Literature DB >> 28436072

Real-time individualization of the unified model of performance.

Jianbo Liu1, Sridhar Ramakrishnan1, Srinivas Laxminarayan1, Thomas J Balkin2, Jaques Reifman1.   

Abstract

Existing mathematical models for predicting neurobehavioural performance are not suited for mobile computing platforms because they cannot adapt model parameters automatically in real time to reflect individual differences in the effects of sleep loss. We used an extended Kalman filter to develop a computationally efficient algorithm that continually adapts the parameters of the recently developed Unified Model of Performance (UMP) to an individual. The algorithm accomplishes this in real time as new performance data for the individual become available. We assessed the algorithm's performance by simulating real-time model individualization for 18 subjects subjected to 64 h of total sleep deprivation (TSD) and 7 days of chronic sleep restriction (CSR) with 3 h of time in bed per night, using psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) data collected every 2 h during wakefulness. This UMP individualization process produced parameter estimates that progressively approached the solution produced by a post-hoc fitting of model parameters using all data. The minimum number of PVT measurements needed to individualize the model parameters depended upon the type of sleep-loss challenge, with ~30 required for TSD and ~70 for CSR. However, model individualization depended upon the overall duration of data collection, yielding increasingly accurate model parameters with greater number of days. Interestingly, reducing the PVT sampling frequency by a factor of two did not notably hamper model individualization. The proposed algorithm facilitates real-time learning of an individual's trait-like responses to sleep loss and enables the development of individualized performance prediction models for use in a mobile computing platform.
© 2017 European Sleep Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian learning; individualized modelling; performance prediction; recursive parameter estimation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28436072     DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sleep Res        ISSN: 0962-1105            Impact factor:   3.981


  4 in total

1.  Fatigue risk management based on self-reported fatigue: Expanding a biomathematical model of fatigue-related performance deficits to also predict subjective sleepiness.

Authors:  Mark E McCauley; Peter McCauley; Samantha M Riedy; Siobhan Banks; Adrian J Ecker; Leonid V Kalachev; Suresh Rangan; David F Dinges; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2021-05-12

2.  Classifying attentional vulnerability to total sleep deprivation using baseline features of Psychomotor Vigilance Test performance.

Authors:  Eric Chern-Pin Chua; Jason P Sullivan; Jeanne F Duffy; Elizabeth B Klerman; Steven W Lockley; Bruce S Kristal; Charles A Czeisler; Joshua J Gooley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Prediction of shiftworker alertness, sleep, and circadian phase using a model of arousal dynamics constrained by shift schedules and light exposure.

Authors:  Stuart A Knock; Michelle Magee; Julia E Stone; Saranea Ganesan; Megan D Mulhall; Steven W Lockley; Mark E Howard; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Tracey L Sletten; Svetlana Postnova
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Changes in performance and bio-mathematical model performance predictions during 45 days of sleep restriction in a simulated space mission.

Authors:  Erin E Flynn-Evans; Crystal Kirkley; Millennia Young; Nicholas Bathurst; Kevin Gregory; Verena Vogelpohl; Albert End; Steven Hillenius; Yvonne Pecena; Jessica J Marquez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.