| Literature DB >> 28437478 |
Saurabh Sudha Dhiman1, Xin Zhao2, Jinglin Li1, Dongwook Kim3, Vipin C Kalia4, In-Won Kim1, Jae Young Kim2, Jung-Kul Lee1.
Abstract
Accumulation of metal contaminants in soil as a result of various industrial and anthropogenic activities has reduced soil fertility significantly. Phytoextraction of metal contaminants can improve soil fertility and provide inexpensive feedstock for biorefineries. We investigated the hyperaccumulation capacity of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) biomass by cultivating these plants in various concentrations of metal contaminants. Sunflowers were grown in soils contaminated with various levels of heavy metals (10-2,000 mg/kg dry soil). The degree of metal uptake by different parts of the biomass and the residual concentration in the soil were estimated through inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. An almost 2.5-fold hyperaccumulation of Zn2+ was observed in the leaf and flower biomass compared with the concentration in the soil. For the subsequent saccharification of biomass with hyperaccumulated contaminants, a fungal lignocellulosic consortium was used. The fungal consortium cocktail retained more than 95% filter paper activity with 100 mM Ni2+ ions even after 36 h. The highest saccharification yield (SY, 87.4%) was observed with Ni2+ as the contaminant (10 mg/kg dry wt), whereas Pb2+ (251.9 mg/kg dry wt) was the strongest inhibitor of biomass hydrolysis, resulting in only a 30% SY. Importantly, the enzyme cocktail produced by the fungal consortium resulted in almost the same SY (%) as that obtained from a combination of commercial cellulase and β-glucosidase. Significant sugar conversion (61.7%) from H. annuus biomass hydrolysate occurred, resulting in the production of 11.4 g/L of bioethanol. This is the first study to assess the suitability of phytoremediated sunflower biomass for bioethanol production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28437478 PMCID: PMC5402931 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175845
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Saccharification yield obtained with hyperaccumulated biomass.
| Metal | Metal (soil) | Biomass | Metal (biomass) | Saccharification yield (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/kg-soil | component | mg/kg-biomass | FC | FC+188 | CC | CC+188 | |
| Ni | 10 | Stem | 0.5±0.1 | 87.4±5.6 | 87.2±7.7 | 76.4±6.6 | 82.5±7.7 |
| L + F | 3.1±0.3 | 87.1±4.4 | 86.4±6.6 | 79.8±6.5 | 85.6±7.2 | ||
| 50 | Stem | 2.5±0.1 | 86.4±5.6 | 85.2±8.1 | 75.9±6.3 | 83.5±7.3 | |
| L + F | 13.9±1.2 | 84.7±6.6 | 82.6±7.1 | 78.5±6.1 | 82.4±7.3 | ||
| 100 | Stem | 15.6±1.1 | 84.2±7.1 | 82.5±6.6 | 72.5±6.8 | 79.8±7.1 | |
| L + F | 99.1±8.8 | 80.3±7.2 | 74.9±6.3 | 72.4±6.3 | 75.7±7.3 | ||
| As | 10 | Stem | N.D. | 84.7±6.6 | 85.2±8.1 | 76.2±6.1 | 82.6±8.1 |
| L + F | N.D. | 86.2±7.7 | 86.8±6.3 | 74.9±6.6 | 84.5±8.3 | ||
| 50 | Stem | N.D. | 84.7±7.3 | 86.4±8.2 | 73.5±6.7 | 82.1±8.4 | |
| L + F | 10.2±0.9 | 84.5±7.6 | 83.2±7.4 | 72.6±5.8 | 79.2±7.2 | ||
| 100 | Stem | 44.1±2.2 | 81.2±7.2 | 79.6±6.3 | 72.6±5.8 | 78.6±7.5 | |
| L + F | 43.9±3.4 | 81.7±6.5 | 77.6±6.8 | 72.4±7.1 | 77.9±7.1 | ||
| Cd | 50 | Stem | 40.3±3.8 | 84.2±7.9 | 78.4±7.2 | 71.6±7.2 | 79.5±7.4 |
| L + F | 98.1±7.7 | 69.4±5.4 | 62.9±5.1 | 56.7±4.5 | 61.2±5.5 | ||
| 100 | Stem | 78.4±6.6 | 63.3±3.3 | 76.5±7.2 | 61.8±5.8 | 68.2±6.1 | |
| L + F | 161±14 | 43.6±4.1 | 36.4±2.8 | 32.5±2.2 | 34.6±2.2 | ||
| Zn | 200 | Stem | 128±12 | 82.1±6.6 | 78.1±6.4 | 69.5±5.5 | 72.4±6.3 |
| L + F | 269±23 | 65.1±5.5 | 55.3±4.6 | 49.7±4.2 | 50.6±4.8 | ||
| 300 | Stem | 443±33 | 42.9±3.3 | 29.5±1.1 | 33.4±3.3 | 34.1±4.1 | |
| L + F | 808±45 | 27.3±1.1 | 13.3±1.1 | 16.9±1.1 | 17.2±2.1 | ||
| Cu | 300 | Stem | 14.2±1.1 | 81.9±3.3 | 80.1±7.5 | 70.3±6.8 | 77.6±6.8 |
| L + F | 43.4±2.2 | 76.7±6.6 | 73.2±6.3 | 62.9±5.8 | 70.6±6.9 | ||
| 450 | Stem | 10.3±0.9 | 70.9±5.5 | 69.8±5.8 | 61.3±5.9 | 67.5±6.2 | |
| L + F | 75.3±5.5 | 66.3±6.6 | 60.2±5.9 | 55.6±4.2 | 62.5±6.1 | ||
| Pb | 250 | Stem | 29.1±2.1 | 77.7±6.5 | 76.8±6.7 | 68.4±6.3 | 72.6±5.8 |
| L + F | 26.3±1.1 | 80.0±7.1 | 79.2±7.1 | 66.5±6.1 | 75.8±6.3 | ||
| 1000 | Stem | 136±24 | 38.7±3.3 | 29.6±2.1 | 29.4±1.2 | 31.2±2.2 | |
| L + F | 63.2±6.6 | 54.5±4.4 | 47.8±5.3 | 43.6±3.3 | 48.6±3.3 | ||
| 2000 | Stem | 252±29 | 29.6±1.6 | 18.4±1.3 | 17.6±1.2 | 18.3±1.1 | |
| L + F | 149±22 | 36.8±3.3 | 30.5±2.8 | 22.5±2.1 | 25.1±2.2 | ||
| Control | Stem | — | 87.2±6.5 | 87.4±7.4 | 83.6±8.5 | 88.1±7.8 | |
| L + F | — | 82.3±6.6 | 82.9±7.2 | 81.7±7.4 | 83.3±7.9 | ||
*leaf and flower contents were mixed
aenzyme cocktail of fungal consortium
bfungal consortium with Novozyme BGL
ccommercial cellulase
dcommercial cellulase with Novozyme BGL
Saccharification experiments were conducted at 35°C, pH 5.0, RPM 200 and with an enzyme dose of 10 mg protein/g-biomass
Fig 1Optimization of the operational parameters for efficient detoxification* of pretreated sunflower biomass using TcLac.
(a) Temperature, (b) enzyme dose, and (c) incubation time. *The detoxification process was optimized using stems in the biomass.
Concentrations of various metal contaminants present in the biomass before and after pretreatment.
| Biomass | Metal contaminants (mg/metal-kg) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Pb | Zn | Ni | As | Cu | |
| Metal contaminants before pretreatment (mg/kg-biomass) | ||||||
| Root | 3.21±0.31 | 17.2±1.5 | 54.0±6.7 | 1.93±0.31 | ND | 20.8±8.3 |
| Stem | 2.46±0.61 | 7.01±2.32 | 40.1±9.6 | ND | ND | 7.26±1.67 |
| Leaf | 4.84±0.42 | 29.1±5.9 | 53.1±4.1 | ND | ND | 15.0±3.4 |
| Flower & seed | 3.57±0.33 | 10.0±3.8 | 45.0±4.9 | 0.22±0.02 | ND | 17.0±3.6 |
| Metal contaminants after pretreatment (mg/kg-biomass) | ||||||
| Root | 2.94±0.52 | 16.3±2.3 | 53.1±6.7 | 1.77±0.83 | ND | 18.4±1.3 |
| Stem | 2.19±0.29 | 6.88±0.69 | 39.6±4.5 | ND | ND | 6.63±0.85 |
| Leaf | 4.03±0.66 | 27.7±3.6 | 51.8±6.4 | ND | ND | 13.8±2.2 |
| Flower & seed | 3.21±0.48 | 9.73±1.12 | 43.7±2.4 | 0.17±0.05 | ND | 15.4±2.4 |
ND: Not determined
Parameters defining the fermentation of saccharification hydrolysates obtained from phytoremediated Helianthus annuus with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
| Kinetic parameters | Hydrolysate media |
|---|---|
| Initial sugar (g/L) | 50.0±5.5 |
| Residual sugar (g/L) | 13.8±2.2 |
| Sugar consumption (%) | 72.4±7.7 |
| Ethanol (g/L) | 11.4±1.3 |
| Ratio of ethanol yield to consumed sugars | 0.31±0.06 |
| Ethanol volumetric productivity (g/L/h) | 0.31±0.05 |
| Efficiency of sugar conversion to ethanol (%) | 61.7±6.6 |
aHydrolysate media made-up of reducing sugars released after enzymatic hydrolysis
bA mixture of 93% dextrose, 5% xylose, and <2% other sugars