Literature DB >> 28854767

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Isolated Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures: Clinical and Functional Outcome.

Sachin Joshi1, Chirag Bhatia1,2, Ashwin Gondane1, Avinash Rai1, Sumer Singh1,3, Shobhit Gupta1.   

Abstract

Purpose: The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) presents commonly with avulsion fractures of its tibial attachment. An avulsion fracture of the PCL, if not surgically fixed, may lead to secondary changes in the knee joint. Various fixation techniques have been explored with use of lag screws, steel wires, absorbable screws, suture anchors and straddle nails. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome of open reduction and internal fixation of tibial avulsion injuries of the PCL using cannulated cancellous screws. Materials and
Methods: We performed open reduction and internal fixation using cannulated cancellous screws in 14 patients (mean age, 33.9 years) with isolated PCL avulsion injuries. Patients with a duration of injury more than 12 weeks were excluded. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Results were assessed radiologically and clinically. Final functional outcome was assessed using the Lysholm knee scoring system.
Results: The average follow-up period was 13.5 months. At the final follow-up, all 14 patients achieved fracture union. The average flexion was 121.7°±9.2° with full extension achieved in all patients. Mild instability (1+) was noted in 4 patients. The Lysholm functional score was excellent in 11 patients, good in 2 patients and fair in 1 patient with an average score of 97±7.6. Conclusions: Stable early fixation for PCL avulsion injuries with early controlled mobilization provided excellent to good results. However, fixation should not be discouraged for late-presenting patients because good to fair results can be achieved in such cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avulsion; Fixation; Fraucture; Knee; Posterior cruciate ligament

Year:  2017        PMID: 28854767      PMCID: PMC5596399          DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.17.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res        ISSN: 2234-0726


Introduction

Isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries are uncommon and often go undiagnosed in acutely injured knees1). The PCL, being a strong ligament, presents more commonly with avulsion fractures of its tibial attachment2) unlike the anterior cruciate ligament whose tears commonly present as isolated lesions. Avulsion injuries differ from other PCL injuries in that they are easily diagnosed on standard radiographs where a bony fragment may be visible. Traditionally, surgery of PCL injuries was deferred due to an apprehension that the approach to the posterior part of the knee is difficult3). However, surgical fixation of avulsion injuries is recommended to avoid morbidity associated with nonunion of the fracture4). Repair of avulsion injuries can be done with an open or arthroscopic technique. Biomechanical studies have also demonstrated comparable results of screw fixation using open or arthroscopic means5). However, arthroscopic repair is technically more challenging, requires specialized equipment and has a long learning curve. Thus, it unsuitable to perform in primary centers. Open reduction and internal fixation using screws has been considered a favorable method to manage PCL avulsion injuries producing satisfactory results6–10). In addition, a simplified posteromedial approach described by Burks and Schaffer11), which is useful for avoiding difficulties associated with previous posterior approaches to the knee, has become the standard approach to the PCL. There is currently a wide variety of materials available for internal fixation, including lag screws, steel wires, absorbable screws, suture anchors and straddle nails12,13). Fixation with screws has shown favorable results; however, no one technique has been considered a gold standard for avulsion fractures of the PCL. In this study, we present our experience with fixation using cannulated cancellous screws, which is a good implant to achieve compression needed to fix avulsion fractures and is easily available. The approach we used was also simple and helpful in avoiding the neurovascular bundles unlike other posterior approaches. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of tibial avulsion injuries of the PCL using cannulated cancellous screws. We hypothesized that the technique would provide improved clinical and functional outcome with use of an easily available implant and a simple approach.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-one patients with PCL avulsion fractures were enrolled for the study from December, 2012 to November, 2015. Patients aged between 18 and 60 years with a duration of injury less than 12 weeks were included in the study. Patients with any other associated ligament injury of the same joint, any other bony injury of the same limb or any medical comorbidity precluding the surgery were excluded from the study. Patients in whom the avulsed fragment was too small (<20 mm2) to be fixed using a screw were also excluded. After excluding 7 patients based on the above criteria, 14 patients having isolated PCL avulsion fracture were ultimately included in the study. All patients underwent thorough clinical examination. All the cases were clinically assessed by the senior author using the drawer test to confirm PCL injury. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs including the posterior stress view (Fig. 1) of the knee were taken to confirm the injury. A computed tomography scan (Fig. 2) was done for patients in whom the injury could not be defined well on radiographs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Fig. 3) was done for every patient in order to confirm associated ligament injuries of the knee.
Fig. 1

Lateral radiograph of the knee (non-stress view) showing the avulsed fragment from the tibia (case no. 3).

Fig. 2

Three-dimensional computed tomography scan showing the avulsed fragment of the tibia (case no. 2).

Fig. 3

Magnetic resonance imaging scan showing a lax posterior cruciate ligament avulsed from its tibial attachment (case no. 2).

After informed consent was obtained, patients were operated using the modified posterior approach described by Burks and Schaffer11). The approach (Fig. 4) uses an inverted ‘L’ incision starting on the medial border of the gastrocnemius and curving along the flexor crease of the joint towards the lateral side. The fascia is incised in the line of skin incision. The capsule is exposed using the interval between the semimembranosus and gastrocnemius, which is then incised longitudinally to expose the joint at the site of the avulsed fragment. The avulsed fragment was debrided if needed and reduced using a clamp. It is of note that the reduction was achieved by slight flexion of the joint. The avulsed fragment was fixed using one or two 4 mm cannulated cancellous screws according to the size of the fragment (Fig. 5). A washer was used when compression was not achieved with the screw alone.
Fig. 4

Intraoperative photograph showing the skin incision and fracture site with the screw insertion technique.

Fig. 5

Lateral radiographs of the knee showing cannulated cancellous screws in situ after fixation of the tibial avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament in case no. 4 (A) and case no.10 (B). Note the different orientation of screws, which was decided according to the orientation of the fracture line.

Postoperatively, the limb was kept immobilized using a long knee brace for 6 weeks. Quadriceps strengthening was started from the 2nd postoperative day. Passive knee bending was started after suture removal (10–12 days after surgery) and active knee mobilization was started 3 weeks after surgery. Partial weight bearing was allowed after 6 weeks and full weight bearing after 12 weeks when the brace was also discarded. Return to heavy activities, such as running and sports, were allowed only after 6–9 months. Patients were regularly followed up every week for a month, then every month for the first 3 months and every 3 months thereafter for a minimum of 12 months. At every follow-up, patients were assessed clinically and radiographically. Outcomes were assessed in terms of stability and range of motion (ROM). Stability was assessed clinically by the drawer test and radiologically by lateral stress X-ray (Fig. 6). Final functional outcome was assessed using the Lysholm knee scoring system.
Fig. 6

Preoperative (A) and postoperative (B) posterior tibial sagging (case no. 3).

Statistical analysis was done using the Wilcoxon nonparametric paired test to determine the significance of postoperative improvement with respect to the Lysholm score as well as joint stability.

Results

Of the 14 patients, 12 were male and 2 were female. The mean age of the patients was 33.9 years, ranging from 22 to 54 years (Table 1). The most common mode of injury was road traffic accident (n=9) with a majority involving motorcycle accident followed by either sports-related injury or fall. Eleven patients presented to the clinic within 3 weeks of injury while three patients presented between 3 to 12 weeks after injury. The average period of follow-up was 13.5 months.
Table 1

Details of the 14 Cases

CaseAge (yr)Mechanism of injuryDuration of injury (day)Follow-up (mo)Lyscholm scoreClinincal outcome (°)Postop instabilityComplication

PreopPostop (functional outcome)
129Motorcycle2150100 (excellent)130Nil-
234Fall1012699 (excellent)110NilSuperficial infection
326Motorcycle412099 (excellent)113Nil-
448Motorcycle313084 (good)110NilResidual pain
527Road traffic116095 (excellent)120Mild (1+)-
639Motorcycle5130100 (excellent)130Nil-
724Sports related812295 (excellent)128Mild (1+)Superficial infection
841Fall46152089 (good)121NilResidual swelling
943Motorcycle712495 (excellent)127Mild (1+)-
1022Sports related28171599 (excellent)110Nil-
1131Motorcycle1140100 (excellent)135Nil-
1229Road traffic213095 (excellent)130Mild (1+)-
1354Fall38121374 (fair)110NilResidual pain
1428Motorcycle5147100 (excellent)130Nil-
Mean33.9---4.894.6121.7--

Preop: preoperative, Postop: postoperative.

At the final follow-up, all 14 patients had achieved fracture union. At 6 weeks after surgery, the ROM was more than 90° in 9 patients. Of the remaining 5 patients, 3 patients who had presented later than 3 weeks after injury regained more than 90° of flexion after more than 6 postoperative weeks. At the final follow-up, the average flexion was 121.7°±9.18° with full extension possible in all the patients. The functional outcome assessed by the Lysholm scoring system was excellent in 11 patients, good in 2 patients and fair in one patient. The average Lysholm score was 97±7.6. Two patients complained of residual pain in the joint while one complained of residual swelling in the joint. Two patients had superficial wound infection, which was treated with intravenous antibiotics and regular dressings. No other complications were observed. Instability tested clinically using the drawer test and radiologically by stress X-ray was found to be mild (1+) in 4 of the patients while the rest of the patients had no residual instability. The statistical analysis showed highly significant improvement (p<0.001) in functional outcome assessed by the Lysholm score and joint stability (p<0.001) (Table 2).
Table 2

Statistical Analysis

ParameterPreoperativePostoperativep-valueInference
Lysholm score3±6.797±7.6<0.001Significant
Instability2.5±0.50.3±0.5<0.001Significant

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

Discussion

PCL injuries account for approximately 20% of total ligament injuries of the knee14). The incidence is especially high in cases of high-energy trauma (motorcycle and car accidents), and athletic population involved in contact sports is especially vulnerable to PCL injuries4,15). The most common mechanism underlying PCL avulsion fractures of the tibia in road traffic accidents is dashboard collision in which a direct force is applied to the proximal part of the tibia in an anterior-to-posterior direction, with the knee in flexion16,17). In our series, most of the injuries resulted from motorcycle accidents because the majority of people commute by two-wheelers in India. Though the necessity of surgical treatment of isolated PCL injuries is still controversial, fixation methods for avulsion fractures of the PCL at the tibial insertion have been suggested in different series18–23). If left untreated, the injury leads to secondary joint changes resulting in osteoarthritis24). Open fixation through the posteromedial approach seems to be a relatively easy procedure that can be performed at any center by any orthopedic surgeon. The posteromedial approach used in our patients was devised by Burks and Schaffer11), which is a simple approach exposing the desired surgical area without having to disturb the neurovascular bundles as with other approaches described by Abbott, Trickey, Ogata, and McCormick3,20,25,26). In this study, we performed open reduction and internal fixation of isolated PCL avulsion injuries using cannulated cancellous screws, assuming to attain good functional and clinical outcome. The most important findings of our study include that excellent to good functional outcome was obtained in the majority of patients (92.9%) and fairly good results were achieved in terms of ROM as well as stability. In our series, we treated 14 patients with isolated PCL avulsion injuries by internal fixation using cannulated cancellous screws and the results were excellent in 78.6%, good in 14.3% and fair in 7.1% of the patients with an average postoperative Lysholm score of 97±7.6. These results were superior to those reported in previous studies. In a study by Attia and Zanfaly27) among 12 patients treated using navicular screws, excellent results were obtained in 33.3%, good results in 58.3% and fair results in 8.3%. Similarly, Piedade and Mischan28) showed excellent results in 53% and good in 47% of their cases where screws or Polyester no. 5 were used to fix the fracture. Khatri et al.29) used the same approach and technique, which resulted in a postoperative Lysholm score of 90.85±5.58. In the present study, all patients attained fair to good ROM with an average flexion of 121.7°±9.2° and full extension. Khatri et al.29) achieved normal to nearly normal ROM in 96% of the patients where as 64.3% of the patients achieved results similar to our study. Postoperative knee flexion was inferior in patients who had presented to the clinic relatively late and who did not adhere to the prescribed physiotherapy. Hence early fixation and strict adherence to physiotherapy are recommended. Four of the patients who had mild (1+) residual instability had an intrasubstance PCL injury determined on MRI. However, this instability did not affect the functional outcome. Bali et al.10) reported that intrasubstance occult injuries were present in 15 out of 42 patients included in their study and 6 of them required a PCL reconstruction at a later stage. By contrast, none of the patients in our study had gross instability that necessitated PCL reconstruction at a later stage. Although the technique we used in this study resulted in significant improvement in functional and clinical outcome, it is difficult to conclude that it should be the go to technique for PCL avulsion fractures due to the small sample size. Further studies with a larger sample size or case-control studies comparing different techniques are necessary to confirm our results. Nevertheless, the significance of this study is that we explored a novel and simple technique and added to the available literature on the management of PCL avulsion fractures.

Conclusions

Avulsion injuries of the PCL, though rare, should not be ignored. These injuries can be easily approached using a modified posterior approach and cancellous screw fixation with early controlled knee mobilization provides excellent to good functional results. Early diagnosis and fixation is preferred; however, fixation should not be discouraged in patients presenting late since comparably good to fair results can be obtained in such cases as well.
  23 in total

1.  Fixation of small tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament using the double bundles pull-through suture method.

Authors:  C H Chen; W J Chen; C H Shih
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-06

Review 2.  Posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee joint.

Authors:  A T Janousek; D G Jones; M Clatworthy; L D Higgins; F H Fu
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Arthroscopic suture fixation for bony avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  S J Kim; S J Shin; S K Cho; H K Kim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries: revisited.

Authors:  William M Wind; John A Bergfeld; Richard D Parker
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Open screw fixation versus arthroscopic suture fixation of tibial posterior cruciate ligament avulsion injuries: a mechanical comparison.

Authors:  Sandra Umeda Sasaki; Roberto Freire da Mota e Albuquerque; Marco Martins Amatuzzi; César Augusto Martins Pereira
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Isolated avulsion fracture of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  T Torisu
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: preliminary report of a new procedure.

Authors:  W C McCormick; R J Bagg; C W Kennedy; C A Leukens
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Management of avulsion injury of the PCL with reattachment.

Authors:  F Y Chiu; J J Wu; H C Hsu; L Lin; W H Lo
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Treatment of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures through a modified open posterior approach: operative technique and 12- to 48-month outcomes.

Authors:  Gregg T Nicandri; Eric O Klineberg; Christopher J Wahl; William J Mills
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  MR imaging of the posterior cruciate ligament: normal, abnormal, and associated injury patterns.

Authors:  A H Sonin; S W Fitzgerald; F L Hoff; H Friedman; M E Bresler
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.333

View more
  10 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures using a locking compression hook plate: A case series.

Authors:  Wei Deng; Yaxing Li; Shizhou Wu; Xi Liu; Fuguo Huang; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.511

2.  Homemade pin-hook for surgical treatment of posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures.

Authors:  Qiang Guo; Xiaoning Li; Yifu Tang; Yuzhao Huang; Ling Luo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 3.  Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures.

Authors:  Anna Katsman; Eric J Strauss; Kirk A Campbell; Michael J Alaia
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

4.  Clinical experience with arthroscopic suture pull technique in isolated PCL avulsion injuries.

Authors:  Ravindra Lamoria; Divyanshu Goyal; Mahesh Bansal; Sanjeev Kaler; Rahul Upadhyay
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-06-27

5.  Isolated Partial Femoral Avulsion Fracture of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Adults.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Qi Gui; Feng Zhao; Xue-Zhen Shen; Yi-Lun Pei
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  IS THE "U-SIGN" RADIOLOGIC FEATURE OF A POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT TIBIAL AVULSION FRACTURE?

Authors:  Sergio Rocha Piedade; Daniel Miranda Ferreira; Mark Hutchinson; Nicola Maffulli; Martha Maria Mischan; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  Case report of concomitant avulsion fractures of the medial meniscus and posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Bertan Cengiz; Sinan Karaoglu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Open reduction and internal fixation of the tibial avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament: which is better, a hollow lag screw combined with a gasket or a homemade hook plate?

Authors:  Hongfei Qi; Yao Lu; Ming Li; Teng Ma; Cheng Ren; Yibo Xu; Qian Wang; Kun Zhang; Zhong Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Arthroscopic Direct Anterior-to-Posterior Suture Suspension Fixation for the Treatment of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Tibial Avulsion Fracture.

Authors:  Tianqi Tao; Wengbo Yang; Xing Tao; Yang Li; Kaibin Zhang; Yiqiu Jiang; Jianchao Gui
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  [Early effectiveness of minimally invasive open reduction and internal fixation versus arthroscopic double-tunnel suture fixation for tibial avulsion fracture of posterior cruciate ligament].

Authors:  Peng Zhou; Juncai Liu; Yangbo Xu; Daiqing Wei; Xiangtian Deng; Zhong Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.