Literature DB >> 28434964

Reconstruction of Cranial Vault Defect with Polyetheretherketone Implants.

Pierre Brandicourt1, Franck Delanoé2, Franck-Emmanuel Roux3, Florian Jalbert2, David Brauge3, Frédéric Lauwers2.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Reconstruction of a cranial vault defect is a frequent challenge in neurosurgery. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is used in many types of prostheses and has been employed for 10 years in our institution (University Hospital of Toulouse, France). The objectives of this study are to describe the benefits and drawbacks of reconstructing the cranial vault defect with a PEEK prosthesis.
METHODS: Clinical data of the 37 patients who received a reconstruction with a custom-made PEEK prosthesis from 2007-2015 were retrospectively analysed. Operative technique, postoperative complications, and patient's satisfaction with the aesthetic result-on a scale ranging from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied)-were studied.
RESULTS: Average follow-up was 4.3 years (from 2 months-9 years). The placement of the prosthesis was performed 195 days on average (from 0-1051 days, standard deviation 258 days) after the initial bone flap removal. One infection (2.7%), which required the removal of the prosthesis, was described. Six patients (16%) were reoperated by the maxillofacial surgery team to treat a lack of temporal projection related to muscle atrophy, using a fat cell autograft taken from the abdominal region. Overall, 30 patients (81%) answered the question about their aesthetic satisfaction, with good results on the satisfaction scale (average 4.5; from 3-5).
CONCLUSION: The use of a PEEK prosthesis in cranial vault defect reconstruction is a reliable technique with a high patient satisfaction rate and few complications. Corrections of the temporal muscle atrophy by fat grafting may be performed in addition, without increasing the rate of complications.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranioplasty; Polyetheretherketone; Prosthesis; Reconstruction of the cranial vault

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28434964     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  8 in total

1.  Custom made onlay implants in peek in maxillofacial surgery: a volumetric study.

Authors:  G Saponaro; P Doneddu; G Gasparini; Edoardo Staderini; R Boniello; M Todaro; G D'Amato; S Pelo; A Moro
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future.

Authors:  Haley Meyer; Syed I Khalid; Amir H Dorafshar; Richard W Byrne
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 0.558

Review 3.  Classification, History, and Future Prospects of Maxillofacial Prosthesis.

Authors:  Fernanda Pereira de Caxias; Daniela Micheline Dos Santos; Lisiane Cristina Bannwart; Clovis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto; Marcelo Coelho Goiato
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2019-07-18

4.  Reconstruction for diverse fronto-orbital defects with computer-assisted designed and computer-assisted manufactured PEEK implants in one-stage operation: Case reports.

Authors:  Min Yang; Zhangyi Wu; Hai Yu; Jun Cheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Evaluating patients' satisfaction level after using 3D printed PEEK facial implants in repairing maxillofacial deformities.

Authors:  Ahmad Fayez Ahmad; Hekmat Yaakob; Ali Khalil; Pierre Georges
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-07-06

6.  Early experience with patient-specific low-cost 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty implants in a lower-middle-income-country: Technical note and economic analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Ashraf; Nabeel Choudhary; Usman Ahmad Kamboh; Muhammad Asif Raza; Kashif Ali Sultan; Naseeruddin Ghulam; Syed Shahzad Hussain; Naveed Ashraf
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-06-23

7.  Outcome and risk factors of complications after cranioplasty with polyetheretherketone and titanium mesh: A single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Shun Yao; Qiyu Zhang; Yiying Mai; Hongyi Yang; Yilin Li; Minglin Zhang; Run Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Adaptive Mechanism for Designing a Personalized Cranial Implant and Its 3D Printing Using PEEK.

Authors:  Syed Hammad Mian; Khaja Moiduddin; Sherif Mohammed Elseufy; Hisham Alkhalefah
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.329

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.