Literature DB >> 28431026

Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series.

Vicente Vanaclocha1, Juan Manuel Herrera1, Nieves Sáiz-Sapena2, Marlon Rivera-Paz1, Francisco Verdú-López1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is an under-recognized condition. Substantial information supports the safety and effectiveness of SIJ fusion (SIJF). Long-term follow-up after SIJF has not been reported.
OBJECTIVE: To determine responses to conservative management (CM), SIJ denervation, and SIJF in patients with SIJ pain unresponsive to CM.
METHODS: Retrospective study with long-term (up to 6 yr) follow-up of 137 patients with SIJ pain seen in an outpatient neurosurgery clinic who received either CM (n = 63), sacroiliac denervation (n = 47), or minimally invasive SIJF (n = 27). At each routine clinic visit, patients completed pain scores and Oswestry Disability Index. Additional data were extracted from medical charts.
RESULTS: Patients treated with continued CM had no long-term improvement in pain (mean worsening of 1 point) or disability (mean Oswestry Disability Index worsened by 4-6 points), increased their use of opioids, and had poor long-term work status. SIJF patients had large improvements in SIJ pain (mean 6 points), large improvements in disability (mean 25 points), a decrease in opioid use, and good final work status. Sacroiliac denervation patients had intermediate responses (0-1 and 1-2 points, respectively).
CONCLUSION: In patients with SIJ pain unresponsive to CM, SIJF resulted in excellent long-term clinical responses, with low opioid use and better work status compared to other treatments.
Copyright © 2017 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; Sacroiliac joint denervation; Sacroiliac joint fusion; Sacroiliac joint pain

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28431026     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  18 in total

1.  Triangular titanium implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.

Authors:  Nikolai G Rainov; Reinhard Schneiderhan; Volkmar Heidecke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Editor's Introduction: Update on Current Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures: Implications for Appropriate Current Procedural Terminology Medical Coding.

Authors:  Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

3.  International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Policy 2020 Update-Minimally Invasive Surgical Sacroiliac Joint Fusion (for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain): Coverage Indications, Limitations, and Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Morgan Lorio; Richard Kube; Ali Araghi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

4.  Sacroiliac joint pain: is the medical world aware enough of its existence? Why not considering sacroiliac joint fusion in the recalcitrant cases?

Authors:  Vicente Vanaclocha-Vanaclocha; Nieves Sáiz-Sapena; Leyre Vanaclocha
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

5.  Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion vs. conservative management for chronic sacroiliac joint pain.

Authors:  David W Polly
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 6.  Minimally Invasive and Conservative Interventions for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Review of Recent Literature.

Authors:  Mayank Aranke; Grace McCrudy; Kelsey Rooney; Kunaal Patel; Christopher A Lee; Jamal Hasoon; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-05-31

7.  Long-term prospective outcomes after minimally invasive trans-iliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants.

Authors:  Emily Darr; S Craig Meyer; Peter G Whang; Don Kovalsky; Clay Frank; Harry Lockstadt; Robert Limoni; Andy Redmond; Philip Ploska; Michael Y Oh; Daniel Cher; Abhineet Chowdhary
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-04-09

8.  Postmarket surveillance of 3D-printed implants for sacroiliac joint fusion.

Authors:  Daniel Cher; Kendrick Wroe; W Carlton Reckling; Scott Yerby
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-09-28

9.  Pelvic orthosis effects on posterior pelvis kinematics An in-vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  Stefan Klima; Ronny Grunert; Benjamin Ondruschka; Mario Scholze; Thomas Seidel; Michael Werner; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Prospective Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using 3D-Printed Triangular Titanium Implants: 24-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Vikas Patel; Don Kovalsky; S Craig Meyer; Abhineet Chowdhary; Julie LaCombe; Harry Lockstadt; Fernando Techy; Casey Langel; Robert Limoni; Philip Yuan; Andy Kranenburg; Daniel Cher; Gabriel Tender
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2021-06-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.