Literature DB >> 28431153

Trends in Absolute and Relative Educational Inequalities in Adult Smoking Since the Early 2000s: The Case of Germany.

Jens Hoebel1, Benjamin Kuntz1, Lars E Kroll1, Jonas D Finger2, Johannes Zeiher2, Cornelia Lange2, Thomas Lampert1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Since the early 2000s, several tobacco control policies have been implemented in Germany. Current research is inconsistent about how strengthening tobacco control can affect social inequalities in smoking. This study examines whether educational inequalities in adult smoking have widened in Germany since 2003.
Methods: Data were used from four cross-sectional national health surveys conducted between 2003 and 2012 (n = 54,197; age = 25-69 years). Participants who smoked daily or occasionally were classified as smokers. The regression-based Slope Index of Inequality and Relative Index of Inequality (RII) were calculated to estimate the extent of absolute and relative educational inequalities in smoking, respectively.
Results: In each survey year, smoking was associated with lower education. Overall, crude and age-standardized smoking rates declined over time. Stratified by education, trends of declining smoking rates were observed only in the high and medium education groups, whereas no statistically significant trend was found in the low education group. Relative educational inequalities in smoking increased significantly in men (2003: RII=1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.46 to 2.07; 2012: RII = 2.25, 95% confidence interval 1.90 to 2.67; p-trend = .019). Absolute educational inequalities in smoking were not found to have changed significantly during the study period. Conclusions: In the course of declining smoking rates, educational inequalities in smoking persisted in both absolute and relative terms. In men, relative inequalities in smoking may even have widened within only 9 years. Tobacco control policies should not only be targeted at the entire population but also attempt to reduce social inequalities in smoking by focusing more on socially disadvantaged groups. Implications: Smoking is associated with lower education in most European countries and contributes to social inequalities in health. Since the beginning of the 2000s, Germany has implemented a variety of tobacco control policies to reduce smoking in the population. This study reveals that despite a general decline in adult smoking, educational inequalities in smoking have persisted and even widened in Germany since 2003. The findings emphasize that more targeted efforts are needed to tackle smoking-induced inequalities in health.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28431153     DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  21 in total

1.  Future smoking prevalence by socioeconomic status in England: a computational modelling study.

Authors:  Fujian Song; Tim Elwell-Sutton; Felix Naughton; Sarah Gentry
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  A Dermatologist's Ammunition in the War Against Smoking: A Photoaging App.

Authors:  Titus Josef Brinker; Alexander Enk; Martina Gatzka; Yasuhiro Nakamura; Wiebke Sondermann; Albert Joachim Omlor; Maximilian Philip Petri; Ante Karoglan; Werner Seeger; Joachim Klode; Christof von Kalle; Dirk Schadendorf
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 3.  Socioeconomic Correlates and Determinants of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the General Adult Population: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine J Ombrellaro; Nita Perumal; Johannes Zeiher; Jens Hoebel; Till Ittermann; Ralf Ewert; Marcus Dörr; Thomas Keil; Gert B M Mensink; Jonas D Finger
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2018-06-07

4.  Educational inequalities in subjective health in Germany from 1994 to 2014: a trend analysis using the German Socio-Economic Panel study (GSOEP).

Authors:  Irene Moor; Sebastian Günther; Anja Knöchelmann; Jens Hoebel; Timo-Kolja Pförtner; Thomas Lampert; Matthias Richter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Socioeconomic Inequalities in Total and Site-Specific Cancer Incidence in Germany: A Population-Based Registry Study.

Authors:  Jens Hoebel; Lars E Kroll; Julia Fiebig; Thomas Lampert; Alexander Katalinic; Benjamin Barnes; Klaus Kraywinkel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  A Smoking Prevention Program Delivered by Medical Students to Secondary Schools in Brazil Called "Education Against Tobacco": Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Oscar Campos Lisboa; Breno Bernardes-Souza; Luiz Eduardo De Freitas Xavier; Matheus Rocha Almeida; Paulo César Rodrigues Pinto Corrêa; Titus Josef Brinker
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Public attitudes towards healthcare policies promoting tobacco cessation in Germany: results from the representative German study on tobacco use (DEBRA study).

Authors:  Sabrina Kastaun; Daniel Kotz; Jamie Brown; Lion Shahab; Melanie Boeckmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health in Germany: a time-trend analysis of repeated cross-sectional health surveys between 2003 and 2012.

Authors:  Benjamin Wachtler; Jens Hoebel; Thomas Lampert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Post-millennial trends of socioeconomic inequalities in chronic illness among adults in Germany.

Authors:  Jens Hoebel; Benjamin Kuntz; Irene Moor; Lars Eric Kroll; Thomas Lampert
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-03-27

10.  A Face-Aging Smoking Prevention/Cessation Intervention for Nursery School Students in Germany: An Appearance-Focused Interventional Study.

Authors:  Titus J Brinker; Jonas Alfitian; Werner Seeger; David A Groneberg; Christof von Kalle; Alexander H Enk; Felix J F Herth; Michael Kreuter; Claudia M Bauer; Martina Gatzka; Janina L Suhre
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.