| Literature DB >> 28854767 |
Sachin Joshi1, Chirag Bhatia1,2, Ashwin Gondane1, Avinash Rai1, Sumer Singh1,3, Shobhit Gupta1.
Abstract
Purpose: The posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) presents commonly with avulsion fractures of its tibial attachment. An avulsion fracture of the PCL, if not surgically fixed, may lead to secondary changes in the knee joint. Various fixation techniques have been explored with use of lag screws, steel wires, absorbable screws, suture anchors and straddle nails. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcome of open reduction and internal fixation of tibial avulsion injuries of the PCL using cannulated cancellous screws. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Avulsion; Fixation; Fraucture; Knee; Posterior cruciate ligament
Year: 2017 PMID: 28854767 PMCID: PMC5596399 DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.17.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Relat Res ISSN: 2234-0726
Fig. 1Lateral radiograph of the knee (non-stress view) showing the avulsed fragment from the tibia (case no. 3).
Fig. 2Three-dimensional computed tomography scan showing the avulsed fragment of the tibia (case no. 2).
Fig. 3Magnetic resonance imaging scan showing a lax posterior cruciate ligament avulsed from its tibial attachment (case no. 2).
Fig. 4Intraoperative photograph showing the skin incision and fracture site with the screw insertion technique.
Fig. 5Lateral radiographs of the knee showing cannulated cancellous screws in situ after fixation of the tibial avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament in case no. 4 (A) and case no.10 (B). Note the different orientation of screws, which was decided according to the orientation of the fracture line.
Fig. 6Preoperative (A) and postoperative (B) posterior tibial sagging (case no. 3).
Details of the 14 Cases
| Case | Age (yr) | Mechanism of injury | Duration of injury (day) | Follow-up (mo) | Lyscholm score | Clinincal outcome (°) | Postop instability | Complication | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||
| Preop | Postop (functional outcome) | ||||||||
| 1 | 29 | Motorcycle | 2 | 15 | 0 | 100 (excellent) | 130 | Nil | - |
| 2 | 34 | Fall | 10 | 12 | 6 | 99 (excellent) | 110 | Nil | Superficial infection |
| 3 | 26 | Motorcycle | 4 | 12 | 0 | 99 (excellent) | 113 | Nil | - |
| 4 | 48 | Motorcycle | 3 | 13 | 0 | 84 (good) | 110 | Nil | Residual pain |
| 5 | 27 | Road traffic | 1 | 16 | 0 | 95 (excellent) | 120 | Mild (1+) | - |
| 6 | 39 | Motorcycle | 5 | 13 | 0 | 100 (excellent) | 130 | Nil | - |
| 7 | 24 | Sports related | 8 | 12 | 2 | 95 (excellent) | 128 | Mild (1+) | Superficial infection |
| 8 | 41 | Fall | 46 | 15 | 20 | 89 (good) | 121 | Nil | Residual swelling |
| 9 | 43 | Motorcycle | 7 | 12 | 4 | 95 (excellent) | 127 | Mild (1+) | - |
| 10 | 22 | Sports related | 28 | 17 | 15 | 99 (excellent) | 110 | Nil | - |
| 11 | 31 | Motorcycle | 1 | 14 | 0 | 100 (excellent) | 135 | Nil | - |
| 12 | 29 | Road traffic | 2 | 13 | 0 | 95 (excellent) | 130 | Mild (1+) | - |
| 13 | 54 | Fall | 38 | 12 | 13 | 74 (fair) | 110 | Nil | Residual pain |
| 14 | 28 | Motorcycle | 5 | 14 | 7 | 100 (excellent) | 130 | Nil | - |
| Mean | 33.9 | - | - | - | 4.8 | 94.6 | 121.7 | - | - |
Preop: preoperative, Postop: postoperative.
Statistical Analysis
| Parameter | Preoperative | Postoperative | p-value | Inference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lysholm score | 3±6.7 | 97±7.6 | <0.001 | Significant |
| Instability | 2.5±0.5 | 0.3±0.5 | <0.001 | Significant |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.