Literature DB >> 27297835

Thermal evaluation by infrared measurement of implant site preparation between single and gradual drilling in artificial bone blocks of different densities.

S C Möhlhenrich1, M Abouridouane2, N Heussen3, F Hölzle4, F Klocke2, A Modabber4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of bone density and drilling protocol on heat generation during implant bed preparation. Ten single and 10 gradual implant sites with diameters of 2.8, 3.5, and 4.2mm were prepared in four artificial bone blocks (density types I-IV; D1-D4). Drilling was done at constant speed (1500rpm) and with external irrigation (50ml/min); vertical speed was set at 2mm/s. An infrared camera was used for temperature measurements. Significantly higher temperatures for single drilling were found between 2.8-mm drills in D1 (P=0.0014) and D4 (P<0.0001) and between 3.5-mm drills in D3 (P=0.0087) and D4 (P<0.0001), as well as between 4.2-mm drills in D1 (P<0.0001) and D4 (P=0.0014). Low bone density led to a thermal decrease after single drilling and a thermal increase after gradual drilling. Burs with a large diameter always showed a higher temperature generation. In comparisons between 2.8- and 4.2-mm diameters for both single and gradual drills, significant differences (P<0.001) were noted for bone types II, III, and IV. Single drilling could generate more heat than traditional sequential drilling, and bone density, as well as drill diameter, influenced thermal increases. Particularly in lower-density bone, conventional sequential drilling seems to raise the temperature less.
Copyright © 2016 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone surgery; dental implants; heat generation; implant site preparation; infrared thermography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27297835     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  7 in total

1.  Slow drilling speeds for single-drill implant bed preparation. Experimental in vitro study.

Authors:  R A Delgado-Ruiz; E Velasco Ortega; G E Romanos; S Gerhke; I Newen; J L Calvo-Guirado
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of Maximum Heat Generation during Implant Site Preparation between Single and Gradual Drilling Protocols in Artificial D1 Bone Blocks: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Tammam Koutiech; Omar Ahmad Heshmeh; Kamal Alkerdi; Johnny Toumi; Laith Al Sabek
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-06-18

3.  Comparative Study of Different Drills for Bone Drilling: A Systematic Approach.

Authors:  O Pazarci; Y Torun; A Ozturk; Z Oztemur
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2020-07

4.  Comparative statement for diametric delamination in drilling of cortical bone with conventional and ultrasonic assisted drilling techniques.

Authors:  Gurmeet Singh; Atul Babbar; Vivek Jain; Dheeraj Gupta
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-01

5.  In Vitro Study on Bone Heating during Drilling of the Implant Site: Material, Design and Wear of the Surgical Drill.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Bernabeu-Mira; Hilario Pellicer-Chover; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; David Peñarrocha-Oltra
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Appraising efficiency of OpSite as coolant in drilling of bone.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Effatparvar; Nima Jamshidi; Alireza Mosavar
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Single-drill implant induces bone corticalization during submerged healing: an in vivo pilot study.

Authors:  Paolo Trisi; Antonello Falco; Marco Berardini
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-01-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.