Literature DB >> 28433436

Subharmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation for Monitoring Interstitial Fluid Pressure in Tumors: Calibration and Treatment with Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer Xenografts.

Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir1, Jaydev K Dave2, Andrew Marshall1, Anya I Forsberg3, Traci B Fox4, John R Eisenbrey2, Priscilla Machado2, Ji-Bin Liu2, Daniel A Merton2, Flemming Forsberg5.   

Abstract

Interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) in rats with breast cancer xenografts was non-invasively estimated using subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) versus an invasive pressure monitor. Moreover, monitoring of IFP changes after chemotherapy was assessed. Eighty-nine rats (calibration n = 25, treatment n = 64) were injected with 5 × 106 breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231). Radiofrequency signals were acquired (39 rats successfully imaged) with a Sonix RP scanner (BK Ultrasound, Richmond, BC, Canada) using a linear array (L9-4, transmit/receive: 8/4 MHz) after administration of Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging, North Billerica, MA, USA; 180 μL/kg) and compared with readings from an invasive pressure monitor (Stryker, Berkshire, UK). An inverse linear relationship was established between tumor IFP and SHAPE (y = -1.06x + 28.27, r = -0.69, p = 0.01) in the calibration group. Use of this relationship in the treatment group resulted in r = 0.74 (p < 0.05) between measured (pressure monitor) and SHAPE-estimated IFP (average error: 6.24 mmHg). No significant before/after differences were observed with respect to paclitaxel treatment (5 mg/kg, Mayne Pharma, Paramus, NJ, USA) with either method (p ≥ 0.15).
Copyright © 2017 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer xenografts; Contrast agents; Interstitial fluid pressure; Microbubbles; Subharmonic-aided pressure estimation; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28433436      PMCID: PMC6082419          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  32 in total

1.  Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  W T Shi; F Forsberg; J S Raichlen; L Needleman; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Nicholas Pavlidis; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  In vivo perfusion estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Ji-Bin Liu; William T Shi; Raymond Ro; Kathryn J Lipcan; Xuedong Deng; Anne L Hall
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  In vivo pressure estimation using subharmonic contrast microbubble signals: proof of concept.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Ji-Bin Liu; William T Shi; Junji Furuse; Masafumi Shimizu; Barry B Goldberg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Subharmonic aided pressure estimation for monitoring interstitial fluid pressure in tumours--in vitro and in vivo proof of concept.

Authors:  V G Halldorsdottir; J K Dave; J R Eisenbrey; P Machado; H Zhao; J B Liu; D A Merton; F Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  Paclitaxel decreases the interstitial fluid pressure and improves oxygenation in breast cancers in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical implications.

Authors:  Alphonse G Taghian; Rita Abi-Raad; Sherif I Assaad; Adrian Casty; Marek Ancukiewicz; Eren Yeh; Peryhan Molokhia; Khaled Attia; Timothy Sullivan; Irene Kuter; Yves Boucher; Simon N Powell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Interstitial fluid pressure predicts survival in patients with cervix cancer independent of clinical prognostic factors and tumor oxygen measurements.

Authors:  M Milosevic; A Fyles; D Hedley; M Pintilie; W Levin; L Manchul; R Hill
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Subharmonic contrast microbubble signals for noninvasive pressure estimation under static and dynamic flow conditions.

Authors:  Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; Jaydev K Dave; Lauren M Leodore; John R Eisenbrey; Suhyun Park; Anne L Hall; Kai Thomenius; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 9.  High interstitial fluid pressure - an obstacle in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Carl-Henrik Heldin; Kristofer Rubin; Kristian Pietras; Arne Ostman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Interstitial hypertension in human breast and colorectal tumors.

Authors:  J R Less; M C Posner; Y Boucher; D Borochovitz; N Wolmark; R K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of hydrostatic pressure on phase-change contrast agent activation by pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  Saurabh Raut; Mawia Khairalseed; Arvin Honari; Shashank R Sirsi; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Ultrasound Pressure Estimation for Diagnosing Portal Hypertension in Patients Undergoing Dialysis for Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Priscilla Machado; Ipshita Gupta; Jonathan M Fenkel; Sriharsha Gummadi; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Colette M Shaw; Susan Schultz; Michael C Soulen; Kirk Wallace; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  Developing an Interface and Investigating Optimal Parameters for Real-Time Intracardiac Subharmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation.

Authors:  Cara Esposito; Kris Dickie; Flemming Forsberg; Jaydev K Dave
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Hepatic Vein Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Subharmonic Imaging Signal as a Screening Test for Portal Hypertension.

Authors:  Priscilla Machado; Ipshita Gupta; Sriharsha Gummadi; Maria Stanczak; Corinne E Wessner; Jonathan M Fenkel; Colette M Shaw; Susan Shamini-Noori; Susan Schultz; Michael C Soulen; Chandra M Sehgal; Kirk Wallace; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.487

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.