Literature DB >> 28431106

Ultrasound cut-off values for intima-media thickness of temporal, facial and axillary arteries in giant cell arteritis.

Valentin S Schäfer1, Aaron Juche1, Sofia Ramiro2, Andreas Krause1, Wolfgang A Schmidt1.   

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the intima-media thickness (IMT) of arteries involved in GCA for determining cut-off values.
Methods: Forty newly diagnosed GCA patients in a fast-track GCA clinic and 40 age- and sex-matched controls were included. IMT measurement was performed at or within 24 h after diagnosis. The common superficial temporal arteries with their frontal and parietal branches and the facial arteries were bilaterally examined with a 10-22 MHz probe and the axillary artery with a 6-18 MHz probe. Receiver operating characteristics analysis was performed for estimating cut-off values.
Results: The mean age was 72 years (s.d. 9) and 68% were females. In the control group, IMT was 0.23 mm (s.d. 0.04), 0.19 mm (s.d. 0.03), 0.20 mm (s.d. 0.03), 0.24 mm (s.d. 0.05) and 0.59 mm (s.d. 0.10) for the common superficial temporal arteries, the frontal and parietal branches, the facial arteries and the axillary arteries, respectively. In vasculitic segments of GCA patients, IMT was 0.65 mm (s.d. 0.18), 0.54 mm (s.d. 0.18), 0.50 mm (s.d. 0.17), 0.53 mm (s.d. 0.16) and 1.7 mm (s.d. 0.41), respectively. Cut-off values are 0.42, 0.34, 0.29, 0.37 and 1.0 mm, respectively, with 100% sensitivities and specificities for common superficial temporal arteries, for frontal branches and for axillary arteries and sensitivities of 97.2 and 87.5% and specificities of 98.7 and 98.8% for parietal branches and facial arteries, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient was between 0.87 and 0.98.
Conclusion: IMT measurement can correctly distinguish vasculitic from normal arteries in suspected GCA.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  cut-off values; giant cell arteritis; intima-media thickness; temporal arteritis; ultrasound; vasculitis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28431106     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  22 in total

Review 1.  The use of ultrasound to assess giant cell arteritis: review of the current evidence and practical guide for the rheumatologist.

Authors:  Sara Monti; Alberto Floris; Cristina Ponte; Wolfgang A Schmidt; Andreas P Diamantopoulos; Claudio Pereira; Jennifer Piper; Raashid Luqmani
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  [73/f-Pronounced fatigue, myalgia of the shoulder joints and pelvic girdle as well as recently occurring headaches : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 62].

Authors:  V S Schäfer; N Weber
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  A Tale of Diagnostic Delay with Detrimental Consequences: Illustrating the Challenging Nature of Diagnosing Giant Cell Arteritis.

Authors:  Marieke van Nieuwland; Dennis Boumans; Gerben Jan Jacob Plas; Onno Dirk Vijlbrief; Celina Alves
Journal:  Eur J Case Rep Intern Med       Date:  2021-07-27

4.  [Imaging diagnostics in large vessel vasculitis].

Authors:  W A Schmidt; W Hartung
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 5.  Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of large-vessel vasculitides.

Authors:  Gokhan Keser; Kenan Aksu
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Associations among temporal and large artery abnormalities on vascular ultrasound in giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  M A DiIorio; P S Sobiesczcyk; C Xu; W Huang; J A Ford; S S Zhao; D H Solomon; W P Docken; S K Tedeschi
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.057

Review 7.  Advantages in diagnosis of giant cell arteritis by ultrasound.

Authors:  Joanna Wojczal; Grzegorz Kozera; Piotr Luchowski; Jolanta Neubauer-Geryk
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging compared to ultrasonography in giant cell arteritis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ashley Yip; Elizabeth Torrey Jernberg; Mohammad Bardi; Julia Geiger; Frode Lohne; Wolfgang Andreas Schmidt; Geirmund Myklebust; Andreas P Diamantopoulos
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 5.156

9.  Definitions and reliability assessment of elementary ultrasound lesions in giant cell arteritis: a study from the OMERACT Large Vessel Vasculitis Ultrasound Working Group.

Authors:  Stavros Chrysidis; Christina Duftner; Christian Dejaco; Valentin S Schäfer; Sofia Ramiro; Greta Carrara; Carlo Alberto Scirè; Alojzija Hocevar; Andreas P Diamantopoulos; Annamaria Iagnocco; Chetan Mukhtyar; Cristina Ponte; Esperanza Naredo; Eugenio De Miguel; George A Bruyn; Kenneth J Warrington; Lene Terslev; Marcin Milchert; Maria Antonietta D'Agostino; Mattew J Koster; Naina Rastalsky; Petra Hanova; Pierluigi Macchioni; Tanaz A Kermani; Tove Lorenzen; Uffe Møller Døhn; Ulrich Fredberg; Wolfgang Hartung; Bhaskar Dasgupta; Wolfgang A Schmidt
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2018-05-17

10.  Diagnostic performance and utility of very high-resolution ultrasonography in diagnosing giant cell arteritis of the temporal artery.

Authors:  Johnny K M Sundholm; Tom Pettersson; Anders Paetau; Anders Albäck; Taisto Sarkola
Journal:  Rheumatol Adv Pract       Date:  2019-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.