Literature DB >> 21704714

Testing the ICA mixing matrix based on inter-subject or inter-session consistency.

Aapo Hyvärinen1.   

Abstract

Independent component analysis (ICA) is increasingly used for analyzing brain imaging data. ICA typically gives a large number of components, many of which may be just random, due to insufficient sample size, violations of the model, or algorithmic problems. Few methods are available for computing the statistical significance (reliability) of the components. We propose to approach this problem by performing ICA separately on a number of subjects, and finding components which are sufficiently consistent (similar) over subjects. Similarity is defined here as the similarity of the mixing coefficients, which usually correspond to spatial patterns in EEG and MEG. The threshold of what is "sufficient" is rigorously defined by a null hypothesis under which the independent components are random orthogonal components in the whitened space. Components which are consistent in different subjects are found by clustering under the constraint that a cluster can only contain one source from each subject, and by constraining the number of the false positives based on the null hypothesis. Instead of different subjects, the method can also be applied on different recording sessions from a single subject. The testing method is particularly applicable to EEG and MEG analysis.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21704714     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  11 in total

1.  Single-subject independent component analysis-based intensity normalization in non-quantitative multi-modal structural MRI.

Authors:  Sebastian Papazoglou; Jens Würfel; Friedemann Paul; Alexander U Brandt; Michael Scheel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Functional connectivity-based identification of subdivisions of the basal ganglia and thalamus using multilevel independent component analysis of resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Dae-Jin Kim; Bumhee Park; Hae-Jeong Park
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Diego Vidaurre; Christian F Beckmann; Matthew F Glasser; Mark Jenkinson; Karla L Miller; Thomas E Nichols; Emma C Robinson; Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi; Mark W Woolrich; Deanna M Barch; Kamil Uğurbil; David C Van Essen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Measure projection analysis: a probabilistic approach to EEG source comparison and multi-subject inference.

Authors:  Nima Bigdely-Shamlo; Tim Mullen; Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Independent component analysis: recent advances.

Authors:  Aapo Hyvärinen
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Validation of Shared and Specific Independent Component Analysis (SSICA) for Between-Group Comparisons in fMRI.

Authors:  Mona Maneshi; Shahabeddin Vahdat; Jean Gotman; Christophe Grova
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Mapping thalamocortical functional connectivity with large-scale brain networks in patients with first-episode psychosis.

Authors:  Yoo Bin Kwak; Kang Ik Kevin Cho; Wu Jeong Hwang; Ahra Kim; Minji Ha; Hyungyou Park; Junhee Lee; Tae Yong Lee; Minah Kim; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Testing independent component patterns by inter-subject or inter-session consistency.

Authors:  Aapo Hyvärinen; Pavan Ramkumar
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Population level inference for multivariate MEG analysis.

Authors:  Anna Jafarpour; Gareth Barnes; Lluis Fuentemilla; Emrah Duzel; Will D Penny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparing the Performance of Popular MEG/EEG Artifact Correction Methods in an Evoked-Response Study.

Authors:  Niels Trusbak Haumann; Lauri Parkkonen; Marina Kliuchko; Peter Vuust; Elvira Brattico
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.