Emilie T Reas1, Gail A Laughlin2, Jaclyn Bergstrom2, Donna Kritz-Silverstein2, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor2, Linda K McEvoy3. 1. Departments of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA. Electronic address: ereas@ucsd.edu. 2. Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA. 3. Departments of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, CA; Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated how cognitive function changes with age and whether rates of decline vary by sex or education in a large, homogenous longitudinal cohort characterized by high participation rates, long duration of follow-up, and minimal loss to follow-up. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Between 1988 and 2016, 2,225 community-dwelling participants of the Rancho Bernardo Study, aged 31 to 99 years at their initial cognitive assessment, completed neuropsychological testing approximately every 4 years, over a maximum 27-year follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Linear mixed effects regression models defined sex-specific cognitive trajectories, adjusting for education and retest effects. RESULTS: Significant decline across all cognitive domains began around age 65 years and accelerated after age 80 years. Patterns of decline were generally similar between sexes, although men declined more rapidly than women on the global function test. Higher education was associated with slower decline on the tests of executive and global functions. After excluding 517 participants with evidence of cognitive impairment, accelerating decline with age remained for all tests, and women declined more rapidly than men on the executive function test. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerating decline with advancing age occurs across multiple cognitive domains in community-dwelling older adults, with few differences in rates of decline between men and women. Higher education may provide some protection against executive and global function decline with age. These findings better characterize normal cognitive aging, a critical prerequisite for identifying individuals at risk for cognitive impairment, and lay the groundwork for future studies of health and behavioral factors that affect age-related decline in this cohort.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated how cognitive function changes with age and whether rates of decline vary by sex or education in a large, homogenous longitudinal cohort characterized by high participation rates, long duration of follow-up, and minimal loss to follow-up. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Between 1988 and 2016, 2,225 community-dwelling participants of the Rancho Bernardo Study, aged 31 to 99 years at their initial cognitive assessment, completed neuropsychological testing approximately every 4 years, over a maximum 27-year follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Linear mixed effects regression models defined sex-specific cognitive trajectories, adjusting for education and retest effects. RESULTS: Significant decline across all cognitive domains began around age 65 years and accelerated after age 80 years. Patterns of decline were generally similar between sexes, although men declined more rapidly than women on the global function test. Higher education was associated with slower decline on the tests of executive and global functions. After excluding 517 participants with evidence of cognitive impairment, accelerating decline with age remained for all tests, and women declined more rapidly than men on the executive function test. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerating decline with advancing age occurs across multiple cognitive domains in community-dwelling older adults, with few differences in rates of decline between men and women. Higher education may provide some protection against executive and global function decline with age. These findings better characterize normal cognitive aging, a critical prerequisite for identifying individuals at risk for cognitive impairment, and lay the groundwork for future studies of health and behavioral factors that affect age-related decline in this cohort.
Authors: Graciela Muniz-Terrera; Fiona Matthews; Tom Dening; Felicia A Huppert; Carol Brayne Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2009-02-28 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Arun S Karlamangla; Dana Miller-Martinez; Carol S Aneshensel; Teresa E Seeman; Richard G Wight; Joshua Chodosh Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Emilie T Reas; Gail A Laughlin; Jaclyn Bergstrom; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Linda K McEvoy Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Else Foverskov; M Maria Glymour; Erik L Mortensen; Anders Holm; Theis Lange; Rikke Lund Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Emilie T Reas; Gail A Laughlin; Jaclyn Bergstrom; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Linda K McEvoy Journal: Neuropsychology Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Edward H Ip; Shyh-Huei Chen; W Jack Rejeski; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Kathleen M Hayden; Christina E Hugenschmidt; June Pierce; Michael E Miller; Jaime L Speiser; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Denise K Houston; Robert L Newton; Stephen R Rapp; Dalane W Kitzman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 6.591
Authors: Humberto Parada; Gail A Laughlin; Mingan Yang; Frances R Nedjat-Haiem; Linda K McEvoy Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Erin L Richard; Gail A Laughlin; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Emilie T Reas; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Linda K McEvoy Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-08-14 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Patricio Solis-Urra; Julio Plaza-Diaz; Ana Isabel Álvarez-Mercado; Fernando Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Carlos Cristi-Montero; Juan Pablo Zavala-Crichton; Jorge Olivares-Arancibia; Javier Sanchez-Martinez; Francisco Abadía-Molina Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-11 Impact factor: 3.390