in contrast xPemo < uPemo, MNI peak [–10 –38 34]; Bright green: Overlap of both PCC clusters. (D) Overlapping VS clusters. Dark green: Positive correlation of Glu/tCr in dACC and BOLD response for xPemo > uPemo in VS and sgACC MNI peak [2 20 –2]; Light green: Positive correlation of Glu/tCr in dACC and VS BOLD mean estimates for the contrast xPemo > fix, MNI peak: [–2 24 0]; Bright green: overlap of both clusters (note: the light green cluster largely overlaps with the bright green thus is mainly represented in bright green). All pictures are displayed using Mango Software (Lancaster et al.; www.ric.uthscsa.edu/mango), p < 0.05 FWE, cluster level corrected, with initial threshold p < 0.001 n = 27.
FIGURE 3(A) Scatter plots. Black line: Significant negative correlation of the Glu/tCr residuals in dACC and PCC BOLD response for Psex > fix (p = 0.003, ρ = –0.556, n = 27); Gray dotted line: Non-significant correlation of Glu/tCr residuals and PCC BOLD response for Pemo > fix (p = 0.217, ρ = 0.313, n = 27). Slopes are significantly different (p < 0.001). Beta estimates were extracted from the correlation cluster (light blue and yellow) shown in Figure 2A. (B) Black dotted line: Non-significant negative correlation of Glu/tCr residuals in the dACC and PCC BOLD response uPemo > fix (p = 0.462, ρ = –0.148, n = 27). Gray dotted line: Non-significant correlation of Glu/tCr residuals in the dACC and PCC BOLD response for xPemo > fix (p = 0.980, ρ = 0.183, n = 27). Beta estimates were extracted from the correlation cluster (light green and bright green) shown in Figure 2C. (C) Gray line: Positive correlation between xPemo > fix and Glu/tCr residuals in dACC (p = 0.004, ρ = 0.539, n = 27). Black dotted line: Non-significant negative correlation between uPemo > fix and Glu/tCr residuals in dACC (p = 0.075, ρ = –0.348, n = 27). Beta estimates were extracted from the bright green correlation cluster shown in Figure 2D. (D) Mean beta estimates for xPemo > fix and uPemo > fix represent a relative signal increase for the unexpected condition. Data is presented in mean ± standard error mean (SEM). Beta estimates were extracted from the bright green correlation cluster shown in Figure 2D.