| Literature DB >> 28436261 |
Cui-Zhen Liu1, Zhi-Hua Ye2, Jie Ma1, Rong-Quan He1, Hai-Wei Liang1, Zhi-Gang Peng1, Gang Chen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of miR-141-3p in hepatocellular carcinoma has not been verified. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine miR-141-3p expression and its clinical significance in hepatocellular carcinoma and to investigate the functions of its potential targets.Entities:
Keywords: gene functional enrichment analysis; hepatocellular carcinoma; miR-141-3p; qRT-PCR; target genes
Year: 2017 PMID: 28436261 PMCID: PMC5762039 DOI: 10.1177/1533034617705056
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1533-0338
Figure 1.MiR-141-3p expression in HCC tissues and nontumor liver tissues. A, A comparison of miR-141-3p levels in 49 HCC tissues and 49 nontumor tissues in the TCGA database. P = .045. The expression level of miR-141-3p in TCGA data was normalized using a logarithm. B, A comparison of miR-141-3p levels in 95 pairs of HCC tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues using qRT-PCR. P < .001. HCC indicates hepatocellular carcinoma; qRT-PCR, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.
Figure 2.Diagnostic value of miR-141-3p in HCC. A, The ROC curve of miR-141-3p expression was used to assess its diagnostic value in HCC based on TCGA data. AUC = 0.677 (95% CI: 0.571-0.784, P = .003). B, The ROC curve of miR-141-3p expression by qRT-PCR was used to assess its diagnostic value in HCC. AUC = 0.647 (95% CI: 0.570-0.724, P < .001). AUC, area under the curve; HCC indicates hepatocellular carcinoma; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; qRT-PCR, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Expression of miR-141-3p and Clinicopathological Parameters in HCC in TCGA.
| Clinicopathological Features | n | miR-141-3p Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) |
|
| ||
| Tissue (unmatched) | ||||
| Adjacent noncancerous liver | 50 | 5.3757 (1.4960) | 1.930 | .054 |
| HCC | 352 | 4.7907 (2.0666) | ||
| Tissue (matched) | ||||
| Adjacent noncancerous liver | 49a | 5.3053 (1.4254) | 2.055 | .045 |
| HCC | 49 | 4.6112 (1.7096) | ||
| Age | ||||
| <60 | 162 | 5.1872 (2.3316) | 3.285 | .001 |
| ≥60 | 189 | 4.4542 (1.7512) | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 239 | 4.5736 (1.8064) | 2.595 | .01 |
| Female | 113 | 5.2501 (2.4773) | ||
| AJCC pathologic T | ||||
| T1 | 174 | 4.4813 (1.4985) | 2.783 | .006 |
| T2-T4 | 175 | 5.0924 (2.4852) | ||
| AJCC pathologic N | ||||
| N0 | 240 | 4.7649 (2.1709) |
| .798 |
| N1 | 3 | 4.0876 (1.1607) | ||
| NX | 108 | 4.8438 (1.8377) | ||
| AJCC pathologic M | ||||
| M0 | 255 | 4.8445 (2.2025) |
| .730 |
| M1 | 4 | 4.7268 (1.4122) | ||
| MX | 93 | 4.6460 (1.6752) | ||
| Grade | ||||
| I-II | 219 | 4.5681 (1.7138) | 2.596 | .01 |
| III-IV | 129 | 5.2140 (2.5009) | ||
| Cirrhosis | ||||
| − | 328 | 4.7979 (2.0554) | 0.426 | .671 |
| + | 6 | 5.1569 (1.4361) | ||
| Pathologic stage | ||||
| I-II | 245 | 4.6830 (1.8876) | 1.611 | .108 |
| III-IV | 82 | 5.1040 (2.4698) | ||
| Vaso-invasion | ||||
| − | 195 | 4.6092 (1.8703) | 1.760 | .08 |
| + | 105 | 5.0549 (2.4153) | ||
Abbreviations: AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; SD, standard deviation; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.
aOnly 49 pairs were achieved for HCC tissues and corresponding matched adjacent noncancerous liver tissues because of missing data of miR-141-3p expression in a HCC tissue.
bOne-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) analysis was performed.
Figure 3.The forest plots of the meta-analysis of miR-141-3p expression in HCC using the GEO database. Seven studies were included in the GEO database, and the pooled SMD was −0.006 (95% CI: −0.580 to 0.569, P = .984) with the random-effects model. CI indicates confidence interval; GEO, Gene Expression Omnibus; HCC hepatocellular carcinoma; SMD, standard mean difference.
Expression of miR-141-3p and Clinicopathological Parameters in HCC in the 95 Pairs Detected by qRT-PCR.
| Clinicopathological Features | n | miR-141 Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) |
|
| ||
| Tissue | ||||
| Adjacent noncancerous liver | 95 | 2.5562 (1.7913) | 3.581 | .001 |
| HCC | 95 | 1.7542 (0.8663) | ||
| Age | ||||
| ≥50 | 46 | 1.6280 (0.8034) | 1.382 | .170 |
| <50 | 49 | 1.8727 (0.9137) | ||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 75 | 1.6464 (0.7846) | 2.039 | .052 |
| Female | 20 | 2.1585 (1.0474) | ||
| Differentiation | ||||
| High | 6 | 1.4333 (0.3882) | 0.541a | .584 |
| Moderate | 60 | 1.7463 (0.7897) | ||
| Low | 29 | 1.8369 (1.0720) | ||
| Size | ||||
| <5 cm | 18 | 1.6644 (0.8901) | 0.486 | .628 |
| ≥5 cm | 77 | 1.7752 (0.8652) | ||
| Tumor nodes | ||||
| Single | 52 | 1.9813 (0.8509) | 2.921 | .004 |
| Multiple | 43 | 1.4795 (0.8120) | ||
| Metastasis | ||||
| Without metastasis | 46 | 2.0898 (0.8873) | 3.904 | <.001 |
| With metastasis | 49 | 1.4392 (0.7227) | ||
| TNM stage | ||||
| I-II | 22 | 2.1650 (0.8978) | 2.615 | .01 |
| III-IV | 73 | 1.6304 (0.8231) | ||
| Portal vein tumor embolus | ||||
| − | 63 | 1.8779 (0.8268) | 1.984 | .05 |
| + | 32 | 1.5106 (0.9033) | ||
| Vaso-invasion | ||||
| − | 59 | 1.8673 (0.8462) | 1.643 | .104 |
| + | 36 | 1.5689 (0.8786) | ||
| Cirrhosis | ||||
| − | 45 | 1.6873 (0.8515) | 0.712 | .478 |
| + | 50 | 1.8144 (0.8836) | ||
Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; qRT-PCR; real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction; SD, standard deviation.
aOne-way ANOVA analysis was performed.
Figure 4.MiR-141-3p expression detected by qRT-PCR in various clinicopathological states of HCC. A, Tumor nodes. B, Metastasis. C, TNM stage. HCC indicates hepatocellular carcinoma; qRT-PCR, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Figure 5.The flowchart of the gene functional enrichment.
Figure 6.The correlation between miR-141-3p and 3 identified targets. A, CES2 (r = −.462, P < .001). B, MYRIP (r = −.438, P < .001). C, PEBP1 (r = −.417, P < .001). CES2, carboxylesterase 2; MYRIP, myosin VIIA and Rab interacting protein; PEBP1, phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1.
Figure 7.The correlation between miR-141-3p and 4 identified targets. A, BCKDHB (r = −.313, P < .001). B, PPARA (r = −.312, P < .001). C, GLYATL1 (r = −.312, P < .001). D, IRS2 (r = −.306, P < .001). BCKDHB, branched chain keto acid dehydrogenase E1 subunit beta; PPARA, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha; GLYATL1, glycine-N-acyltransferase like 1; IRS2, insulin receptor substrate 2.
The GO Analysis of the Overlap Between Predicted Target Genes, Validated Targets of miR-141-3p, and NLP.a
| GO ID | Term | Count |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biological process | ||||
| 0042127 | Regulation of cell proliferation | 61 | 8.65E-21 | |
| 0008284 | Positive regulation of cell proliferation | 40 | 1.16E-16 | |
| 0007167 | Enzyme-linked receptor protein signaling pathway | 35 | 2.95E-15 | |
| 0007169 | Transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase signaling pathway | 27 | 1.81E-13 | |
| 0010033 | Response to organic substance | 46 | 2.02E-12 | |
| Cellular component | ||||
| 0031974 | Membrane-enclosed lumen | 62 | 5.31E-07 | |
| 0043233 | Organelle lumen | 61 | 6.16E-07 | |
| 0005654 | Nucleoplasm | 35 | 1.21E-05 | |
| 0031981 | Nuclear lumen | 48 | 2.24E-05 | |
| 0070013 | Intracellular organelle lumen | 55 | 3.06E-05 | |
| Molecular function | ||||
| 0004714 | Transmembrane receptor protein tyrosine kinase activity | 13 | 6.38E-06 | |
| 0004713 | Protein tyrosine kinase activity | 18 | 2.12E-05 | |
| 0004672 | Protein kinase activity | 32 | 3.55E-05 | |
| 0019899 | Enzyme binding | 29 | 3.82E-05 | |
| 0005021 | Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor activity | 5 | 6.26E-05 |
Abbreviations: GO, gene ontology; NLP, natural language processing.
aIn the GO analysis of the overlap between NLP and predicted target genes of miR-141-3p, there were 489 available biological processes, 33 cellular components, and 59 molecular functions (P < .05). In this table, the first 5 terms of the GO analysis were shown.
Figure 8.The BINGO analysis network: BP. Each node represents a biological process. A larger node means that more genes are participating in the process. All colored nodes indicate statistical significance (P < .05). The deeper color indicates a smaller P value for the biological process. White-colored nodes were used to connect the biological processes without statistical significance. In this figure, the terms with a P < 1.0E-09 are presented for better visualization. BP indicates biological processes. BINGO, Biological Networks Gene Ontology.
Figure 9.The BINGO analysis network: CC. Each node represents a biological process. A larger node means that more genes are participating in the process. All colored nodes indicate statistical significance (P < .05). The deeper color indicates a smaller P value for the biological process. White-colored nodes were used to connect the biological processes without statistical significance. CC indicates cellular components. BINGO, Biological Networks Gene Ontology.
Figure 10.The BINGO analysis network: MF. Each node represents a biological process. A larger node means that more genes are participating in the process. All colored nodes indicate statistical significance (P < .05). The deeper color indicates a smaller P value for the biological process. White-colored nodes were used to connect the biological processes without statistical significance. MF indicates molecular functions. BINGO, Biological Networks Gene Ontology.
Figure 11.Protein–protein interaction of the overlapping genes between the predicted target genes of miR-141-3p and the NLP analysis. The protein-to-protein network analysis of the 178 overlapping genes of the predicted targets of miR-141-3p and the NLP analysis was performed using the STRING website. The nodes represent proteins, and each color corresponds to a cluster. The edges indicate the predicted functional associations, which are colored according to the types of predicted associations using different sets of evidence. The red, green, blue, purple, yellow, light blue, and black lines indicate fusion evidence, neighborhood evidence, co-occurrence evidence, experimental evidence, text-mining evidence, database evidence, and coexpression evidence, respectively. The line thickness indicates the strength of the evidence. NLP indicates natural language processing. STRING, search tool for recurring instances of neighbouring genes.
Pathway Analysis of the Overlap of NLP Analysis, Predicted Target Genes, and Validated Targets of miR-141-3p in KEGG.a
| Title | Count |
| Genes |
|---|---|---|---|
| hsa05200: Pathways in cancer | 38 | 1.45E-12 | FGFR1, E2F3, PTGS2, XIAP, GRB2, PDGFA, NFKBIA, KITLG, GLI2, PTEN, TGFB2, CCNE2, KRAS, ITGAV, AXIN1, EGFR, PRKCA, RET, CTBP2, RALBP1, MSH2, CBL, TGFBR2, CYCS, CDK6, SMAD2, HGF, CTNNA1, CDK2, MAPK1, CRKL, CDKN1B, HDAC2, ITGA6, PDGFRA, MAPK9, PDGFRB, PTCH1 |
| hsa05220: Chronic myeloid leukemia | 14 | 3.41E-07 | E2F3, CTBP2, GRB2, CBL, TGFBR2, NFKBIA, CDK6, PTPN11, TGFB2, MAPK1, CRKL, HDAC2, CDKN1B, KRAS |
| hsa05215: Prostate cancer | 15 | 4.12E-07 | EGFR, FGFR1, E2F3, PDGFA, GRB2, CREB1, NFKBIA, PTEN, CDK2, CCNE2, MAPK1, CDKN1B, KRAS, PDGFRA, PDGFRB |
| hsa04115: p53 signaling pathway | 12 | 5.74E-06 | E2F1, FGF19, MAPK1, E2F3, BRAF, CDK6, CDK4, FGF2, PTEN, AKT2 |
| hsa05210: Colorectal cancer | 13 | 8.14E-06 | E2F1, CDC42, MAPK1, E2F3, BRAF, RAC1, CDK6, CDK4, FIGF, AKT2 |
| hsa04510: Focal adhesion | 20 | 1.06E-05 | PRKCA, E2F1, MAPK1, E2F3, BRAF, CDK6, CDK4, PTEN, AKT2 |
| hsa04012: ErbB signaling pathway | 13 | 1.18E-05 | PRKCA, CDC42, MAPK1, CAV1, FLT1, BRAF, XIAP, CCND2, BCL2, ITGAV, RAC1, FIGF, PTEN, FN1, AKT2 |
| hsa05214: Glioma | 11 | 1.85E-05 | E2F1, E2F3, XIAP, BCL2, ITGAV, CDK6, CDK4, PTEN, FN1, AKT2 |
| hsa04010: MAPK signaling pathway | 23 | 1.88E-05 | PRKCA, E2F1, MAPK1, E2F3, BRAF, CDK6, CDK4, AKT2 |
| hsa04110: Cell cycle | 15 | 2.52E-05 | E2F1, MAPK1, E2F3, BRAF, CDK4, FIGF, MMP2 |
Abbreviations: KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; MAPK1, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1; NLP, natural language processing.
aThe pathway analysis was performed in KEGG database, and there were 39 available pathways. Among them, 34 signaling pathways were significant (P < .05), and the top 10 pathways are shown in this table.
Pathway Analysis of the Overlap of NLP Analysis, Predicted Target Genes, and Validated Targets of miR-141-3p in Panther.a
| Title | Count |
| Genes |
|---|---|---|---|
| P00005: Angiogenesis | 23 | 2.60E-05 | PRKCA, FGFR1, PDGFA, GRB2, MAP2K4, JAG1, SRC, EPHB1, PTPN11, KDR, NOTCH2, MAPK1, STAT4, EPHA7, CRKL, KRAS, MAPK14, ARHGAP1, PDGFRA, MAPK9, PDGFRB, FRS2, AXIN1 |
| P00059: p53 pathway | 14 | 6.00E-04 | E2F3, CCNG1, CDC25C, PTEN, SIRT1, ATM, CDK2, CDC25A, CCNE2, YWHAG, HDAC2, TNFRSF10B, SERPINE1, THBS1 |
| P00018: EGF receptor signaling pathway | 15 | 8.93E-04 | PRKCA, EGFR, ERBB4, GRB2, CBL, MAP2K4, ATM, MAPK1, YWHAG, STAT4, KRAS, MAPK14, MAPK9, PEBP1, MAP2K7 |
| P00048: PI3 kinase pathway | 13 | 0.001374803 | IRS2, FOXA2, GNAI1, FOXJ1, GRB2, FOXO3, PTEN, FOXP1, YWHAG, KRAS, CCND2, FOXC1, INSR |
| P00021: FGF signaling pathway | 13 | 0.00503131 | PRKCA, FGFR1, GRB2, MAP2K4, PTPN11, MAPK1, YWHAG, KRAS, MAPK14, MAPK9, PEBP1, MAP2K7, FRS2 |
| P04393: Ras pathway | 10 | 0.007341781 | MAPK1, RPS6KA3, STAT4, KRAS, TIAM1, GRB2, MAPK14, MAP2K4, MAPK9, MAP2K7 |
| P00032: Insulin/IGF pathway-mitogen-activated protein kinase/MAP kinase cascade | 7 | 0.008789569 | MAPK1, RPS6KA3, IRS2, GRB2, MAP2K4, MAP2K7, INSR |
| P04398: p53 pathway feedback loops 2 | 8 | 0.009289086 | CCNE2, E2F3, KRAS, MAPK14, CCNG1, PTEN, ATM, CDK2 |
| P00006: Apoptosis signaling pathway | 11 | 0.026283102 | PRKCA, ATF6, MAPK1, TNFRSF10B, XIAP, CREB1, CYCS, MAP2K4, NFKBIA, MAPK9, MAP2K7 |
| P00052: TGF-β signaling pathway | 12 | 0.033037544 | MAPK1, KRAS, FOXA2, FOXJ1, MAPK14, TGFBR2, MAPK9, SMAD2, FOXC1, FOXO3, FOXP1, TGFB2 |
Abbreviations: EGF, epidermal growth factor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; IGF, insulin-like growth factor; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; NLP, natural language processing; TGF, transforming growth factor.
aThis pathway analysis was performed in Panther database, and there were 16 available pathways. Among them, 13 signaling pathways were significant (P < .05), and the top 10 pathways are shown in this table.