Literature DB >> 28437848

Inferring network structure in non-normal and mixed discrete-continuous genomic data.

Anindya Bhadra1, Arvind Rao2, Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani3.   

Abstract

Inferring dependence structure through undirected graphs is crucial for uncovering the major modes of multivariate interaction among high-dimensional genomic markers that are potentially associated with cancer. Traditionally, conditional independence has been studied using sparse Gaussian graphical models for continuous data and sparse Ising models for discrete data. However, there are two clear situations when these approaches are inadequate. The first occurs when the data are continuous but display non-normal marginal behavior such as heavy tails or skewness, rendering an assumption of normality inappropriate. The second occurs when a part of the data is ordinal or discrete (e.g., presence or absence of a mutation) and the other part is continuous (e.g., expression levels of genes or proteins). In this case, the existing Bayesian approaches typically employ a latent variable framework for the discrete part that precludes inferring conditional independence among the data that are actually observed. The current article overcomes these two challenges in a unified framework using Gaussian scale mixtures. Our framework is able to handle continuous data that are not normal and data that are of mixed continuous and discrete nature, while still being able to infer a sparse conditional sign independence structure among the observed data. Extensive performance comparison in simulations with alternative techniques and an analysis of a real cancer genomics data set demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
© 2017, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian methods; Conditional sign independence; Genomic data; Graphical models; Mixed discrete and continuous data; Scale mixtures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28437848      PMCID: PMC5654714          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Cameron W Brennan; Roel G W Verhaak; Aaron McKenna; Benito Campos; Houtan Noushmehr; Sofie R Salama; Siyuan Zheng; Debyani Chakravarty; J Zachary Sanborn; Samuel H Berman; Rameen Beroukhim; Brady Bernard; Chang-Jiun Wu; Giannicola Genovese; Ilya Shmulevich; Jill Barnholtz-Sloan; Lihua Zou; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Sachet A Shukla; Giovanni Ciriello; W K Yung; Wei Zhang; Carrie Sougnez; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth Aldape; Darell D Bigner; Erwin G Van Meir; Michael Prados; Andrew Sloan; Keith L Black; Jennifer Eschbacher; Gaetano Finocchiaro; William Friedman; David W Andrews; Abhijit Guha; Mary Iacocca; Brian P O'Neill; Greg Foltz; Jerome Myers; Daniel J Weisenberger; Robert Penny; Raju Kucherlapati; Charles M Perou; D Neil Hayes; Richard Gibbs; Marco Marra; Gordon B Mills; Eric Lander; Paul Spellman; Richard Wilson; Chris Sander; John Weinstein; Matthew Meyerson; Stacey Gabriel; Peter W Laird; David Haussler; Gad Getz; Lynda Chin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Genome changes and gene expression in human solid tumors.

Authors:  J W Gray; C Collins
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Selection and estimation for mixed graphical models.

Authors:  Shizhe Chen; Daniela M Witten; Ali Shojaie
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.445

5.  Learning the Structure of Mixed Graphical Models.

Authors:  Jason D Lee; Trevor J Hastie
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.302

6.  Influence of p53 mutations on prognosis of patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Shoji Shiraishi; Kenji Tada; Hideo Nakamura; Keishi Makino; Masato Kochi; Hideyuki Saya; Jun-ichi Kuratsu; Yukitaka Ushio
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Graphical Models via Univariate Exponential Family Distributions.

Authors:  Eunho Yang; Pradeep Ravikumar; Genevera I Allen; Zhandong Liu
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.654

Review 8.  Malignant astrocytic glioma: genetics, biology, and paths to treatment.

Authors:  Frank B Furnari; Tim Fenton; Robert M Bachoo; Akitake Mukasa; Jayne M Stommel; Alexander Stegh; William C Hahn; Keith L Ligon; David N Louis; Cameron Brennan; Lynda Chin; Ronald A DePinho; Webster K Cavenee
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Non-gaussian distributions affect identification of expression patterns, functional annotation, and prospective classification in human cancer genomes.

Authors:  Nicholas F Marko; Robert J Weil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Hierarchical Normalized Completely Random Measures for Robust Graphical Modeling.

Authors:  Andrea Cremaschi; Raffaele Argiento; Katherine Shoemaker; Christine Peterson; Marina Vannucci
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.728

2.  Using Bayesian Latent Gaussian Graphical Models to Infer Symptom Associations in Verbal Autopsies.

Authors:  Zehang Richard Li; Tyler H McComick; Samuel J Clark
Journal:  Bayesian Anal       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.728

Review 3.  Bayesian graphical models for modern biological applications.

Authors:  Yang Ni; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Marina Vannucci; Francesco C Stingo
Journal:  Stat Methods Appt       Date:  2021-05-27

4.  Rejoinder to statistical contributions to bioinformatics: Design, modelling, structure learning and Integration.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Morris; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  Stat Modelling       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.039

5.  Associations between sexual habits, menstrual hygiene practices, demographics and the vaginal microbiome as revealed by Bayesian network analysis.

Authors:  Noelle Noyes; Kyu-Chul Cho; Jacques Ravel; Larry J Forney; Zaid Abdo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  NExUS: Bayesian simultaneous network estimation across unequal sample sizes.

Authors:  Priyam Das; Christine B Peterson; Kim-Anh Do; Rehan Akbani; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.