| Literature DB >> 28435601 |
K Khatri1, V Sharma2, D Lakhotia3, R Bhalla4, K Farooque1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report functional outcome in Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) tibial avulsion fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation through Burks and Schaffer approach. The patient specific functional outcome measures like IKDC grading together with objective grading with stress radiographs have rarely been used -to assess PCL tibial avulsion fractures.Entities:
Keywords: Joint instability; functional outcome; posterior cruciate ligament; rehabilitation
Year: 2015 PMID: 28435601 PMCID: PMC5333651 DOI: 10.5704/MOJ.1507.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malays Orthop J ISSN: 1985-2533
Patient characteristics
| Age (in years) | 35.88±11.15 |
| Gender (male: female) | 21:6 |
| Mechanism of injury | 23:3:1 |
| (MVA: fall : sports injury) | |
| Side involved (right : left) | 20:7 |
Fig. 1Image showing fixation of posterior cruciate bony avulsion injury with partially threaded cannulated cancellous screws.
Fig. 2Flouroscopic image showing acceptable reduction of the avulsed posterior cruciate bony fragment.
Fig. 3Patient postioning in stress radiography (active hamstring contraction test).
Fig. 4Stress radiograph to asses the posterior translation of the tibial plateau: a line is drawn tangent to the medial tibial plateau. Next a line is drawn prependicular to the tangent to the medial tibial plateau and passing through the posterior edge of medial tibial plateau. Subsequently, another line is drawn passing throught the posterior aspect of medial femoral condyle. The posterior translation is then calculated by measuring the distance between the two prependiculars drawn.
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores for the 27 patients
| Parameter | Normal (Grade A) | Near normal (Grade B) | Abnormal (Grade C) | Severely abnormal (Grade D) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjective measure | 21 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| Symptoms | 19 | 6 | 2 | 0 |
| Range of motion | 24 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Crepitus | 23 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Ligament laxity | 20 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Radiography | 21 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Functional testing | 20 | 5 | 2 | 0 |
| Final evaluation | 20 | 5 | 2 | 0 |