Osamah M Abdulaal1, Louise Rainford2, Peter MacMahon3,4, Eoin Kavanagh3,4, Marie Galligan2, James Cashman5,4, Allison McGee2. 1. Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. osamah.abdulaal@ucdconnect.ie. 2. Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. 3. Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. 4. School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 5. Department of Orthopaedics, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate optimised isotropic 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) and gradient echo (GRE)-based pulse sequences for visualisation of articular cartilage lesions within the knee joint. METHODS: Optimisation of experimental imaging sequences was completed using healthy volunteers (n=16) with a 3-Tesla (3T) MRI scanner. Imaging of patients with knee cartilage abnormalities (n=57) was then performed. Acquired sequences included 3D proton density-weighted (PDW) TSE (SPACE) with and without fat-suppression (FS), and T2*W GRE (TrueFISP) sequences, with acquisition times of 6:51, 6:32 and 5:35 min, respectively. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one confirmed cartilage lesions were detected and categorised (Grade II n=90, Grade III n=71). The highest sensitivity and specificity for detecting cartilage lesions were obtained with TrueFISP with values of 84.7% and 92%, respectively. Cartilage SNR mean for PDW SPACE-FS was the highest at 72.2. TrueFISP attained the highest CNR means for joint fluid/cartilage (101.5) and joint fluid/ligament (156.5), and the lowest CNR for cartilage/meniscus (48.5). Significant differences were identified across the three sequences for all anatomical structures with respect to SNR and CNR findings (p-value <0.05). CONCLUSION: Isotropic TrueFISP at 3T, optimised for acquisition time, accurately detects cartilage defects, although it demonstrated the lowest contrast between cartilage and meniscus. KEY POINTS: • Cartilage is better visualised with 3D TrueFISP than 3D SPACE sequences. • 3D TrueFISP is a reliable sequence for detecting low- and high-grade cartilage defects. • 3D TrueFISP at 3T provides excellent contrast between cartilage and joint fluid.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate optimised isotropic 3D turbo spin echo (TSE) and gradient echo (GRE)-based pulse sequences for visualisation of articular cartilage lesions within the knee joint. METHODS: Optimisation of experimental imaging sequences was completed using healthy volunteers (n=16) with a 3-Tesla (3T) MRI scanner. Imaging of patients with knee cartilage abnormalities (n=57) was then performed. Acquired sequences included 3D proton density-weighted (PDW) TSE (SPACE) with and without fat-suppression (FS), and T2*W GRE (TrueFISP) sequences, with acquisition times of 6:51, 6:32 and 5:35 min, respectively. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one confirmed cartilage lesions were detected and categorised (Grade II n=90, Grade III n=71). The highest sensitivity and specificity for detecting cartilage lesions were obtained with TrueFISP with values of 84.7% and 92%, respectively. Cartilage SNR mean for PDW SPACE-FS was the highest at 72.2. TrueFISP attained the highest CNR means for joint fluid/cartilage (101.5) and joint fluid/ligament (156.5), and the lowest CNR for cartilage/meniscus (48.5). Significant differences were identified across the three sequences for all anatomical structures with respect to SNR and CNR findings (p-value <0.05). CONCLUSION: Isotropic TrueFISP at 3T, optimised for acquisition time, accurately detects cartilage defects, although it demonstrated the lowest contrast between cartilage and meniscus. KEY POINTS: • Cartilage is better visualised with 3D TrueFISP than 3D SPACE sequences. • 3D TrueFISP is a reliable sequence for detecting low- and high-grade cartilage defects. • 3D TrueFISP at 3T provides excellent contrast between cartilage and joint fluid.
Entities:
Keywords:
Articular; Cartilage; Evidence-based practice; Knee joint; Magnetic resonance imaging
Authors: Oliver Ristow; Lynne Steinbach; Gregory Sabo; Roland Krug; Markus Huber; Isabel Rauscher; Ben Ma; Thomas M Link Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-01-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M D Crema; M H Nogueira-Barbosa; F W Roemer; M D Marra; J Niu; F A Chagas-Neto; E Gregio-Junior; A Guermazi Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2012-12-26 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: C Rehnitz; J Kupfer; N A Streich; I Burkholder; B Schmitt; L Lauer; H-U Kauczor; M-A Weber Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Michel D Crema; Frank W Roemer; Monica D Marra; Deborah Burstein; Garry E Gold; Felix Eckstein; Thomas Baum; Timothy J Mosher; John A Carrino; Ali Guermazi Journal: Radiographics Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Richard Kijowski; Kirkland W Davis; Donna G Blankenbaker; Michael A Woods; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Arthur A De Smet Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2011-03-12 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Sylvain R Duc; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Marius R Schmid; Marco Zanetti; Peter P Koch; Fabian Kalberer; Juerg Hodler Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-08-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jin Young Jung; Young Cheol Yoon; Hye Rin Kim; Bong-Keun Choe; Joon Ho Wang; Jee Young Jung Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 11.105