Literature DB >> 28432780

Single-subject independent component analysis-based intensity normalization in non-quantitative multi-modal structural MRI.

Sebastian Papazoglou1, Jens Würfel2, Friedemann Paul1,3,4, Alexander U Brandt1, Michael Scheel1.   

Abstract

Non-quantitative MRI is prone to intersubject intensity variation rendering signal intensity level based analyses limited. Here, we propose a method that fuses non-quantitative routine T1-weighted (T1w), T2w, and T2w fluid-saturated inversion recovery sequences using independent component analysis and validate it on age and sex matched healthy controls. The proposed method leads to consistent and independent components with a significantly reduced coefficient-of-variation across subjects, suggesting potential to serve as automatic intensity normalization and thus to enhance the power of intensity based statistical analyses. To exemplify this, we show that voxelwise statistical testing on single-subject independent components reveals in particular a widespread sex difference in white matter, which was previously shown using, for example, diffusion tensor imaging but unobservable in the native MRI contrasts. In conclusion, our study shows that single-subject independent component analysis can be applied to routine sequences, thereby enhancing comparability in-between subjects. Unlike quantitative MRI, which requires specific sequences during acquisition, our method is applicable to existing MRI data. Hum Brain Mapp 38:3615-3622, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  independent component analysis; intensity normalization; multi-modal MRI; sexual dimorphism; structural MRI

Year:  2017        PMID: 28432780      PMCID: PMC6866790          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  24 in total

1.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications.

Authors:  A Hyvärinen; E Oja
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2000 May-Jun

2.  Quantitative analysis in clinical applications of brain MRI using independent component analysis coupled with support vector machine.

Authors:  Jyh-Wen Chai; Clayton Chi-Chang Chen; Chih-Ming Chiang; Yung-Jen Ho; Hsian-Min Chen; Yen-Chieh Ouyang; Ching-Wen Yang; San-Kan Lee; Chein-I Chang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic.

Authors:  Daphna Joel; Zohar Berman; Ido Tavor; Nadav Wexler; Olga Gaber; Yaniv Stein; Nisan Shefi; Jared Pool; Sebastian Urchs; Daniel S Margulies; Franziskus Liem; Jürgen Hänggi; Lutz Jäncke; Yaniv Assaf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Testing the ICA mixing matrix based on inter-subject or inter-session consistency.

Authors:  Aapo Hyvärinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Normalization of white matter intensity on T1-weighted images of patients with acquired central nervous system demyelination.

Authors:  Rezwan Ghassemi; Robert Brown; Sridar Narayanan; Brenda Banwell; Kunio Nakamura; Douglas L Arnold
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  Could Sex Differences in White Matter be Explained by g ratio?

Authors:  Tomás Paus; Roberto Toro
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.856

7.  Cortical atrophy patterns in multiple sclerosis are non-random and clinically relevant.

Authors:  Martijn D Steenwijk; Jeroen J G Geurts; Marita Daams; Betty M Tijms; Alle Meije Wink; Lisanne J Balk; Prejaas K Tewarie; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Frederik Barkhof; Hugo Vrenken; Petra J W Pouwels
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Source-based morphometry: the use of independent component analysis to identify gray matter differences with application to schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lai Xu; Karyn M Groth; Godfrey Pearlson; David J Schretlen; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Gender differences in white matter microstructure.

Authors:  Richard A Kanaan; Matthew Allin; Marco Picchioni; Gareth J Barker; Eileen Daly; Sukhwinder S Shergill; James Woolley; Philip K McGuire
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Joint source based morphometry identifies linked gray and white matter group differences.

Authors:  Lai Xu; Godfrey Pearlson; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.